Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just watching a James Allen interview with Webber...lol "advice for Daniel..." "Marks response "Kick his ass. I took him to the last race in 2010, he has to do one better " :) Flaming Champion. Cant wait to see him at Le Mans next year

Also funny to see Alonso saying "we will see Mark next year supporting us.." and laughing at the suggestion he will be rooting for Alonso and not RBR. Cant help but suspect there could be some truth to the statement

Marussia could merge with Sauber leaving just ten teams on the 2014 Formula One grid, claims a report in the German media.


According to Auto Moto und Sport, Marussia - like many of their rivals - are struggling and face a budget of "76 million euros."


The team's Russian owners are keen to merge with another team and, having failed in a bid to do so with Williams, have targeted Sauber.


Journalist Michael Schmidt claims that "chief Andrei Cheglakov is reportedly fed up with needing to dig deep into his own pockets only to be down the field but he still wants to remain in Formula 1.


"He tried to buy Mercedes motorsport boss Toto Wolff's shares at Williams, that's around 15 percent.


"Bernie Ecclestone is said to have endorsed the deal but Claire Williams rejected it as Williams want to remain independent."


The report continued claiming that Marussia have now set their sights on "joining forces" with Sauber, who are "looking for new sponsors and partners on the Russian market."



http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/9048222/-Marussia-chasing-Sauber-merge-



two less pay drivers on track.


This ^^ is what is wrong with F1. Other than the few front running teams no one is getting anywhere near enough funding to run. Sponsorship is almost non existant - take a look at the teams:
McLaren - some Mexican randomness for next year and little in the way of mid level sponsors. I would imagine they ran at a big loss this year and will be even worse next year.

Williams - Basically nothing.

Lotus - Only secondary sponsorship and how many tens of millions of losses this year?

Sauber - Again basically nothing other than what the pay drivers bring. Borderline going bust.

Force it India - Sponsors are the owners companies.

Red Bull - see above other than the Nissan money.

Ferrari - Dirty cigarette money still despite them signing agreements to do otherwise.

Marussia - enough said.

Caterham - The have GE but not sure what that is worth. Must be losing bags of cash too.

TR - shows how much coin Red Bull have to piss away.

MB - Petronas and Blackberry. Cant imagine Blackberry are long for this world. As one of two car companies with teams I dont imagine they care how much they lose. Make it up by selling sht cars with truck motors to people with too much money.

Anyway point is that the distribution of prize and tv money is so unbalanced it means teams down the blunt end have basically no chance of dragging their way out of it. All because the F1 bergers are hell bent on shoving cash Ferraris way. The whole system is nuts and reinforces boring, predictable races and results.

  • Like 1

Well he's already sold his house and lives at the factory so guess that's about as committed as one can get.

It always makes me smile when I think about how Ron Dennis started out as a mechanic at Williams.

There can really be no argument over who was the more shrewd entrepreneur in F1...

It always makes me smile when I think about how Ron Dennis started out as a mechanic at Williams.

There can really be no argument over who was the more shrewd entrepreneur in F1...

Yeah cause Frank Williams has had no success and no hurdles to overcome in his lifetime.

why's someone always gotta be contrary?

The facts- McLaren (with all it's various business activities) is now a company of far greater value under Ron's stewardship than Williams ended up being.

That's the sum total of the point I was making, sport. No need to get butt-hurt.

why's someone always gotta be contrary?

The facts- McLaren (with all it's various business activities) is now a company of far greater value under Ron's stewardship than Williams ended up being.

That's the sum total of the point I was making, sport. No need to get butt-hurt.

Well there is because running an F1 team over near on 40 years is a massive achievement. There are only a handful that ever survived for so long. Lotus didnt. Brabham, March, BRM, Ligier etc etc etc all went tits up. So the comparison is unfortunate because both Dennis and Williams have achieved massive success.

Also, a large part of the reason Honda left Williams in the mid eighties is because they didnt believe a paraplegic could run a company. Allegedly. They left to go to McLaren, by the way.

And Williams do ok on the other business activities front. Their hybrid power goes ok.

Anyway McLaren is heading downhill - I reckon 2014 will be worse than 2013. Podiums will be but a distant memory. As will sponsorship. And quick drivers. None of which is welcome. For either team.

No denying Williams F1 have had massive success, but the glory days must be a distant speck in the rear-view mirror by now. Which is a shame because I've always said I'd be Williams fan if not McLaren

Not that they've had too much to cheer about with regards to things F1 related in recent times apart from Lewis in 2008

No denying Williams F1 have had massive success, but the glory days must be a distant speck in the rear-view mirror by now. Which is a shame because I've always said I'd be Williams fan if not McLaren

Not that they've had too much to cheer about with regards to things F1 related in recent times apart from Lewis in 2008

You can be both, you know. Just as long as your hating on the team cheater Abu Dhabi is all.

Gunna get worse before it gets better for McLaren too. Hope the Honda is strong for 2015.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...