Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I actually think the Mines cams would work well as an 'off the shelf'... I think they are around 250° duration and over 10mm lift; might be stock base circle too which would save you some more hassle, can anyone confirm?

You need to choose a cam then select a suitable spring, talk to someone from Ferrea they are a top quality product in terms of head components.

Kelford do there own springs . If its to dear to get a custom grind then that might be an option .

Probably the same reason he had 272 with 8 something lift

Well the reason for the 6:1 is because when my 26/30 was first built by white brothers racing there was not much to choose from and had to use rb30 dishtop pistons. Brad from spool imports only uses camtech cams. He has built more motors then everyone together on sau. He now builds stroked 30/26 motors and selling them back to the japs. He has tried all different setups and knows what works best. So if you have never heard of people using camtech cams maybe you should do some research and not be so naive. Brad from spool is a good mate of mine and has advised me on everything with my new build and for someone that builds and sells well over 500 motors a yr with good comment about his motors world wide. I know who I would listen to. Not some half wit on a fourm

  • Like 2

He hand builds 500 motors a year, really in 365 days, well I'll tell you what, I don't build motors for a living or work on cars for a living for that matter, its a hobby for me and I have done all the setup and building of both my cars

My R32 GTR with stock turbos and most every thing else except for a few select parts I chose myself makes 293rwkw and has run 11.1@123mph, how does your mates motors go

My R34 GTR I designed and built from the ground up myself with the factory look being the only restrictor made 623hp at all 4 and still have to do cams and hope weather dependent will run it tomorrow night

Don't be mistaking tool, I'm not some dyno show car whore and a pretty peaky graph doesn't excite me, my cars are built to go fast

One thing I have learnt over the years is just because you do it for a living doesn't mean your any good and personally I wouldn't touch a spool engine, maybe that's why he sends them overseas, cause I'm not alone

  • Like 1
I didn't get opinions from a bunch or forum members (the majority have no idea), I went out did some research, bought some books and talked to the right people. You need to do the same and come to your own decision.

Ok I spoke to kelford and I think they are the people in the know and who I can trust as rob from rips uses them for all his builds they know what they are talkinh avout and are not just trying to sell me a set of cams or do a ported head for me just to make the money they advise all the customers what to use and how to go about things

Kelford dont just make the ports bigger in fact they they take out the minimum to make sure they get not only air flow numbers at the right points but also work to very strict port velocity as to not upset low down power making, that is except for the monsters that need to make power at high revs

Kelford make cars go fast for a living and are very good at it look at robs cars he has built are they slow ?????? I know who I would trust with knowledge !

182 -s kelford cams I am going with 10.8 lift

  • Like 1
It sounds like you have it all sorted then, Rob is very good at what he does so no doubt it will give a good result which I'd dear say you'll post up when done yeah ?

Yes I will definitely post up results unknown when car will be running maybbe 3-4 months

He hand builds 500 motors a year, really in 365 days, well I'll tell you what, I don't build motors for a living or work on cars for a living for that matter, its a hobby for me and I have done all the setup and building of both my cars

My R32 GTR with stock turbos and most every thing else except for a few select parts I chose myself makes 293rwkw and has run 11.1@123mph, how does your mates motors go

My R34 GTR I designed and built from the ground up myself with the factory look being the only restrictor made 623hp at all 4 and still have to do cams and hope weather dependent will run it tomorrow night

Don't be mistaking tool, I'm not some dyno show car whore and a pretty peaky graph doesn't excite me, my cars are built to go fast

One thing I have learnt over the years is just because you do it for a living doesn't mean your any good and personally I wouldn't touch a spool engine, maybe that's why he sends them overseas, cause I'm not alone

Look bud first thing is how stupid you just made your self sound. Your car originally came from os. And I really dont think the japs would be buying his stroked motor if they were no good like you make out. Especially with the technology they have. So in other words if the japs are shit and only buy shit why do you drive a jap car... lol

2nd thing. Yes my car was a show car before I owned it making 450hp. I use it as a day to day driver and used a spool race prep head and made 550hp with the 6:1 comp. Now the new spool motor is over 1000hp and used day to day. Aint no show car.

