Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok I have been asking for advice on my build and as we speak. I have got the following parts.

1. Set of rods and pistons. Manley rods with 625 bolts, cp pistons with 9310 pins.

2. Tomie over size oil pump

3. ACL race bearings.

4. ARP head studs and main studs.

5. Cometic 1.3mm thick head gasket

6. 1.1 head oil restrictor

7. Supertech intake and exhaust valve seals.

8. Head oil drain kit.

9. New OEM cam and rear oil seals.

Im waiting on a new oem crank with the long oil pump drive and a new cylinder head. With some valve and spring. Then I can start the build.

I have a few queation regarding a set of new hks cams and for my goal of 600 hp should I use them. I plan on drag racing the car more than driving ir on the streets. I have a stock r33 gtr for street use.

The cams specs are stock lift but 272 duration. I dont have much experience with cames as I always go stock cams on my builds. The biggest difference going from a gtst to a gtr is that I just launch the hell out the gtr rpms are in the 8000 area all the time. Will these cams help me or slow me down for my 600hp goal.

My next problem is. I know of the rb oil issues and have never had real big oil pump failures in the past. Thats on rb25 builds. Now with this new oil pump. (Tomie) should I go with the ovwrsize oil pan or is it a waist of money?? I see that Raw Brakerage has a service to inlarge my pan for 1100 usd. They also put the head return on the pan but on the intake side. Is this a good idea.

Edited by MJTru
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/434325-what-cams-to-go-with-on-rb26-build/
Share on other sites

I am definatly no expert on this topic but I would have thought your valve train would be the most limiting factor on deciding what cams you go, not power. I personally would go high lift high duration because an increase throughout the entire powerband would be advantageous. But I assume you are worried about valve float because of the high rpm launches?

I didnt choose these cams they came with the motor from japan. Valve float did cross my mind. The turbo is a PT 6262.

I personally was planning on selling them and going for stock ones, cams that is. I got the set of valve springs for stock lift. I was told that I can increase the lift a little. But will be fine use the hks cams. Yes I was told by the old owner of the car that the cams are stock lift and 272 duration. These numbers didnt come from me but the person who got them. In my head thats risky.

Im already turned off. So I guess ill just get a set of stock cams.

I can remember reading an old thread where people made better power using there oem cams over several brands out there. It had mentioned that if the whole valve train wasnt looked at it may be better to go back to the stock cams.

Any ideas on the oil pan.

Any ideas on the oil pan.

Read the oil control thread or if you don't want to read all of it just the first few and last 10 pages say.

The Tomei pump should not fail but it can empty your sump. The restrictor will help. The head "drain" will not but if you are going to fit it the exhaust side is preferred. The enlarged sump is also good insurance against engine failure...although the price looks high - are there alternatives? I would recommend drilling and tapping two holes as high as possible in the inlet side which you can plug if you are not going to run breathers. That way if you do decide you need breathers later you won't have to pull the engine and remove the sump.

I have done a lot of reading in those threads but thats about a year ago. I decided to go with the head drain as insurance. I understand by putting the restictor in the head will reduce the amount of oil in the head and really make the head drain redundant.

I was looking over the oil pumps manual and it does say that I need a enlarged oil pan.

Does anyone know of another option thats cheaper that 1100 usd offered by raw brokerage. It looks to be a very clean unit with extended oil pick up and oil pan baffles.

As for the cam. Yes sir. Its intended for drag racing. I will attach the supertech part number for the valve springs.

With such duration I will need stiffer springs to avoid floating valve effect right. This is the reason I want to post the part number I got.

I have heard that this duration will kill low end power but make up for it on the top end.

Can you please explain just a little about the subject. Like pros and cons.

Edited by MJTru

I have done a lot of reading in those threads but thats about a year ago. I decided to go with the head drain as insurance. I understand by putting the restictor in the head will reduce the amount of oil in the head and really make the head drain redundant.

I was looking over the oil pumps manual and it does say that I need a enlarged oil pan.

Does anyone know of another option thats cheaper that 1100 usd offered by raw brokerage. It looks to be a very clean unit with extended oil pick up and oil pan baffles.

As for the cam. Yes sir. Its intended for drag racing. I will attach the supertech part number for the valve springs.

With such duration I will need stiffer springs to avoid floating valve effect right. This is the reason I want to post the part number I got.

I have heard that this duration will kill low end power but make up for it on the top end.

Can you please explain just a little about the subject. Like pros and cons.

I was pretty sure tomei/hks/nismo did sump baffles, but nothing is going to be as reliable as an extended sump, especially at the high rpm for drag racing. I would do it just for the reliability of the engine.

I think by low end they mean 1-3k. Which for a drag car you will use 0% of the time. I believe the reason the low end suffers is because before the turbo begins to spool you are essentially trying to suck air in, and with a huge duration, it becomes null and void, but as soon as the boost kicks and it starts to push all the air in, the duration and lift begins to shine because you are able to force so much more air in, in comparison.

I am not sure about the figures, but I believe stock is 9.15 lift, 264 duration?, hks step2 is 10.15, 272 duration? That is hell of a lot more air. I was reading the rb26dett tuning page and it said someone got a 60hp increase just from cams and adjustable cam gears.

Obviously if money wasn't an issue, vct would make up for the loss of power low end...?

Supertech SPRK-M1007S/RB

Specs:

Outer Spring O.D.: 28.10mm

Outer Spring I.D.: 20.00mm

Seat: 70 @ 40.7 (lbs@mm)

Open (lift): 188 @ 11 (lbs@mm)

Max net lift: 16.00mm

Coil bind: 24.70mm

Rate: 10.50 lbs/mm

Does anyone know of another option thats cheaper that 1100 usd offered by raw brokerage. It looks to be a very clean unit with extended oil pick up and oil pan baffles.

These are popular here but freight might kill it for you:

http://www.trademe.co.nz/motors/car-parts-accessories/nissan/engines/auction-654508309.htm

Piggaz is right those are the stock cam specs.

But can anyone answer my question as to the supertch sping specs will work or not. Eather hks steps in sure of the duration, but ill mesure the lift today and tell you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day  
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
    • Are you 100% sure this isn't tune related?
    • 140-150 across the board. At this point hoping the grounding harness fixes it. My grounds are all tied to the chassis and none to the battery. For SR and KA that’s never been a problem for me but had a few other guys here and Reddit who told me RB really like a very solid ground setup tied to the battery so going to try that next, I’m stumped if that doesn’t do it. Never had a car have spark and fuel and not fire off before. Only thing I can think is the spark is intermittent/weak because of grounds nothing else really makes sense at this point 
    • I am having close to the same issue. Can you help me with what wire you grounded to get your pump to trigger?
×
×
  • Create New...