Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You and me both Joe.

I will also be using a full race manifold on a built 32 GT-R so I'll just see what state the crank is in when I pull it out as to whether I get a stroker or not.

Otherwise I will just rebuild my 26.

Should be a quick car.

What's the Goss on pistons rings and rods at the moment ?

I'm looking at JE pistons with carillo rods atm unless somebody stops me.

working under the assumption I don't end up needing the stroker kit.

Also bearings etc if anyone has any suggestions outside the usual ACL goodness.

There is nothing wrong with JE pistons and carrillo rods are awesome as well. As for bearings I use king bearings in my rb25 as well as the JE forged pistons. Any top name pistons are up to the task of abuse in rbxx engines. And everyone will differ in opinion. More come down to how well it's screwed together in my opinion.

Cheers Josh

my 2c? anything is useable in a mild build. buy whatever is cheap. I've used 5+ types of pistons and all have been equivalent.

If you want a billion horsepower it's different, if not it is the machining that matters most

I want 600hp at the wheels, would you consider that enough to warrant more research Dunc ?

is this enough power to warrant the stroker ?

Keep your suggestions coming !

Power won't warrant a stroker.

Where you want the power will.

Your budget really will depend on what you buy. No point buying carillos if they aren't needed. $$$ for other parts.

Nitto do combos with rods and JE pistons

Like Duncan said, more often than not its the machining that is the make or break factor.

Edited by jangles

I want 600hp at the wheels, would you consider that enough to warrant more research Dunc ?

is this enough power to warrant the stroker ?

Keep your suggestions coming !

Plenty of good pistons out there Mitch. Pay more attention to the gudgeon than the piston for that power level.

600hp = 450kw at the fly = ~350kw at the wheels.....pretty normal power level as far as I'm concerned, and it certainly doesn't need anything special.

I'd be more careful over 400-450atw.

600hp = 450kw at the fly = ~350kw at the wheels.....pretty normal power level as far as I'm concerned, and it certainly doesn't need anything special.

Yeah Dunc, I want 600hp/450kw at the wheels.

wondering whether I'll need the stroker for driveability.

aren't the pins usually supplied ?

I'll be getting Chiltons to do the machining.

I'd be more careful over 400-450atw.

There is a nitto 2.7ltr stroker short block for sale in the for sale section. With 450kw Atws more capacity is always going to be better. Just depends what you want to use the car for and how much money you want to spend. It'll be roughly 15k+ for a decent built stroker in my experiences with mates builds. You could always put a dirty 30 in. After that I doubt you would ever look back.

Cheers Josh

There is a nitto 2.7ltr stroker short block for sale in the for sale section. With 450kw Atws more capacity is always going to be better. Just depends what you want to use the car for and how much money you want to spend. It'll be roughly 15k+ for a decent built stroker in my experiences with mates builds. You could always put a dirty 30 in. After that I doubt you would ever look back.

Cheers Josh

Hey Mate,

once you've overbored a normal 26 there isn't really much to displacement to be gained by going to a 2.7.

A 2.8 is the smallest stroker I would consider.

in my situation the only costs I have are parts and machining.

through my research I found the RB30 to be less cost effective than a 2,8 stroker or a normal 26.

Unless people know cheaper places to buy stuff than I have found, which is one of the points of this thread lol.

Cheers,

Mitch.

A well built 2.6 will give more power then needed on the street, JEs and Carillos are more then upto the power you want as are all the others mentioned so whatever you feel comfortable forking out for will work just fine

but if the crank has to be replaced anyway then for the extra cost a stroker is the way to go for the extra capacity, I am nearly finished with a rb2630 build, capacity is king but how much, I think its size v cost v hassle, if I did it again the BC 2.9 would be the way I went

I have brought from those ebay guys before with no hassles

A well built 2.6 will give more power then needed on the street, JEs and Carillos are more then upto the power you want as are all the others mentioned so whatever you feel comfortable forking out for will work just fine

but if the crank has to be replaced anyway then for the extra cost a stroker is the way to go for the extra capacity, I am nearly finished with a rb2630 build, capacity is king but how much, I think its size v cost v hassle, if I did it again the BC 2.9 would be the way I went

I have brought from those ebay guys before with no hassles

Thanks dude,

I am leaning towards one of those strokers.

I will start to compile a list for all of you to critique.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...