Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I agree to some extent Artz, but I have seen dangerous hack jobs out there that scare the hell outta me. Can you imagine what may happen if one let go on an unsuspecting driver? Especially if map sensored...

I refuse to do them, as I don't have an oven large enough to pre-heat the plenum for decent penetration, and for the exact reason I mentioned above. Even welding in a secondary injector boss on my plenum was stressful enough for me.

I can't agree enough with GTSBOY. Just my opinion and I'm far from a engineer. But Nissan made things the way they are for a reason. Cut and shut is a no go. Plazmaman FTW....

Josh.

lol...fair enough..in this industry its another shitty RB motor that's gumma die sooner or later anyway...

With an attitude like this it's no wonder people kill motors.

"Cut and shut plenum she'll be right mate"

"The air will get in there somehow it'll be right mate"

"Give me a rich power tune she'll be right mate"

"I fitted one and my engine is 'fine' mate"

As an engineer myself I feel sorry for GTSBOY in this discussion. When you are actually designing something properly, "she'll be right" is an omission you don't know what the f&ck you're on about. He's doing his best to share knowledge and coming up against "let's bolt these 2 things together and see what happens".

RB's have a lot of margin in the design, that's why we see unopened RB25DET's doing 300rwkw all day long. If done PROPERLY there is no reason why this can't be reliable and have good longevity. But stick a shitty plenum in it, do a quick tune at 10:1 that ends up washing down the bores with petrol and you end up with a motor that eventually dies. It's the margin that lets you "she'll be right" it and you will get away with it.. for a while.. but the engine is not happy.

Ok..

Lets discuss. "Nissan designed it that way for a reason"

Nissan designed alot of things for a reason, most of which are modified by some of you at some point...so maybe we should stop modifying everything!

Anyway I will gladly retract any argument and admit they are omissions of my lack of knowledge, when I see some factual evidence that these plenums are detrimental to engine health which it seems none of you are yet to provide..

And for the record "she'll be right" Is commonly referred to reference a job done right ..unless of course you have a stick firmly implanted in your rectal area then it becomes a term associated with those who make themselves feel better or try to prove their point by the putting down of others..

I am not here to attack anyones character,I am simply providing another point of view ;)

  • Like 1

Ok..

Lets discuss. "Nissan designed it that way for a reason"

Nissan designed alot of things for a reason, most of which are modified by some of you at some point...so maybe we should stop modifying everything!

Nissan's priorities and the enthusiasts' priorities are somewhat different. Nissan wants to sell as many cars as possible and get as little warranty work in return, and they also have to pass pesky legal things like emissions and safety legislation. Fuel economy is also an important part of a car's marketing. Enthusiasts want to get as much power out as possible, so a lot of those compromises Nissan makes goes out the window.

My point is that when you throw a cut and shut plenum, big turbo and some random injectors onto an RB, go to your tuner and pay as little as possible for a tune because you spent it all on mods, that you shouldn't be surprised that maybe the tuner gets close to your power goal but your emissions are woeful, so's your fuel economy and the motor doesn't last anywhere near as long as it should.

The big problem with cut and shut plenums is upsetting the balance of airflow between cylinders. Of course, if you simply throw fuel at the motor so that your average AFR is rich then the leanest cylinder (typically #6 since the air has momentum and will tend to flow along the back wall of a front-facing plenum) will still be OK. But the engine is definitely far from optimised. This is where it comes down to "doing it right" with the proper knowledge and just slapping a bunch of parts together with a power figure in mind and nothing else. As GTSBoy has said, invariably when people say "FFP works" you ask them if they've had individual cylinder EGT measurement on their exhaust manifold and the answer is "no" - they just threw enough fuel at it to keep it more or less happy and moved on to the next customer.

What GTSTboy, Kinks and others who agreed with them said is all plausible, but again so are the arguments which disagree. To say that Nissan designed something for a reason and thats that is nonesene as far as I am concerned. The last RB25 was built what, almost 2 decades ago now and the requirements and market undoubtedly changed by now. Almost every part on a nissan is replacable with aftermarket parts these days and some can simply be modified as is the case here.

The bottom line is this, unless someone has proven results on a dyno accross the rev range, no argument on here is substantiated. This is a really good discussion and if anyone has something else to add.........C'MON DOWN!!!!

I have seen two RB20s that died rather nastily with the same cut'n'shut plenum. After the second death, when the third engine went into the car, some thermocouples were installed into the exhaust manifold and some rather frightening differences in temperatures demonstrated. These differences were not linked to the injectors (as these were swapped around and also cleaned and flow tested as part of the ensuing paranoia). And when an unmolested RB20 plenum was put back on (with a Gibson style pipe to hook it up to the cooler piping on a temporary basis) the temperature differences all went away.

This was 16 years ago. The science hasn't changed since then. The only thing that has changed is whether the bodgy mod to the plenum gets the lucky angle or the unlucky angle. Whether the throttle body is set to swing one way or the other way, or any of a half dozen other reasons why one hacked plenum won't work at all while another will.

As much as Cut n Shut are uneasy on the eye and look like they will do bad things to your engine

post-22302-0-97852600-1377068539_thumb.jpg

They seem to be working pretty well on some cars... Yeah it isn't a skyline or a rb20/5/6 BUT they've been proven to support a bucket load of power and able to run some pretty decent numbers.

