Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hei guys

Realized my stagea's speedo is reading wrong but some margin. Its showing more than im actually traveling, know that traffic is usually slower than the speed limit and even when i was driving 10 over there would still be cars passing by so I took this GPS unit to check it as they are supposed to be accurate and speedo is actually showing more than gps unit. Its like 10 over at 60 and almost 20 over at 100. When speedo is showing 120 GPS says im traveling at some 100-103 kmh...

So was wondering has anyone had similar problem or is this not that common, what causes it and yeah most important how to fix it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437745-calibrating-speedo/
Share on other sites

I don't have stock wheels and tyres, but they are about the standard diameter and my speedo was also reading about 10% over.

I put on of these in the car (tapped in near the dash): http://www.jaycar.com.au/productView.asp?ID=KC5435

BTW ADRs specify a speedo must be between 0 and 10% over actual speed....how crap is that?!?

M35's are notorious for the speedo reading high, I run 235/45/18's and they still read 10k's over at 100. I hoped the Nismo cluster would be more accurate, but it wasn't.

The ecu is reading the correct speed according to my informeter, but the speedo is still out, so I just use the informeter for accurate speed measuring.

I don't have stock wheels and tyres, but they are about the standard diameter and my speedo was also reading about 10% over.

I put on of these in the car (tapped in near the dash): http://www.jaycar.com.au/productView.asp?ID=KC5435

BTW ADRs specify a speedo must be between 0 and 10% over actual speed....how crap is that?!?

Hey Duncan, was it difficult to splice in & get accurate?

My speedo is approximately 10% out as well, which is a PITA for me, with 110kph limited factory cruise control :(

My ARX runs 225/55/18 as per the placard and when the spedo is at 110 the car is actually doing 103 (per my GPS)

The V36 is out by about the same. I reckon they are built like this to slow people down.

Now I figure if i run 245 45 18 as suggested above, this will reduce my rolling diameter from 2214mm down to 2129mm and throw the spedo out by another 4 kms/hour.

I figure that if I were to run 235 55 18 then at 110 on the spedo the car would be going around 105 kms an hour.

Found some Dunlop SP Sport 235/55/18 100V LM703 for a reasonable price. Anybody running these?

245 55 18 would produce about 107 kmh at 110, an error of only 3kmh but this tyre size is likely an off road tyre and if it didn't touch my plastic guards would sound like a truck anyway!

My ARX runs 225/55/18 as per the placard and when the spedo is at 110 the car is actually doing 103 (per my GPS)

The V36 is out by about the same. I reckon they are built like this to slow people down.

Now I figure if i run 245 45 18 as suggested above, this will reduce my rolling diameter from 2214mm down to 2129mm and throw the spedo out by another 4 kms/hour.

I figure that if I were to run 235 55 18 then at 110 on the spedo the car would be going around 105 kms an hour.

Found some Dunlop SP Sport 235/55/18 100V LM703 for a reasonable price. Anybody running these?

245 55 18 would produce about 107 kmh at 110, an error of only 3kmh but this tyre size is likely an off road tyre and if it didn't touch my plastic guards would sound like a truck anyway!

You're right Chris, the tyre set up I have suggested won't solve the issue on an AR-X, as they run a larger rolling dia than the RS/RX/AXIS. Do they use a different Speedo cluster?

Using a tyre size guide, should allow you to plug in easily available tyre dimensions, and reduce the error.

Blek it was pretty straightforward to install, the wiring is actually marked on the rear of the cluster so I just intercepted the signal on the way into the dash. AFAIK in most of these cars the signal goes from gearbox to dash and then everywhere else (eg ECU and cruise control) so the dash is a good place to intercept.

The only thing to be aware of is that the link I posted is a kit, so you will need a soldering iron and some patience to put it together.

I'd normally prefer to just change tyre size (am doing that in the leaf ATM to fix the same issue) but that's expensive if you aren't already due for new tyres anyway.

You're right Chris, the tyre set up I have suggested won't solve the issue on an AR-X, as they run a larger rolling dia than the RS/RX/AXIS. Do they use a different Speedo cluster?

Using a tyre size guide, should allow you to plug in easily available tyre dimensions, and reduce the error.

I have a feeling that the cluster may be different.

when I've seen Nismo clusters on Yahoo, if I remember correctly, they state NOT ARX.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
×
×
  • Create New...