Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, after getting my RB20 up to around the 350hp mark with relativley simple mods, it looks like it has cracked a ringland and is loosing compression on clylinder #1, and getting some major blow buy.. After only 116k! Needlees to say im a bit pissed off, but i put it down to major miss treatmeant before i brought it.

Anyway i managed to souce a mint RB20DET replacement for $300 that i will swap over with the current set up on the weekend.

Now i intend to rebuild the other motor into a 2.2, and want to know if anyone else here has undertaken this?

Basically over a year or so ill be slowly doing bits at a time. I have been looking into the use of toyota 4AGZE pistons(prepped) (taking bore out to around 82mm) and modifying head to suit. They are similar length to the RB20 ones.

I will be using a TO4 with t3 exhaust wheel, off a RB25 making around 500-500hp, externally gated. Obviuosly the head will be port/ polished and cammd..

Im aiming for around 280-300 rwkw (NZ dyno)

Any input would be great (esp on the use of GZE pistons) and anything else that will be required ie sump baffling and oil system etc..

Cheers

32GT

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42510-building-rb20-into-rb22/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks for the replys, i have a RB25 crank but i might look at getting custom forged pistons to suit and do it that way, i have seen that tomei kit but as always money is an object in the long run...

Joel, as you know from SDU i aint interested in a RB25, each to there own. Plus a 2.2 is somthing different.

Yer I don't know from SDU as I havn't been there for quite some time.

Really it is pretty pointless doing up a RB20 when you can have no legal isses etc with the RB25. 2.2litres is going to be bugger all and at the end of the day if you are looking at making some serious power (over 250rwkw) then the RB20 is going ot be as laggy as hell. Not good for the street.

 

Yer I don't know from SDU as I havn't been there for quite some time.

 

Really it is pretty pointless doing up a RB20 when you can have no legal isses etc with the RB25. 2.2litres is going to be bugger all and at the end of the day if you are looking at making some serious power (over 250rwkw) then the RB20 is going ot be as laggy as hell. Not good for the street.

True i havent seen you on SDU for a while :) But then again after looking around here it makes SDU look pretty inferior as majority of these users are ex SDU lol

But anyway, i have reasearched the 2.2, and looked at the results they are getting in japan. and the 2.2 and 2.4 for the build cost is blowing everything else away. They turbo i have is designed for a 2litre and by 3900rpm will have some serious pull. I like how the RB20 goes and have found it cheap to get good power out of, have not met many other RB25 powerd vehicles that can beat it.. So ill stick with my RB20 Block and have a play. There is a guy here with a 300rwkw RB20DET on standard internals running low 11's with alot of traction issues, so they are definately able to do it - keep in mind this is not a daily driver.

Hi R32 GT, RB26 standard crank and rods are the go, used with 82 mm pistons they give 2,335 cc's. :aroused:

The reason why you are beating many RB25's, is not that they are RB25's. It is because they are usually in R33 GTST's that weigh a lot more than a R32 GTST. Given equal car weight, a 300 rwkw RB25 will be faster than a 300 rwkw RB20 because the RB25 will have higher average power. Try a 300 rwkw RB31DET and you will get smashed. Max power is only one measure, and it is far from the "best" measure at that.

I have all the bits necessary to make an RB24DET, and I might get around to it one day. But the reason I haven't to date, is because it was cheaper and easier to get 300+ rwkw out of an RB31DET. And it has a shoot load higher average power than I could ever get out of an RB24DET.

But don't let anyone talk you out of it, if you really want to do it. You just need to be aware of the choices. :)

Yer I'm ex-SDU.. I joined many years ago now. :)

But yer if its not a daily driver have a play the rev's will be nice to play with down at the track.

After seeing a RB20 head next to the RB25 head the valves on the rb20 look like little toy valves. :)

Convert the head to solids and get the thing reving. :)

No one loves the RB20 :) My brothers Bertram needs a new anchor, apparently thats all my Rb20 is good for :)

Joel, i agree with what you are sauyign to a certain extent, but have you been in an RB20 with 250-300rwkws... i dont think they are as laggy as you think... try 1.2bar by 4,800rpm which by GTR talk is when the average 2530 setup come on full boost....i cant argue about the characteristics of the power delivery though

RB20s rock :) !!!! Go the 82mm bore, run 8.8-9.0:1 compression and blow all those RB25 away :)

I havn't been in a RB20 with 250-300rwkw.

I'm basing my experience on the how mine was when I slapped a larger turbo on it for a little while and found it to be slower where I need it to be quicker. It made 1bar around 4100rpm which unless I really reved the thing constantly it wouldn't go anywhere. Almost a little embarrasing as ppls would look over with that boy racer look at you. :)

I know of one bloke who made nearly 250rwkw on a RB20. That was on full boost (17-18psi I think it was) by around 5000rpm. I remember him telling me it was too laggy and generally had the on off feel which = lack of traction.

But wasnt your larger turbo a VG30? Im happy with how my car drives and performs, im wasting money on my current setup just so i KNOW what a well setup RB20 with 420hp turbo drives like.

Im also spending the money so i can sell the turbo complete with ECU, injectors, AFM, cooler, manifold/wastegate. Unfortunately you cant just throw a big turbo on the std manifold and make big power, but if you pay a bit off attention to all the bolt ons they go really well with more off boost power/performance...which is a good thing as you do have to wait that little bit longer for boost to chase the horizon!

Just trying to balance the books a little...not start an argument

hehe yer it was a crappy vg30.

I've also since had a rb25 turbo on it which made it a little more laggy.

Really i don't like it any more laggy than it is with the rb20 stocker on it.

If I was aiming for around 400hp I would have stuck with the rb20 no doubt.

But always a but I got greedy and wanted more. :)

My other half is starting to harrase me how much I'm spending. lol..

Just had the car resprayed so that cost another few thousand dollars.

Then it will get defected and not allowed back on the road lol.. :)

yes roy you have a good point if you use quality stuff you will get the results too many peopel put price first and suffer witha compromise I didnt this time and have no regrets plus as you say you have a nice package to sell when you off load the car.

go the 2.2 id sit down and think about it the tomei piston kit isnt that dear as they have spent the time developing the whole pakage. they have the compression right etc the guy I knew with one pull the motor down 2 years later and got great money for the pistons casue they were still in great nick. he was running an rx6 turbo the car was making 600 hp or so.

meggala

I like how the RB20 goes and have found it cheap to get good power out of, have not met many other RB25 powerd vehicles that can beat it.. So ill stick with my RB20 Block and have a play. There is a guy here with a 300rwkw RB20DET on standard internals running low 11's with alot of traction issues, so they are definately able to do it - keep in mind this is not a daily driver.

I hear some whale defending necessary!

You have hardly any other RWD skylines around which can keep up with yours, and from memory the ones that have at all are 33s or 34s (ie, RB25 powered). From memory the only R33 you have raced at the drags beat you - and all the other 33s around here are virtually stock (at the moment), and all this is with the RB25 in the heavier body. Also, dyno figures wise - the R33s on average are way higher powered at CF than the R32s, yours with bigger turbo, S-AFC etc was in the middle of the cat-back exhaust and pod filter R33 brigade - so the RB25s are actually making more power too. An R33 with a road tuned S-AFC and bigger turbo would be in a whole different power/performance class.

The GTSt you mention was doing low 12s on slicks, and needed NOS because with the RB20 was unable to spool the turbo well enough for a decent launch - and has a built RB25 now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...