Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have just bought another R33 that has port work and " bigger " cams..lol I have no idea what size they are.. but has SARD fuel rail and sard injectors don't know size... Molly fuel reg bosh 044 pump alot bigger garret turbo tail gate and 3" exhaust fmic BUT and here is the but.. it has NO intake, ECU and exhaust cam wheel... what I want to know is how much power can the stock bottom end handle??? I'm only guessing its stock and is there anyway of telling if I have forged pistons just by looking at the tops?? I will get a eftermarket ecu, adj cam wheels and a greedy intake... just not sure about the bottom end...... some one has spent alot of money on it in the past any help would be good

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/414087-rb25det-bottom-end/
Share on other sites

Search..plenty of threads on it.

But if you're lazy the answer is exactly 354.5 rwkw

f**k Simon stop spreading misinformation. Clowns like you are worse than idiots who start threads asking stupid questions.

The CORRECT figure is 354.6rwkw

You're welcome.

ok so I found out from the old owner that it is a built motor and has fordgies so thats good.. I also found out that it has 785cc Delphi/Rochester injectors and the Mallory fuel reg supports up to 1200hp.. just wanted to know if anyone can tell me what size this turbo is??

post-47149-0-79212300-1353492021_thumb.jpg

post-47149-0-88911500-1353492059_thumb.jpg

post-47149-0-68000500-1353492095_thumb.jpg

ok i found out the it a T04e with a 1.00 rear housing.... so thats staying on the bench....lol I bought a 35r off of a mate for $250 and hi 4" dump and all lines...happy with that. I also bought a forwared facing plenum and 80mm T/B for $400 and a Wolf 3D V4 that came off a R33 so will be easy to wire up for $500 so in the next few day when I get all the nuts and bolts ready i'll start putting it together..

have a good hard think about what your doing.. using cheap china parts to build a car to make power is not going to end well..

And then when they fail, as they will, you'll end up paying twice or more to buy more parts or do it right the 2nd time (rather than the first).

300rwkw+ on a budget never ends well long term.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...