Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have just completed upgrading the stock wastegate actuator to a Turbosmart universal actuator with 14psi springs and thought it would be nice to let you guys know how I did it. Some modifications to the new actuator are required as our actuators are not in a straight line to the gate due to space restrictions.

post-29959-0-45793900-1379252063_thumb.jpg

First up remove the stock actuator. Some of its parts are required for the new actuator to work: actuator rod/shaft and the mounting bracket.

Next, dismantle the stock actuator: cut the ribs (careful of the loaded spring!), undo the rod/shaft retaining nut and remove the rod/shaft. Now cut the housing off the bracket to retain the bracket.

post-29959-0-43823700-1379252099_thumb.jpg

Now, dismantle the Turbosmart actuator and remove its straight rod/shaft. To do this you must clamp the housing, otherwise you will never undo the retaining nut.

post-29959-0-08775300-1379252161_thumb.jpg

The stock rod/shaft needs to be shortened 5mm on the actuator end and a new thread needs to be cut in to fix it to the new piston. I actually cut a larger than required thread on the shaft and tapped a matching thread into the new piston.

post-29959-0-09167900-1379252197_thumb.jpg

Now holes need to be drilled in the bracket so the actuator can bolt up to it with the shaft hole in the bracket lining up with the actuators shaft hole. A couple of coats of paint before it is attached to the new housing would be good.

post-29959-0-60629600-1379252258_thumb.jpg

Next, the stock shaft gets installed with the new gromet, spring base plate and springs. Now here is the tricky bit... Apply Loctite to the threads of the shaft and piston. Use a clamp or something similar to pull the piston to the shaft thread under the springs compression and when they meet, rotate the piston to wind up the shaft thread. I compressed the springs as much as required so that I could tighten the shaft as much as possible. Now remove the clamp and align the shaft as in the pic. The final alignment is to be where the blue marks on the bracket are, but only move that once you have the body assembled.

post-29959-0-30256800-1379252290_thumb.jpg

Fit the diaphram and top housing over the piston and begin to maneuver it into position before reapplying the clamp with the retaining nut looped over the clamp, ready to screw onto its thread.

post-29959-0-40532000-1379252333_thumb.jpg

This step requires a bit of maneuvering, but the easiest method I found was to drill out some holes in a piece of ply and use that on the back of the actuator to get the clamp in the right position to close the housings properly. These need to be closed completely to get the retaining nut on completely.

I already had this on mine, but you will also need a female threaded eyelet for the other end of the shaft so that the correct pre-load can be applied to the gate.

And voila, a much better wastegate which will wont leach out precious boost too early based on a 8psi spring (stock spring rate)

post-29959-0-23865000-1379252382_thumb.jpgpost-29959-0-67553300-1379252436_thumb.jpg

Or you can simply weld a spring to the side of the stock actuator like I do, much cheaper and easier to swap springs.

I do like you ingenuity, but getting to the actuator is a pita from the front.

I wish you hadn't ruined the factory actuator for a simple shaft Adam, I would have bought it off you as they are rare items. (mine keep going missing)

If anyone else is planning to do this, perhaps make a new shaft for it, and better would be to use a dual port actuator if possible. That way you can use boost pressure to hold the actuator closed also.

  • Like 1

I wish you hadn't ruined the factory actuator for a simple shaft Adam, I would have bought it off you as they are rare items. (mine keep going missing)

 

If anyone else is planning to do this, perhaps make a new shaft for it, and better would be to use a dual port actuator if possible. That way you can use boost pressure to hold the actuator closed also.

If anyone else was planning it just a idea but you could try using a straight shaft with a adjustable plate to get the clearance on the housings?

Or you can simply weld a spring to the side of the stock actuator like I do, much cheaper and easier to swap springs.

I do like you ingenuity, but getting to the actuator is a pita from the front.

Hey dude,

do you mind explaining what you mean??? I like the idea of being able to swap springs!

I have made around 20 modified actuators for M35's, welding springs to the side that pull back on the same angle as the stock spring. They hold around 17psi, depending on the setup, and work quite well.

  • Like 1

I have made around 20 modified actuators for M35's, welding springs to the side that pull back on the same angle as the stock spring. They hold around 17psi, depending on the setup, and work quite well.

And you do them cheap :)

The shaft can not be straight. If you were to make up a different bracket to move it past the turbo, then you would have to cut a large chunk out of the wheel well.

I initially bent up the shaft which came with the new actuator, however it ended up 10mm too short. I guess it would be possible to get a female to female connection to extend it though, then the stock actuator could be saved.

Before all of this I did attach a helper spring on the outside, however, I was unaware of the spring rate and after reading on other forums that they tend to break after some time, I wanted to reduce the amount of reasons why I would need to get to the turbo again. I am not all all saying that Scotty's mod is no good, but simply that I didn't believe I had it right and the desire for something more permanent.

Whichever way anyone decides to go, it is recommended to upgrade/modify the actuator, as 8psi is a little low for what most of us want out of our cars.

I haven't had a spring fail in over 5 years, that's a pretty good run. I can't see a 3mm piece of spring steel snapping in a hurry without outside forces these don't get, and it's easily replaceable anyway at little cost.

The Turbosmart actuator looks good, although I would rather the kinugawa one with dual ports if it fits, as it is half the price. They also come with various bent/straight shafts to custom make it to suit. I am looking into this at the moment as it has been too long without a bolton actuator upgrade for us.

I reckon you did a good job and it's good to see something different

Scotty would be cool to see something easy and off the shelf

What about modifying a evo x turbosmart actuator they have a band and are 233mm long... Maybe cut the straight and shorten it to suit?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...