Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just reading through your build up now 34geeteetee.

Somthing along the lines of the bolt ons im trying to find!

Impressive mate.

You may get a few stupid questions pm'd through to you. just giving u the heads up!

Just reading through your build up now 34geeteetee.

Somthing along the lines of the bolt ons im trying to find!

Impressive mate.

You may get a few stupid questions pm'd through to you. just giving u the heads up!

Haha i get plenty of questions and do what i can to answer them, none are normally stupid as we all start somewhere! I still learn on here most days :)

  • Like 1

I dont know... with the .82 rear and larger front the power delivery is still not going to be as brutal as the 2835...

however in saying this I have not driven a 3076 .82 with external gate on an RB25... but i still cant see it having the agression of the HKS unit, which for me is where the fun is at.

(i have driven an ex gate 3076 .82 on an RB25/30 however... shit was like driving on ice)

you would like mine...I dunno if you been in BIrds car, its pretty quick and very smooth, but mines alot more aggresive :devil:

its a bit more nice without the screamer now..

definately more fun if you ask me though it is hard to tell which will be faster without racing em though

I dont know... with the .82 rear and larger front the power delivery is still not going to be as brutal as the 2835...

however in saying this I have not driven a 3076 .82 with external gate on an RB25... but i still cant see it having the agression of the HKS unit, which for me is where the fun is at.

(i have driven an ex gate 3076 .82 on an RB25/30 however... shit was like driving on ice)

Like for like the cast GT compressor wheels are typically apparently nearly 30% heavier than the HTA ones - I'd go out on a limb and say that the GT3076R-HTA wheel is probably lighter than the GT3071R (and GT2835) wheel. Obviously you then have the .82 (as you mentioned) to factor in, but then you also have the greater wheel efficiency of the more modern design... quite a few swings and roundabouts there - but I am more thinking about the net result of the conversion than the initial spool. I personally loved the .82a/r GT3076R, and the HTA is only likely to be an improvement :)

Haha i get plenty of questions and do what i can to answer them, none are normally stupid as we all start somewhere! I still learn on here most days :)

Haha thanks mate much appreciated!

you would like mine...I dunno if you been in BIrds car, its pretty quick and very smooth, but mines alot more aggresive :devil:

definately more fun if you ask me though it is hard to tell which will be faster without racing em though

Mate do you have a build thread?

Dyno shows 4000ish on high boost runs..... Feels more lively on the street that what the graph shows though :)

that's what I meant... 2835 was up and running by about 3250...

I dont doubt the 3076 makes the power... but i reckon it's never going to be as responsive as the smaller 2835 no matter what the configuration

that's what I meant... 2835 was up and running by about 3250...

I dont doubt the 3076 makes the power... but i reckon it's never going to be as responsive as the smaller 2835 no matter what the configuration

No argument there... :)

Some info on the one result Lithium mentioned was in here -

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/417832-precision-pt6766-vs-forcedperformance-gt3794r-hta-dyno-shootout/page-3

And there was another thread too "370kw" in the title i think it was! Interesting!

I also noticed there was a VQ result to be expected but i never saw anything posted about it since...

Do you have a dyno plot of full boost by 3250? How much boost was that?

not on me... I can show you one of my old engine with 98 and e85 that is pretty close, but that was a 200,000+ motor and eventually spun a biggie.

lol thanks! ill look it up!

Looking at the plazmaman plenum, the different size throttle bodies. How big is to big? or is needed etc?

I run the smallest one they have! I think 66mm or something from memory!

not on me... I can show you one of my old engine with 98 and e85 that is pretty close, but that was a 200,000+ motor and eventually spun a biggie.

That is not a bad innings! Mine is making the power on a 150k unopened motor :ph34r:

And there was another thread too "370kw" in the title i think it was! Interesting!

I also noticed there was a VQ result to be expected but i never saw anything posted about it since...

VQ is still sitting on workshop floor, but we have since turned back to utilising the existing SR instead :) Wanting something more brutal than linear.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't think the shuffle can damage the turbos. It only happens at low shaft speeds and loads. It's just annoying (to some people - others are tickled by the effect) and it quite possibly reduces spool performance a little bit.
    • Oh dear. The panel beating needs to be done before the filler work. Do you have a photo of the dent before you started? Hard enough to not flex and only hit the high spots?  What do you mean it was just temporary? 
    • Can u check this way it works for power supply?
    • These coils draw 10amps that what i read online
    • I appreciate the detailed explanation, think I understand now. I spent the better part of last night reading what I could about shuffle and potential solutions. I had replaced the OEM twin turbo pipe with an alternate Y pipe that is separated further away from the turbo. The current one is from HKS and I had a previous pipe that was separated even further away, both have shuffle. I had heard that a divider can be welded in to the OEM pipe to remove turbulence, and figure that aftermarket pipes that are more separated would achieve the same thing. From what I read, most people with -10 turbos get shuffle due to their size, though it's a bit less common with -5s on a standard RB26. I think Nismoid mentioned somewhere it's because OEM recirculation piping is common in Australia with -5 cars. It seems that the recommendation tends to vary between a few options, which I've ordered in what I think is most feasible for me:  1. Retune the MAP or boost controller to try to eliminate shuffle 2. Install OEM recirculation piping 3. Something called a 'balance pipe' welded onto the exhaust manifolds. I don't know if kits for this are available, seems like pure fabrication work 4. simply go single turbo My current layout is as follows: Garrett 2860 -5s HKS Racing Suction intake MAF delete pipes HKS racing chamber intake piping hard intercooler piping,  ARC intercooler HKS SSQV BOV and pipe Haltech 2500 elite ECU and boost solenoid/controller HPI dump pipes OEM exhaust manifolds HKS VCAM step 1 and supporting head modifications Built 2.6 bottom end All OEM recirculation piping was removed, relevant areas sealed off I'll keep an eye out for any alternative solutions but can get started with this.  Only other question is, does shuffle harm the turbo (or anything else)? It seems like some people say your turbo shafts will explode because of the opposing forces after a while and others say they just live with it and adjust their pedal foot accordingly. 
×
×
  • Create New...