Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello

so it is generally agreed on this forum that the power limit for a stock bottom end rb26 on 98 is around 350kw...

now I know it all comes down to how its treated and tuned etc, but do we have any indication of the upper power limit of a stock bottom end rb26 on e85?

mine seems to be making healthy power and is going strong

my brother's is making 440kw on a stock motor and has been going strong for months

know of a few other stock bottom end GTRs making the low 400kws mark on e85

The Mercury Motorsport GTR is making a whopping 600kw on a stock N1 block with this fuel

so I ask you, what do we think the limit is....

this is more of a discussion rather than trying to figure out the exact number because it does heavily depend on treatment, tune, motor condition etc etc

What do you think? Do you know of any other stock bottom rb monsters? or have you seen high power stock bottom ends rb26s with e85 fail at a certain power level??

Discuss :)

Edited by usmair
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/413047-stock-rb26-power-limit-on-e85/
Share on other sites

depends on what its used for and the boost level, its common to make big power but i would guarantee unless its drag (full load for 9-12 secs at a time) etc a 500-600awkw gtr is not going to last many laps (1/2 hour at a time) in a circuit type situation...

The way its driven is the most crucial part. Thrash it and it wont last.

Squirts here and there should last.

Circuit probably wont last.

My own GTR is 402kw 22psi E72

Has only had dyno and drag time, 2 street cruises

Just have to be prepared if u want to push limits and it does let go u have to accept the fact.

Ur on 370kw now right?

Did u sort out the issue's u are having.

Yep agrees it depends on application and how it's treated.

I do have a 2.8L stroker fund put aside but would prefer not to utilise it if not necessary.

Mine is running well actually... Had a big cut in one if the piping.. Once that was replaced the boost and power was back to how it was before.

Still keen to chuck it on another dyno though... Anyone know of any awd dyno days coming up in Sydney??

Yep agrees it depends on application and how it's treated.

I do have a 2.8L stroker fund put aside but would prefer not to utilise it if not necessary.

Mine is running well actually... Had a big cut in one if the piping.. Once that was replaced the boost and power was back to how it was before.

Still keen to chuck it on another dyno though... Anyone know of any awd dyno days coming up in Sydney??

Stick it on Jez's 2WD.

Yep agrees it depends on application and how it's treated.

I do have a 2.8L stroker fund put aside but would prefer not to utilise it if not necessary.

Mine is running well actually... Had a big cut in one if the piping.. Once that was replaced the boost and power was back to how it was before.

Still keen to chuck it on another dyno though... Anyone know of any awd dyno days coming up in Sydney??

Unigroup is having one in December ive been told....would be good to see a few of the bigger HP cars around Sydney there on a level playing field

lets see if they make the power they all say they make

its a RWD dyno only but im sure we can get the front shaft taken out for such events

The Mercury Motorsport GTR is making a whopping 600kw on a stock N1 block with this fuel

800hp, or there about - but having they are building a 3.2ltr for "when" it dies.

I think no-one is under any illusion there what will happen eventually, least of all the owners of it.

Its the age old saying, if you cant afford the rebuild then dont chase the power. The fuel being used is irrelevant when its a 15yo motor.

i was impressed when i finally got my r33 GTR, and just stuck a GTX3582r with 6boost manifold twin scroll. power fc with two z32 afm 2 hks bov vent back in, and intank Tomia pump. at the same 1 bar and a good tune stock injector at close to 8000 rpm the check light would flash (injector max out)

124 mph in the quarter dont remember the ET.

but i will never buy another gtst. lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...