Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest jimmyd17

93 camry??? are u ppl insane? they have to be the ugliest piece of crap on the roads.. they look like an over-inflated marshmellow, they are a horrible car to drive with unresponsive steering, not to mention how completely gutless they are... even the V6's are cops. any of the other cars seem fine though. i'd go a N14 pulsar for 6K

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nissan Bluebird. theyre around $6000 - $11000

the SSS 4WD Attesa sr20det are around 11k and up i think

found a 1994 NISSAN BLUEBIRD TI

$4,990

Manual

Sedan

Km: 233,518

Colour: Burgundy

10/1994. 2.4 litre. With air conditioning, power steering, electric mirrors/windows, cruise control, factory alloys. Drives excellent.

carsales - bluebird

the rego was coming up and the tyres need changing etc and i need to come with 3000 dollars and need to sell but once i get my finaice stable i will buy another one now i just need a car that can drive and damn reliable as i dont want to spend anything on this car

i have found daihatsu terios that look like a fun car to drive and a suzuki vitara maybe anyone know about those cars which one is faster

93 camry??? are u ppl insane? they have to be the ugliest piece of crap on the roads.. they look like an over-inflated marshmellow, they are a horrible car to drive with unresponsive steering, not to mention how completely gutless they are... even the V6's are cops. any of the other cars seem fine though. i'd go a N14 pulsar for 6K

agreed, except get a U12 trx instead of an n14 :(

Dude, stay away from anything that is performance orineted - it woudl have been thrashed and in need of dollars spending. I like your idea on the camery or magna, but they are just so dull... I would go a Mazda 626, or the telstar cousin - but get a manual (better on fuel).

Anything that is too small will be a bitch to live with.

http://forums.fastfours.com.au/viewtopic.php?t=78122

1987 ae82 twin cam seca

resprayed toyota factory red ( 12 months old )

185,000kms

exhaust

lowered

updated ae92 interior

standard alloys

4 wheel disc

Mar 23 2005 rego

jvc cd player

kenwood front 4 inch speakers

jbl rear 5x7s

mechanically sound

rebuilt rear calipers, handbrake, new rack ends, dizzy

have receipts for $2000

$3500 ONO

sydney

www.cottee.net/gallery1.html

Car is in good condition. Reason for sale - Loss of license; no P plates + using handheld mobile

The R31. Fuel economy is OK. between 8 and 12l per 100/km on average stop start driving.

The RB30E engine is tough as nails. Plenty have hit 300,000ks and still going strong. Many have also strapped turbos to the n/a motor with over 200,000ks and they still survive.

The downside is they are a dated design if you wanted a more modern look.

The words "RX7" & "Reliable" in the same sentence

:(:D:rant:

They are actually reliable despite what people think, like every other car if maintaned properly and not heavily modified they are a good thing. And the little 12A's in the S1,2,3s are good for 200-250,000kms. But if the maintenance wasn't up to scratch look out...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...