Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Hey guys another one to avoid. While this car is not advertised on the dealer's website, I can assure you it is currently for sale at Elite Motorsports/ Sports auto group, being advertised with 38 xxxKM. It is a 2002 BNR34 M Spec Nur in pearl white.

What is most unusual about this car is that the seats have been retrimmed ( strange for a 30 xxx km car) in black without the GTR logo on the headrest .

A car that looks identical was sold by FC autosource, here is the link:

http://www.fcautosource.com/ListingDetail.aspx?fcauto_id=19560

Here is a screen shot:

post-133648-0-83082500-1404988271_thumb.png

Here is a pic of the seats

post-133648-0-83804100-1404986149_thumb.png

Here is the vin number taken from the car at the dealership in Sydney:

BNR34- 404019

I have aquired the Japanese registration certificate for the corresponding car in Japanese and English:

BNR34-404019 (2).pdf

Please note:

- The Name of owner is listed as FC autosource

-The last two records of registration are only 9 days and nearly 3000KM apart. Seems strange?

-These recordings were 1) 30 900KM and 2) 33 700KM.

Yet another example of a clocked GTR. It would be interesting to know just what % of R34 GTR's in Oz have genuine km's with solid supporting documentation. I suspect well under 25%. I'm currently advertising my Nur, with fully documented km's, japanese and Aussie service records etc etc, yet it gets compared with cars like the above with lower km's showing on the speedo and dodgy docs. Crazy. The people I feel most sorry for are the guys that don't do all the research and end up buying a 150,000km car without knowing. And Fair Trading NSW don't want to know. Great...

Here is the vin number taken from the car at the dealership in Sydney:

BNR34- 404019

I have aquired the Japanese registration certificate for the corresponding car in Japanese and English:

attachicon.gifBNR34-404019 (2).pdf

Please note:

- The Name of owner is listed as FC autosource

-The last two records of registration are only 9 days and nearly 3000KM apart. Seems strange?

-These recordings were 1) 30 900KM and 2) 33 700KM.

Nice work Steve - what you've stumbled on is an advanced technique called a "refresh".

The services of certain mileage verification services in getting hold of de-registration certificates have caused significant issues for import dealerships. The dealer you mentioned in particular has been using this technique to hide it's tracks. Unfortunately many consumers don't understand how a de-registration certificate is supposed to work, and therefore miss the point you've illustrated in regard to the 9-day gap between registrations. They look at the last mileage recorded and figure all must be hunky-dory.

Here is the auction sheet for the car:

nFeYY2q.jpg

X33Kk4Xs.jpg VPuc8XOs.jpg ZAlWjE8s.jpg

So the complete timeline looks like this:

1) [27/2/2014] Car sells at USS Tokyo - 173,414km

--- rewind occurs ---

2) [31/3/2014] Car is re-registered with 30,900km

3) [08/4/2014] Car is re-registered with 33,700km

Since the department of transport in Japan only record the previous two mileage readings, this scrubs the true mileage from the system. Inside Japan this would be a risky exercise as for a short window of time there is conclusive proof that an illegal odometer rewind occured. Unfortunately the car leaves the country a matter of days later, so it's unlikely anyone notices or that anything can be done.

Edited by dodgyimports

Nice work Steve - what you've stumbled on is an advanced technique called a "refresh".

The services of certain mileage verification services in getting hold of de-registration certificates have caused significant issues for import dealerships. The dealer you mentioned in particular has been using this technique to hide it's tracks. Unfortunately many consumers don't understand how a de-registration certificate is supposed to work, and therefore miss the point you've illustrated in regard to the 9-day gap between registrations. They look at the last mileage recorded and figure all must be hunky-dory.

Here is the auction sheet for the car:

nFeYY2q.jpg

X33Kk4Xs.jpg VPuc8XOs.jpg ZAlWjE8s.jpg

So the complete timeline looks like this:

1) [27/2/2014] Car sells at USS Tokyo - 173,414km

--- rewind occurs ---

2) [31/3/2014] Car is re-registered with 30,900km

3) [08/4/2014] Car is re-registered with 33,700km

Since the department of transport in Japan only record the previous two mileage readings, this scrubs the true mileage from the system. Inside Japan this would be a risky exercise as for a short window of time there is conclusive proof that an illegal odometer rewind occured. Unfortunately the car leaves the country a matter of days later, so it's unlikely anyone notices or that anything can be done.

^^^ this has been going on for a while in Japan by the dodgy people who operate there in the export industry.

^^^ this has been going on for a while in Japan by the dodgy people who operate there in the export industry.

Certainly, the local dealerships would like you to believe that it's the "dodgy exporters" when they point the finger of blame.

Look again at the above example, it wasn't the exporter who has advertised the car in question with super-low mileage.

Nevermind the fact that at the time the dealers get the cars complied, these examples are almost always inside the 3-month window whereby almost anyone can look up the auction records. As if the dealership, having operated in the industry for years wouldn't know where to look.

How likely is it as well for the dealer themselves to have facilitated the purchase at auction and then slipped their exporter some extra cash to make it happen?

If this was happening, they didn't know then were enlightened of the fact you'd think they would switch to a different exporter with a good reputation and it wouldn't happen anymore. Instead the same stuff has been going on for years and years with some of these mobs.

  • 8 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...