Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Alright guys, I tried searching couldn't find an answer for what I was looking for.

I'm going to run an external gate on my r33, I'm wondering if swapping between plumbing back and running screamer will it affect the tune?

I'd run screamer usually but if I run into trouble with the popo I obviously would have to plumb in.

Everything would be v band to make life easy between swapping a plumb pipe in or swapping to a screamer with a blank on the dump.

Would swapping between the two affect the way the car drives?

Merge the two a decent length down the exhaust and make the merge angle blunt as possible. It shouldn't effect the tune a great deal if the merge is okay.

I know there is guys who have back to backed with external gates and reckon they gain hp venting to atmosphere. I'd like to see how the merge was done in those examples

I didn't notice any difference plumbing mine back in at the cat..

.except the car is a shit load quieter and more enjoyable to drive now...screamers get boring real quik n a street car and the disadvantages far outweigh the benefits

I say yes as back pressure will increase with the plumb back......How much of a difference??? I dont know

If back pressure increases in the exhaust its due to the merge of the two gases not being correct. Not because the waste gate is plumbed back

If back pressure increases in the exhaust its due to the merge of the two gases not being correct. Not because the waste gate is plumbed back

If you plumb the waste gate in, you're pushing more gas down the exhaust, so it will always increase back pressure, even if the merge is perfect. If the exhaust is properly sized the increase will be negligible. If its too small, it will be significant.

The ammount of exhaust gas being bypassed on boost is not that great compared to the ammount required to drive the turbine.

Years ago I did a back to back on my race car with internal GTRS turbos and then the same turbos with external gates/screamers and welded up internal flaps. Made no power differnece but boost control was more steady over a long period (say ec main straight and Bathurst)

We ran it on the dyno twice and the tune was the same. All the lambda logging was the same too. Only differnece was the boost was a steady 28psi instead of a slight wave from 28-30psi.

A waste gate merged at 90deg to the main pipe or even 45deg to the main pipe is not much good but is the normal easiest way to do it.

You won't notice squat difference driving it around on the road if the merge is good.

Mine merges into the front of the cat body. So a 3inch front pipe and 2 inch screamer enter a 5inch body cat seperatly then exit into 3.5 inch exhaust...sound is sex on boost too... :)

Mine merges into the front of the cat body. So a 3inch front pipe and 2 inch screamer enter a 5inch body cat seperatly then exit into 3.5 inch exhaust...sound is sex on boost too... :)

The thing to look at is surface area not diameter.

Your 3in exhaust is 7.06in

Your 2in screamer is 3.14in

Total surface area of 10.20in

A 3.5 system has a surface of 9.62in

I can't see that being a problem as a 2inch screamer pipe is way overkill and you wouldn't be anywhere near its capacity.

Most 1.5in gates are adequate

So 3inch at 7.06in

1.5 screamer at 1.76

Total of 8.82in surface area

A 3 inch exhaust would Sufice and not be a restriction at most people's level if the merge is right

We've regularly used 1.5in gates on 400-450kw engines with no problems so I highly doubt the 1.5 screamer is at capacity on most people's 300ish kw setups

A 3.5 inch exhaust (which is typically what we use for anything 400kw +) would have a greater surface area than the dump and screamer pipe. It couldn't possibly be a restriction if the merge is done right.

My math might be off having done it on an I phone calculator but it appears correct.

area of a circle app(android)ftw!

twin 3" exhaust, nearly identical to 4" single.

also consider what youll use the car for.

alot of tracks in motorsport dont allow gate.

and you may have to run 2 tunes to make the most from it.

Ask your tuner about tunes.

I remember talking once to dvs jez, and he didn't sound confident on tuning a screamer for 95octane.

if it didn't make a difference, it wouldnt matter.

I run mine both ways, no problem.... :)

The Haltech would adjust for it no problem man.

How my old tuner explained it anyway, I asked if it could be done and he said with the Nistune it's a bit difficult but with something like the Link it would be easy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...