Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The water piping for an RB's oil heat exchanger enters the from the rear water exit for the block (also the feed for the heater) and exist the exchanger into the water pump inlet post thermostat.

Here's a question, what location should we be getting our oil temperature from?

Should we be getting it from the bottom of the sump or post oil cooler as it enters the engine's main gallery?

You need to know where it is hottest. It is not important that you are providing it to the engine at a good temperature (post cooler). What is important is that you know how hot it actually gets. As such, the sump (or post oil pump sandwich plate) is the best location.

Or both, if you want to know everything!

Hah!

Question. When does oil break down?

Answer. When it is hot.

Second question. How do you know how hot it has gotten, if you haven't measured it when it was hot?

Second answer. You don't.

You shove "cool enough" oil into your engine and pat yourself on the back. But whilst hanging around in the main feed gallery, it gets hot. Maybe it gets hot enough that whilst it's actually in the journals it starts to crap itself. Oh well. So sad.

so the answer is measure it at its hottest?

... still dont know where we are taking the reading from....The sump, the filter housing, before the cooler if your using one????

im not 100% clear on the flow of oil through an RB engine

Hah!

Question. When does oil break down?

Answer. When it is hot.

Second question. How do you know how hot it has gotten, if you haven't measured it when it was hot?

Second answer. You don't.

You shove "cool enough" oil into your engine and pat yourself on the back. But whilst hanging around in the main feed gallery, it gets hot. Maybe it gets hot enough that whilst it's actually in the journals it starts to crap itself. Oh well. So sad.

Given your bearing dimensions are fixed the variables affecting the bearing performance are speed, flow rate and viscosity. Viscosity can double in 10 deg increments depending where are you are in the temp/viscosity range (log scale). The industrial scale bearings I'm involved with trip on 'feed' lube temperature, given an increase in temp of 5 deg above the trip point can drop the viscosity to a point where bearings fail (lube film is dependant on viscosity, load and speed). Ideally you want to know the temp at the bearing but in reality you have to settle for going as close to the bearing as possible. Oil is tested regularly and replaced based on the rate of deterioration (in most cases contamination happens first).

Now I'll ask you, how do you measure the maximum temp the oil reaches? At best you can measure the temp in the reservoir/sump or after the pump/before the filter, so using your argument - you still have no idea what the max oil temp is nor if the oil has reached a temp where it will break down. Your best of getting the oil tested to figure that part out.

is there really going to be that much temp difference between the bearing and the filter though?

I mean the split second it gets hot at the bearing surely couldn't do damage that couldn't be read at the sensor/filter and knowing what temp you should ease up on it which seems to be around 120...

Now I'll ask you, how do you measure the maximum temp the oil reaches? At best you can measure the temp in the reservoir/sump or after the pump/before the filter, so using your argument - you still have no idea what the max oil temp is nor if the oil has reached a temp where it will break down. Your best of getting the oil tested to figure that part out.

It is FAR more conservative and safe to measure the higher temperature rather than the lower temperature. Your industrial bearings are often just that....a bearing. Sure, they may be massive with massive loads on them. Sure, they may be running very fast. But they are seldom embedded within a bloody hot cast iron heat source as well. The lube oil usually flows via a nice hose from the remote pump to the bearing and the performance of the bearing under load is sufficiently well known by the manufacturer and/or commissioning engineer that they can tell the operator to trip it off based on ain inlet temperature because they know how hot it will heat up to. In our engines the bearings' oil feed is in an uncontrolled heater so you don't know how hot it is going in. If you measure it in the sump at 120°C then you know damn well that it had to have been at least that hot in the bearing itself. If you measure it at 105°C after the cooler.......you have no idea what the bearing has been running at. Just a wild guess. Could have been 140°C and breaking down for all you know.

Engineering is about identifying what is important, not just working from other examples.

Where does the standard temp sensor read from?

The heat exchanger where the oil filter mounts.... which is just before it goes into the engine. A couple of people here know what they are talking about.

Edited by bigmikespec

Engineering is about identifying what is important, not just working from other examples.

In the interests of maintaining my sanity I concede, but thanks for the tip - I'll be sure to pass it on to my grads :)

I don't see the zing.

With respect to the location of the oem temp sensor.....that one doesn't really matter where it is. There is no oil cooler in the equation (oil-water HX notwithstanding) and so the oil temperature will be about the same whether measured in the sump, after the pump, after the HX or after the filter. That example in no way nullifies my position.

The people who I supervise are not engineering graduates. They have PhDs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...