3rd thing if your gtrs are half as good and fast as you make out. Why not bring it up to the winter nats here at qld and put it beside spools street trim gtr and sort it out on the track. Of course you will say you would win so there for there aint no reason why you shouldn't unless your scared and cant back the shit you dribble

Each to there own. I have been bitten my many different shops/builder and tuners and brad from spool is one of the olny that is true to his word and wont sell something to make a buck. Check his site out and judge for your self.

It sounds like you have it all sorted then, Rob is very good at what he does so no doubt it will give a good result which I'd dear say you'll post up when done yeah ?

You can lead a horse to water... etc.

You can lead a horse to water... etc.

I know right, what's getting me is he came in here asked us out opinions and then when we give then to best of the knowledge we have learnt over the years which is mostly spot on and its not what he wanted to hear he gets defensive and slaps us in the face by telling us cause we don't do it for living we must have no idea and does what he was going to in the first place, so why on earth ask a question you don't want the answer to

What worse is he will make good power then go around misleading everyone by telling everyone its cause of the 272 duration without realising the whole time it was the 10.8mm lift, I just hope one day he gets to try the same car setup the same way with the only change being the cams back to the 260s with the same lift we advised him to get in the first place so he can learn what we already have

A smart man learns from his experiences, a smarter man learns from other people's

182-S sounds about there....270-274 10.5 lift....noted its good on E85 if you want to boost it.....

http://www.camshaftshop.com/products.php?productid=41337

If you have a laggy turbo and want quicker spool 182-C, 272, 10mm lift.

http://www.camshaftshop.com/products.php?productid=1021#specs

The website has all the info.

Id be leaning towards the S if racing and C if needing more street drivability.

Ok I spoke to kelford and I think they are the people in the know and who I can trust as rob from rips uses them for all his builds they know what they are talkinh avout and are not just trying to sell me a set of cams or do a ported head for me just to make the money they advise all the customers what to use and how to go about things

Kelford dont just make the ports bigger in fact they they take out the minimum to make sure they get not only air flow numbers at the right points but also work to very strict port velocity as to not upset low down power making, that is except for the monsters that need to make power at high revs

Kelford make cars go fast for a living and are very good at it look at robs cars he has built are they slow ?????? I know who I would trust with knowledge !

182 -s kelford cams I am going with 10.8 lift

Ive been sitting back, not posting and having a chuckle while this thread has progressed....

Good that you spoke to some experts with real world experience, its always best to listen those that have done this before and got the results you were looking for.

Yes porting is about the flow, bigger is not always better.

As i said, your in good hands, im surprised you didnt just ask the right people in the first place.

Looking forward to hearing your results when its ready, dont forget to post them. :)

Ive been sitting back, not posting and having a chuckle while this thread has progressed....

Good that you spoke to some experts with real world experience, its always best to listen those that have done this before and got the results you were looking for.

Yes porting is about the flow, bigger is not always better.

As i said, your in good hands, im surprised you didnt just ask the right people in the first place.

Looking forward to hearing your results when its ready, dont forget to post them. :)

Thankyou yes kelford have had a lot of exp and rob uses them that speaks for itself I will post results when running

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...

I know right, what's getting me is he came in here asked us out opinions and then when we give then to best of the knowledge we have learnt over the years which is mostly spot on and its not what he wanted to hear he gets defensive and slaps us in the face by telling us cause we don't do it for living we must have no idea and does what he was going to in the first place, so why on earth ask a question you don't want the answer to

What worse is he will make good power then go around misleading everyone by telling everyone its cause of the 272 duration without realising the whole time it was the 10.8mm lift, I just hope one day he gets to try the same car setup the same way with the only change being the cams back to the 260s with the same lift we advised him to get in the first place so he can learn what we already have

A smart man learns from his experiences, a smarter man learns from other people's

Came on the site to get some help, listened to a lot of blokes and followed advice from people that have been doing a lot of their own work and checked their results. I am doing a RB30/3.2L Nitto stroker and taking their advice and going with the EU, 260 10.8 cams , so I guess I will find out how good the advice was :yes:

Has Daniel finished the build yet, love to see the results :yes:

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...