Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you rotate the stand 90 degrees it shouldn't dent the rails as the force is closer to the corners, but like 'GoHard' said put it under a xmember if possible. I'm not a fan of that style of stand, have heard some stories about them

I use a sawn-off and a black ski mask....oh wait....wrong sort of car jacking. Most misleading thread title ever...

but while I'm here, I use that spot but with something in between to spread the load out a bit.

I use a sawn-off and a black ski mask....oh wait....wrong sort of car jacking. Most misleading thread title ever...

but while I'm here, I use that spot but with something in between to spread the load out a bit.

Cheers for the input Andy, also I'm sorry i misled you, must have taken so much effort to click through and look at a couple pictures.

I was thinking to put something in between too, next time i JACK it up.

GoHard: Isn't the crossmember where i am jacking the car from? That flat metal piece under the engine, that's where i put the wood and jacked the car from. It's a little hard to come from the front of the car as my plastic under tray doesn't give enough clearance, thus i went in from the side (might be able to go from the front once i get a thicker piece of wood to drive the car onto).

So i should place the stands where i placed the hydraulic jack, with some wood to help spread the weight?

Yeah some of those stands I've used and seen have started to give way. Especially the stands that are aged and have rust on the welded joints, BIG saftey risk there. I would prefer to use triangular stands as the pressure is evenly distributed across a wider base.

The stands you are using are fine, yes you can buy better ones. But jacking the car up straight and having the car on a level surface as well as where you put the stands is more important. If there is not sideways pressure on the car I really cannot see it going anywhere. BUT if you don't like them or think they are unsafe, spend the proper. $$ for a better design. Your the one who has to crawl under there.

A good spot I have always used to put jack stands is on the pivot point of the caster arms. They have a large round end that the stands sit onto nicely. They are also quite far out giving good stability.

If your cheap and don't want to buy new stands, you could use some angle and weld it to the base at the corners and the upright on each side. Kinda dodgy but I've seen it done on more than one occasion.

I have a dodgy paint picture of how to do it, but don't know how to upload it

Thanks everyone for your feedback.

I don't mind buying another set if i have to, i was planning on getting a new pair but i guess i have been lazy, i really wanted to change and flush my oil that day so i used what i had. I read their load specs before i used them, can't remember them right now, but it was enough to convince me it was safe, especially with 2 of them and a jack there too.

Blue_vl_t : That was what i was thinking, surface was flat and the force seemed to only go staight down to the base. I was more worried about that metal pin that holds the level, thought it was going to snap! But it held very well (obviously).

New stand are on the shopping list, but i was more concerned about the placement of them so that i would not harm my car in any way.

Thanks again all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...