Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

Im sure this has been covered before but I cant find any info can some one point me in the right direction please.

Atm I have a pretty much stock r32 gtr with a link v4 ecu and a dump pipe back exhaust. I have a gtx3071 off my other car that has a .63 exhaust housing on it and im thinking about throwing it on a cheap manifold and maxing out the injectors and seeing how it goes. If it works ok then I will go bigger injectors, fuel pump, pressure reg, e85, 6boost manifold maybe a bigger exhaust housing .82 or 1.06? etc..

The question I want to know is am I wasting my time putting this turbo? Should I just save my pennys and go for something else? Any recommendations?

Any real info would be much appreciated, cheers, lozz

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426028-rb26-with-a-gtx3071-63/
Share on other sites

My SR20 is making 290kw on 98 with a GTX3071 0.82 on 18psi ext gate. MickO was I/G wasn't it?

If you get your hands on a 0.82 housing and I think you'll have a nice 300-340kw car without pushing too hard.

Thanks guys I will throw it on and if it works but i want more power than I will up the exhaust housing and see how that goes. At the moment it is an internally gated housing but if I go bigger I will get an external gate housing

Cheers, lozz

I have a turbo off my other car. Cheap second hand manifold I can get for $150. And I have all the necessary bits and pieces to put it all together myself i cant see it costing to much. If I like the set up then I want to do it right. Eg good manifold and maybe go up a size in exhaust housing for more power

with a .82 ewg this would be pretty fun on the street.

Theres no harm in trying the existing housing if you can do all the work yourself, but I'm sure you will need to pay for a dump and other bits on top of the tune. It could prove costly.

consider getting yourself a manifold and .82 straight up. That way if it doesn't make enough power for you you can simply swap it for a larger GT30 based turbo and retune then. Bolt for bolt. Look at the recent FP 3076 HTA results for example.

that is how I would do it anyway.

I have a dump pipe I just need to modify it a bit to fit my car. But I am happy to spend the money on the manifold and exhaust housing if I can do it once and do it right.

Can anyone tell what exhaust housing I should go for then if I want to get somewhere around 300kw maybe more if I run e85. other mods I plan on doing is injectors, fpr, fuel pump and maybe cams.

with a .82 ewg this would be pretty fun on the street.

Theres no harm in trying the existing housing if you can do all the work yourself, but I'm sure you will need to pay for a dump and other bits on top of the tune. It could prove costly.

consider getting yourself a manifold and .82 straight up. That way if it doesn't make enough power for you you can simply swap it for a larger GT30 based turbo and retune then. Bolt for bolt. Look at the recent FP 3076 HTA results for example.

that is how I would do it anyway.

:action-smiley-069: Awwwwwwwww yeah!

  • Like 1

I have tried a ~ 0.63 housing and a 0.86 housing on the same turbo and same engine. Made the same peak power but moved the curve a long way with far poorer response with the bigger housing. So if you are running E85 then go the smaller housing. If you are running pump the tune wont seem to handle the back pressure as well. If its a track car that is going to see sustained high revs and load then perhaps make sure you are not giving it a gob whack of boost when at the track like you can on the street.

I am now running a T67 with a 10cm (~0.74) housing but once a few things are fixed on my car will be gong back to the 8cm housing (~0.63) Thats on a 2.5L 6cyl

There are drawbacks with smaller housings and larger ones. Just because your setup made no extra top end bumping up the housing size doesn't mean there is no benefit.

I noticed the transient response was better with the larger housing, torque should increase as should power if there are no restrictions, and obviously there will be less manifold heat and pressure. A couple of hundred rpm response lost isn't a huge price to pay. For a track car the larger housing is an obvious choice I would have thought.

E85 doesn't change the back pressure, it just masks the effects imo.

Thats my point. E85 masks the problems associated with higher than desirable back pressure. I agree that I preferred the way the 12cm housing performed on the TD06-20G on a 2.5L but 100% made for a slower car. The 8cm spooled up and hammered in a heart beat. The 12cm made for a lazier thing to drive which is a subjective like it or laothe it thing

The below graph shows all the same turbo. Its an RB20 with 8cm housing. Rb25 with 8cm housing and RB25 with 12cm housing. The 12cm housing tunes were pretty rough and ready and boost curves not stressed over. They were slapped on , minimal ignition and just initial power runs to see the characteristics of the turbos before swapping and changing setups and cams etc. But you could get a feel which way it was headed

Not all sized turbos and setups would give the same result...but for me a street GTR with occassional track work then I think based on my experience with the smaller TD06-20G and 8cm and 12cm housings I would go the smaller housing.

post-462-0-87943800-1369798945_thumb.jpg

Are those two setups exactly the same turbo? Probably irrelevant, GT30s and TD06s are quite different beasts - an RB25 (let alone an RB26) with a .82a/r GTX3071R would make an RB20 with a .63a/r GTX3071R look silly at every point in the rev range, I'd put money on it. I'd strongly suggest the .82 over the .63 in this case, personally.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...