Id still never ever EVER use one on my engine.

Edited by LTHLRB

What GTSTboy, Kinks and others who agreed with them said is all plausible, but again so are the arguments which disagree. To say that Nissan designed something for a reason and thats that is nonesene as far as I am concerned. The last RB25 was built what, almost 2 decades ago now and the requirements and market undoubtedly changed by now. Almost every part on a nissan is replacable with aftermarket parts these days and some can simply be modified as is the case here.

The bottom line is this, unless someone has proven results on a dyno accross the rev range, no argument on here is substantiated. This is a really good discussion and if anyone has something else to add.........C'MON DOWN!!!!

the people that design this stuff know what they're doing, the stock manifold still works well at over double it's original power, and is debatable whether even the performance designs work better, but it's all good anyone can hack it up and improve it?

it seems that the people against it only have proof in what has been seen in the past so have no interest in experimenting with it

so far the argument for it is it's going to be boosting hard so doesn't matter?

i'm surprised there's even people still talking about wanting to do it, refer the pros & cons list earlier in the thread

2 mates cars run a cut and shut one has 300kw other has 360kw both running for 2-3 years tuner noticed decreance in intake temps but no leaning on cylinders.

I have one I am about to throw on mine as in a 180sx the crossover section hits the bonnet etc

did he have 6 wideband 02, one on each of exhaust ports? If not how can you tell if one cylinder is running leaner than the other

did he have 6 wideband 02, one on each of exhaust ports? If not how can you tell if one cylinder is running leaner than the other

Individual temperature probes on each exhaust runner (off the head).

Hotter is leaner. Simple as that.

i'm surprised there's even people still talking about wanting to do it, refer the pros & cons list earlier in the thread

That's the problem with ignorance. Some people just keep re-stating the same point of view until people with actual knowledge get frustrated at the lack of rational discussion, throw their hands in the air and give up.

Then the ignoramus thinks they've "won" and continues to spout rubbish ad nauseum.

This thread will continue until all the people with technical knowledge have given up and all we have left is "my cousin's left handed inbred sister's boyfriend's VL commodore made 400hp with a cut and shut plenum so it must be OK".

Whatever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Does that German restaurant still exist in the old place out the NW end of Goulburn? When I say "out the NW end of"...I am really being vague. It was 1997 when I was last there, and the only point of reference I can recall is that it was on the opposite side of the main drag from the big merino. And when I say "opposite side of the main drag", I don't mean "on the main drag". It was either a couple of streets back from there, or might have even been out in the sticks a bit further. Was an old farm building or mill or somesuch. And when I say "the big merino" I might actually be thinking of a completely different part of town, because I just looked on maps and the big bugger is not where I remembered him to be! The food was good, consisting largely of various German mystery-meat sausage/loaf things and kartofflen.
    • So while the second sentence is completely correct and the whole point of the conversation, the first sentence bears consideration. If this bloke is just hoping to throw big turbos on and drive it around, because there are no helpful facilities at all in his tropical paradise** then he likely has zero chance of even knowing what the TP is on the last column in the stock maps, let alone know whether the ECU is operating anywhere near it or past it. So the point is very very moot. And, per what I said before, at stock boost on those turbos, you may well be off the end of the map. **I'm just back from Vanuatu, so I know exactly what small Pacific nations can be like wrt paradise without requisite facilities. But it's not even that simple. I put a high flow on my car and had to drive it around with a proper tune because of the lack of opportunity*** to put the bigger AFM and injectors into it to allow it to be tuned. I had to turn the boost down to less than I had before, and back off the boost controller's ramp, because it was exploring parts of the map that it didn't drive in before, and really couldn't access for tuning on the dyno either, and so was pinging. It was still well within the last column, because when I first**** set up the Nistune on the Neo I rescaled all axes of the maps to give some more space to explore. ***Family dyno was broken ****This was 13 years ago, and the TIM thing wasn't a thing then and so TP would definitely grow when pushing past the stock tune's limits.
    • Yep, this bit another local owner. I caught it before putting the transmission back into the car, what I noticed was the pressure plate fingers weren't flat and even. It's more obvious with the pull style clutch because the throwout bearing ring was visibly not flat once everything is put together. Nismo should really update their instructions to call out this specific detail. I'm not even sure the clutch as-shipped orients everything properly.
    • It ended up being that orientation of the float hub in relation to the clutch disk, when I installed it, I heard a loud click and being stupid, I decided to not take it a part and check it. The hub didn't properly align with the clutch disk and was causing the issue. Definitely an odd one! Dahtone Racing was able to fix me right up, stand up blokes!      
    • Right, but I'm saying on the stock ECU measured airmass from the MAF is no higher than stock. So it's accounting for the higher flow rate iso-manifold pressure. You just have to keep turning down the boost until you're within the stock tune's load scale. If you run off the end there's no telling what will happen. This does mean there's zero benefit to the turbos you're running vs stock, if anything it's just a straight downgrade because the transient response is worse, you don't even get the ECU's boost solenoid helping to pull the wastegate closed during initial spool, and peak power is only whatever the factory map can give you before you hit the R&R corner. On a -9 I would bet that you would have to change out the wastegate spring once you have a real ECU and you're tuning it for real. I'm not saying this is a remotely ideal state of affairs, it's just a way to keep it driveable until you can get a proper tune done.
×
×
  • Create New...