Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

AS FOR YOU CO*K HEAD WATCH WHAT YOU TYPE!

I think it was a pretty fair call in terms of what he meant, it's pretty low to take a company that has put thousands of hours into R&D and proven results and then just copy the design to save a few dollers... Stao was pretty clear in his statement and i think he was pretty fair too!

AS FOR YOU CO*K HEAD WATCH WHAT YOU TYPE!

Stao you should try create some new wheels that match ir beat the hta comp wheels as Lithium mentioned. I always prefer to go local if I can. I just dont know what to do im not using the plain new gt3076 I have in the shed.

Don't drip stuff which is not relevant to this thread into it - this is about FP HTA turbos, not Hypergear, and not anyone copying or trying to compete with HTA. A relevant comparison (whether the HTA or the competitor outperforms doesn't matter - just something informative) would be good, be very interesting to get a Hypergear vs HTA comparison on the same dyno and setup for example... but otherwise, its just spam.

Get in touch with FP, or GTPumps - Josh.... pretty sure GTPumps do hybrids using HTA compressors, so maybe able to help.

Don't drip stuff which is not relevant to this thread into it - this is about FP HTA turbos, not Hypergear, and not anyone copying or trying to compete with HTA. A relevant comparison (whether the HTA or the competitor outperforms doesn't matter - just something informative) would be good, be very interesting to get a Hypergear vs HTA comparison on the same dyno and setup for example... but otherwise, its just spam.

Get in touch with FP, or GTPumps - Josh.... pretty sure GTPumps do hybrids using HTA compressors, so maybe able to help.

Would the quality and response of the GTpumps match with what FP are doing. Otherwise it would probably be worth it to just go straight to FP

The extra bit of boost is worth it in the mid isn't it. Must be impossible to keep it stuck down.

A lot of extra boost for not much gain... Honestly on 20psi its enough of a handful :D

I find it interesting that FP no longer offer twin scroll housings........

In other news - FP have released a Super 99 HTA turbo, a 103lb/min T3 flanged (hopefully they release other flange versions - but still) turbo capable of >1000hp. MENTAL!

http://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=FP&Product_Code=NTFPSUPER99&Category_Code=Turbo-FP



Oh, right... when the SUPER 94 isnt enough... lol :woot:

Edited by Tonba

I find it interesting that FP no longer offer twin scroll housings........

Oh, right... when the SUPER 94 isnt enough... lol :woot:

The super 94 is never enough! I am thinking of a super 99 for the van :P

34geetee, pitty it wont hold boost, what boost control you have?

Can make it hold boost if we really wanted too but no point creating the extra heat etc....

Adam explained it too me but it was over my head, i just smiled and nodded lol.... Basically it was done for longevity of the turbo and engine....

I had HKS EVC 5 and now Greddy Profec B II, funnily enough despite what all the reviews say the Greddy is better than the HKS on my car!

Matt cant your haltech control boost as well? May I ask why you use the greddy?

Josh

Yes the haltech can if the solenoid is added, we have always stuck with external boost control though, it was a decision made during the build and there was reasoning, i cant remember what it was though lol

Interesting - when I was looking around at boost controllers I found the Blitz Dual SBC seemed to be the overall best respected by people I trusted. With my playing around with cars so far I by far like "decent" aftermarket ECU in-built boost control setups... ie, the G4 Link boost control has been brilliant for me and I'd assume the Haltech would be no worse. Why not use that?

Interesting - when I was looking around at boost controllers I found the Blitz Dual SBC seemed to be the overall best respected by people I trusted. With my playing around with cars so far I by far like "decent" aftermarket ECU in-built boost control setups... ie, the G4 Link boost control has been brilliant for me and I'd assume the Haltech would be no worse. Why not use that?

I honestly dont remember man, it was a reason that i just cant recall lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...