Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so my car has adjustable every thing. It's just been in and had a wheel alignment drives ok but handling is a problem. What I want to no is how low can a r33 Gtr be before it changes it's handling and will the lower control arm spacers help or what do I need to do to make it a good car again. I have read lot of info on here and can't make heads or tales of it the theory of suspension is out of my league, I really just need to be told what will work if possible I would like it lower than factory

Some help would be great

Lower control arms want to be horizontal the the worst. Preferably not sloping upwards from the inner pivots out to the ball joint. Preferably sloping down a tiny bit from the inners out to the balljoints.

As such the lowest height (as measured from the centre of the wheel cap to the underside of the guard lip) is about 350-355mm at the front, 340-345mm at the rear. And no lower. This is around 40mm lower than factory (generally, it varies a bit from car to car).

Probably 8kg/6kg f/r

Get the castor increased to +5 or more, gives good steering feel. Front upper arm bushes will get flogged hard (Nismo mounts helps apparently).

Wind some negative camber in there, -1° rear, -2° front. It'll chew the tyres but you'll turn like a machine.

What tyres do you have? Also, they aren't sway bars (they don't cause your car to sway), they're anti-roll bars (increase roll stiffness, reduces body roll) ;):P.

Get sway bars (Are you positively annoyed friend? nismo_man?) - they're usually the best place to start, in particular getting a stiffer rear bar will reduce the understeer. You can get adjustable bars - i have whitelines on mine with the front full soft and the rear full hard. Still understeers, but its a lot better.

Depending on what springs he actually has, he might be better off pissing them all off in favour of a set of 5kg/mm* springs at each end. After all, the stock springs on a GTR are much firmer at the rear (relative to the front ones) than on RWD Skylines.

Just as an example of a spring rate that is quite a bit firmer than stock but not as ridiculous as the typical 8/6 shenanigans on cheapy coilovers.

The tyres on there are just cheap ones i have some new rims coming I'll get some good ones for them lift it up a little get a wheel alignment done with the specs you have put up and give that a try thanks for you help guys should I get better anti roll bars for it ?

245 17 tyres. That's about as useful as "rubber tyres"!

There are tyres, and then there are tyres. Manufacturer? Model? Profile? Pressure?

And which model Blitz coilover? Are they height adjustable? If so, you will have to have the car corner weighted if you want the best outcome.

This what I'm told works to reduce understeer (or increase oversteer):

- increase front tyre pressure (higher than rear)

- reduce rear tyre pressure

- softer front spring

- stiffer rear spring

- softer front roll bar

- stiffer rear roll bar

- higher front tyre profile

- lower rear tyre profile

- increase -ve camber on front

- reduce -ve camber on rear

I would look at replacing the tyres first. Think Hankook R-S3 if it's not a daily. Tyres are the only thing connecting you to the ground, so they have a big impact on handling.

Actually, that's not really true. Tyres do obviously have a direct effect on grip and therefore roadholding behaviour, but you really have to differentiate between raw grip and the balance of grip at each end and the way that changes under the effect of the various car controls.

"Handling" really does mean how the car handles - ie, how it responds to the controls (the hand). If you have some poorish tyres on with low grip levels and the car is a committed understeerer, then putting sticky tyres on will still leave it a committed understeerer, it's just that the tendency to wander off into the weeds won't become apparent until higher speeds. So you can mask poor handling with better tyres to some extent, but you can't realy change the handling. Well, you could....you could put different tyres on at each end. I've actually run a car that way deliberately for a while because I couldn't afford to fix its real problems.

I would actually have a car with low grip tyres and good handling balance than something with really sticky tyres and a severe problem in the handling.

If you have some poorish tyres on with low grip levels and the car is a committed understeerer, then putting sticky tyres on will still leave it a committed understeerer, it's just that the tendency to wander off into the weeds won't become apparent until higher speeds. So you can mask poor handling with better tyres to some extent

That's what I was aiming at. Take a corner @ 60 km/h on shit tyres = poor handling. Take the same corner at the same speed on stickier tyres = better handling. But you still need to look at the other aspects.

On the flip side, you can have an awesome suspension etc. and have crap tyres, and still get poor grip. But it depends on what you want from your car though (seeing it's a GT-R, I would say, the higher the grip level, the better).

To me, it sounds like the OP's suspension is too stiff and low, with standard-style wheel alignment settings/stuffed up alignment.

What wheels do you run Luke?

That's what I was aiming at. Take a corner @ 60 km/h on shit tyres = poor handling. Take the same corner at the same speed on stickier tyres = better handling. But you still need to look at the other aspects.

I disagree. Both your cases are poor handling. One has better roadholding, but they both have the same lack of handling balance. Handling <> roadholding. Different concepts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...