Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok i installed some GTR camshafts in my RB20 today. also fitted a new timing belt.

so here are my probs.

when i installed the cams i noticed the inlet cam was much harder to turn than the exhaust cam when making small adjustments to align the cam gear marks for no.1 TDC

after thinking maybe the new cam was bent i pulled it and installed the standard cam, but it felt just as stiff to adjust, so back in went the GTR cam.

Now my problem is the car cannot hold idle without droping rpm and then dies

now when i try to start the car it pretty much dies immediately.

is this due to the "lumpy" camshaft or something else?

any advice or help would be much appreciated.

Ben.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42478-camshaft-instalation-probs-help/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

A bit of a stupid question (I'm not sure how the cam is mounted etc..), but did you put the cam mounts/craddles back in the same position??

I replaced a cam on an old car years ago and it did the same thing, found out that the mounts/craddles that hold the cam in place were put on in the wrong order (my bad !!) which put a fair bit of load on the motor cause they were slightly out of wack.... I ended up needing to get them line bored to fix it...

Not sure if this is your problem, maybe someone else can confirm.

J

I would say, if your belt is on right, marks match up, all hoses back in the right spot (eg. Crank Reciculation Thingi) and CAS on the right mark(by eye), reset the ecu and try starting it and holding the idle up for a couple of mins and see if it help but other than that i'm stumped.

dunno if that is any good tho

yeah i have tried everything everyone has mentioned here.

the only thing i think could be causing it is the fact the inlet cam felt much stiffer to adjust than the exhaust. it was noticably harder to adjust, i think the engine is having trouble turning it over at idle and hence stalling.

the only thing is, when i noticed this problem when fitting the GTR cam i decided to throw the standard item back in position to check there was nothing wrong with the GTR cam. But the standard one felt just as stiff...

i dont think i dropped anything in, i was pretty meticulous doing this job.

there are no strange noises to suggest there is a spanner in the works (literally).

I only can think of a few things that are causing this.

- either the fact the in.cam was difficult to turn is causing the problem.

- the timing belt has jumped a tooth or so on start up (i doubt this)

Considering they are a very mild cam upgrade compared to the standard items the ECU should be able to handle them.

so im stumped here.

i think ill pull the whole lot out and go back the the drawing board.

Hi bbenny, check the clearances (feeler gauges) between the cam lobes and the buckets, if there is a bent valve you should see large clearances that the hydraulics can't take up. If it is not missing, then I doubt this is an issue.

You really need a timing light to confirm the ignition timing. Have you tried advancing the CAS and seeing what effect it has on the idle? We usually have to run a bit more advanced igntion timing at low rpm with aftermarket cams.

hey sydneykid

i invested in a timing lamp today, i did adjust the CAS and it was a little better when advanced but still wouldnt hold idle

it doesnt backfire or sound bad at all, when i drove the car around the block (taking it easy) it was extremely sluggish, i found that response was really poor at low rpm, even if i fully opened the throttle nothing would happen for some time till it reached 3000rpm but even after that point it was very slow.

ylwgtr: i dont think ihave bent any valves because at no time did i rotate any of the cam shafts - i only noticed the stiffness of the in. cam when making a minor adjustment to align the pully marks.

thanks for all the advice here guys, keep it comming, i will begin to pull it all apart again tonight and try see if i have missed anything. if it still doesnt work after rebuild no.2 i will throw the standard cams back in and see if i still have the problem.

sydneykid: did all your installations have good idle or did you have similar problems??

Hi Benny,

I just finished my cam swap as well this past week and the car has been down since with the exact same problem you are describing.

The timing marks are dead on, all 6 plugs are getting spark, and there's PLENTY of fuel, I know this because the plugs almost instantly foul after a couple attempts at idle. I have noticed that when it is colder outside the car will idle until it warms up a bit, my ECU is now pointing the finger at the coolant temp sensor. I have also performed a comp check of all 6 cylinders and they all read the same value, I am under the assumption that if there are bent valves then the comp gauge should not hold pressure (I could be wrong, it's happened before). Of course if I have valves bent in one cylinder then somehow I have valves bent in all six and I think I would've noticed something, a noise perhaps. I have checked everything I can think of at this point and have been using my wife's S14 as a taxi lately. I have ohmed out the harnesses to the AFM, swapped AFM's, CAS's, and ignitors with a friend's known good parts.

But I am so glad someone else has performed this swap and seen the exact same problem as I have. You are not alone...

I'm going to replace my coolant temp sensor tonight after work and see if it makes it better, my car has idled exactly 3 times since the swap and everytime its been after it was a chilly rainy evening.

I'll re-post after I check out this temp sensor issue, hopefully with some positive results.

Of course any other ideas/suggestions are appreciated :rofl:

-Matt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...