Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How did it go?

Also, as per his o2 sensor thread, it is currently being tuned with no air temp sensor in place (link ecu with a map)

What do you think of that Lithium?

Edited by Ben C34

Cos I'm a mad detective I am going to say spark issues. (He is chasing coils)

stalker much! lol. yer thats correct, coil pack was knackered. got some spitfires and all good. Hopefully find out in the next couple hours.

although there is a problem that wont be fixed this time so wont be a decent reading anyway id imagine

Yer i got my wires crossed. i got word that i needed a sensor from someone who spoke to someone who spoke to someone and the info finally got back to me. I thought they said o2 sensor. In fact was was needed was a temp sensor. and rushing to finish it up for this weekend i didnt have a time to do it with it being in tuning last night... So as soon as the weekend is over will install one and go again anyway

Edited by Adz2332

Also, as per his o2 sensor thread, it is currently being tuned with no air temp sensor in place (link ecu with a map)

What do you think of that Lithium?

Well, that's obviously not ideal. Fortunately PV=nRT, so there is no need for the tune to be a complete throwaway at all. Datalog and keep an eye on IAT etc, if it HAS to go ahead a switched on (hurhurhur) tuner will at least be able to factor that in and make some compromise to ensure that if an IAT sensor gets introduced later then things don't go insane, while also providing a tune which while compromised is usable.

haha i have no idea what any of that is..... but will post results when it comes to hand.

And then after the weekend ill get it installed and go again.. especially for a $30 part.... My lack of knowledge and Chinese whispers got me confused or i would have already had it done

Haha yeah it seems I don't really know what I am talking about either, so don't listen to me!!! :)

Good luck with the tuning, I hope it goes as well as can be expected! Should be able to still get a pretty good performance out of it, even if short on it's potential!

Having problems with fuel. Fuel pump isnt drawing enough to make it work to capacity.

Plus a couple other minor issues.

So for the sake of the weekend its tuned to 16.5psi and 335kws

So.weekend on, but car not sorted. Gee owning cars are fun

Thanks guys. A bunch of little things to tidy up but guess that what happens when rush to finish up.

Theres a vaccum or boost leak somewhere so laggy. But good enough to have some fun on the weekend

Thanks mate

Unsure its an elimination thing not a timed thing.... But with it not running properly and boost coming on so late all i was doing was frying the slicks for the most part.

But it took care of a heap of the V8 boys. Cant wait to get it running well...

I did see that was coming up, ill give this one a miss till its sorted, but will give that a crack asap!

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...

E85 mate

decided its easier to get a second hand carbon boot when another comes available.

the lexen i havent done anything about but will soon. if you search on here there are a couple good options.

Thinking just for now rear window and side 1/4s

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...