Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Quick question, currently running 225/45/18 front and 245/40/18 rears.

Will changing to a 235/40 rear tyre upset the ABS or traction control at all? I'm not too fussed about the TC, as thats off when I drive it.

From online guides, the rolling diameter is as follows

225/45 is 659mm

245/40 is 653mm

235/40 is 645mm

Is this going to pose much of a problem? 235/40 wide tyres are so much cheaper and easier to come by than than 245/40. Rims are 18x10

Chris

As long as you're not talking about running different sizes front to rear (or, shudder, side to side) then neither system will know what you've done. It will be fine. Even with different sizes front to rear in those choices of size above, you should be 100% fine.

Yeah I'm not concerned about overall tyre size, just running a different size front to back in terms of overall diameter and if it will play up with the ABS etc

As I said, it's unlikely that the ABS or TCS will care about such a small speed difference. Those systems are not as picky as the ATTESSA is. The ABS is really only looking for sudden changes in speed on a given wheel - faster changes than are happening on other wheels. TCS is pretty much looking for the same thing in reverse. You wouldn't be the first to run tyres of that size difference on one of those cars.

I have the original wheels on my R34 GTR , I look at this beautiful mean looking machine and it looks empy down there and was wondering what size wheel/types will the R34 take without body mods.

my 350GT has 245/35z x r19" on the front and 275/30z x r19 on the back and it looks balanced, if you know what I mean?

I know MANY purests will not agree, but if we were all the same it would be a boring world.

I have the original wheels on my R34 GTR , I look at this beautiful mean looking machine and it looks empy down there and was wondering what size wheel/types will the R34 take without body mods.

my 350GT has 245/35z x r19" on the front and 275/30z x r19 on the back and it looks balanced, if you know what I mean?

I know MANY purests will not agree, but if we were all the same it would be a boring world.

I run a 18x 10.5 wide wheel with +15 offset on my 34 R. tyres are 265x35. Standard height, no rubbing whatsoever and fill the guards enough (could even go a +12 offset with ease). Next time will get a 275x35 tyre for a slightly fatter look.

I have the original wheels on my R34 GTR , I look at this beautiful mean looking machine and it looks empy down there and was wondering what size wheel/types will the R34 take without body mods.

my 350GT has 245/35z x r19" on the front and 275/30z x r19 on the back and it looks balanced, if you know what I mean?

I know MANY purests will not agree, but if we were all the same it would be a boring world.

Geezus. It's not as though there were already dozens of threads asking the same question.

Also, it's not as if you have an AWD system on board on the GTR that will crack the shits at you if you have different rolling diameters front to rear. Don't let common sense get in the way of your fashion decisions though.

/ferfuxake

Sorry to ask a question, I did look and could not see the same type of post, you are a sweetheart. :yucky:

You should get a life, after 4.25k posts you are too sensitive and a smart A, do not read new members posts and give them a chance to learn or were you born with all of this knowledge, you must have a massive head to house your brain, shame it is in your pants.

If this is how you blokes help on this site, stick it!

If you cannot help, PO :action-smiley-069:

I mean no disrespect to members on this site, in a short time posting you blokes have been great and I am learning something new each day, it is just as easy to be nice as it is to be agro.

if members do not like the question because the person could not find answers I would suggest that you do not reply to the post and we will get the message, we do not need to be verbally bitch slapped :spank:

I run 265/35's front and rear. No issues at all.

Can you fit this on a R33 gtst? Have you had any body work done? Whats your offset? I wanted to run this size but was told the biggest I could fit was 255s, which is what I have in there now, but its an unusual size and harder to find tyres.

Can you fit this on a R33 gtst? Have you had any body work done? Whats your offset? I wanted to run this size but was told the biggest I could fit was 255s, which is what I have in there now, but its an unusual size and harder to find tyres.

I run R34 GTR rims (18x9 +30). No inner plastic guards at the front & guards have been rolled at all 4 corners.

My R33 used to have 235/35R19's at front (with some scrub on full lock) & 275/30R19's at the back. No issues at all. Cant remember the offset of the rims (they were a strong positive offset though)

Hope that helps in some way...

I run R34 GTR rims (18x9 +30). No inner plastic guards at the front & guards have been rolled at all 4 corners.

My R33 used to have 235/35R19's at front (with some scrub on full lock) & 275/30R19's at the back. No issues at all. Cant remember the offset of the rims (they were a strong positive offset though)

Hope that helps in some way...

Thanks. Yea my guards are rolled now. But 255s 19 35 fit without problems on mine, even before the guard rolls, why did you choose to go 235 on the front? How did 235s on the front and 275s on the rear change the balance of the car? R33s are already understeery enough, did it cause it to under-steer even more?

Now that I got my guards rolled, my aim is to fit 265s on the front and 285s on the rear. Wondering how feasible that is.

Though I will probably needs some chassis reinforcement. I already have a front strut brace but its not enough. The 20yr chassis is not fearing too well and it bends and rolls all over the place. I fitted a rear strut bar, but all that did is decrease rear grip and increase oversteer which I hate so I took it out. I told my mechanic to tighten all the chassis and suspension bolts but I think he "tightened the f**k" out of them and now steering wheel is really heavy and fights you going around corners like it just wants to straighten up. Silly move as now I think they all need to be re-torqued, and no one work shop knows the torque specs, at least not without charging half the cost of the car to do it.

Edited by sonicz

Then you didn't look very hard, princess.

I have had a look at some of your Forum imputs and you seem very knowledgeable, I know nothing and willing to say so, you should use your powers for good not evil.

I have tried to search info out and cannot find what I am looking for or get no reply so I will ask you.

Before I bought this car there had been a lot of $s spent on the motor and a new Nismo 2-way LSD and I wonder why they put a Greddy T78 single Turbo system on it instead of using the standard twin system that came with the car or to a better TT system.

They are now putting a Tomei pon drop in camshaft and a HKS 5 duel solinoid boost controller and will be on the Dyno later this week and then I will know what they will tune it to.

You do not list what car you have at the moment?

Princess :kiss:

Young people of today are unable to work anything out for themselves it appears.

Big single = better than big twins. Now that you have been told the situation, why don't you go and read around for yourself to find out why?

Hey I am 71, you must be older going on the gruppy metre :rant: , this is all new to me ,I tried to find out and got conflicting oppinions depending on what they wanted from their car.

I have read this,there are different set ups for twins, Parrallel, Sequential and the Series type. A lot seem to like the series type but they can be a bit tricky at times, if the second turbo spools in power especially in a corner when not expected it can be :w00t:

Then a big single supplies air to all cylinders and more efficient , I guess depending on the quality gives you your desired results. That is iff you have the room for a big single.

You say Big Single=better , tell me your thinking why they are better and were the singles are better instead of sending me off to read the same info again :unsure:

I am here to learn from you blokes :worship:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...