Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so my car has adjustable every thing. It's just been in and had a wheel alignment drives ok but handling is a problem. What I want to no is how low can a r33 Gtr be before it changes it's handling and will the lower control arm spacers help or what do I need to do to make it a good car again. I have read lot of info on here and can't make heads or tales of it the theory of suspension is out of my league, I really just need to be told what will work if possible I would like it lower than factory

Some help would be great

Lower control arms want to be horizontal the the worst. Preferably not sloping upwards from the inner pivots out to the ball joint. Preferably sloping down a tiny bit from the inners out to the balljoints.

As such the lowest height (as measured from the centre of the wheel cap to the underside of the guard lip) is about 350-355mm at the front, 340-345mm at the rear. And no lower. This is around 40mm lower than factory (generally, it varies a bit from car to car).

Probably 8kg/6kg f/r

Get the castor increased to +5 or more, gives good steering feel. Front upper arm bushes will get flogged hard (Nismo mounts helps apparently).

Wind some negative camber in there, -1° rear, -2° front. It'll chew the tyres but you'll turn like a machine.

What tyres do you have? Also, they aren't sway bars (they don't cause your car to sway), they're anti-roll bars (increase roll stiffness, reduces body roll) ;):P.

Get sway bars (Are you positively annoyed friend? nismo_man?) - they're usually the best place to start, in particular getting a stiffer rear bar will reduce the understeer. You can get adjustable bars - i have whitelines on mine with the front full soft and the rear full hard. Still understeers, but its a lot better.

Depending on what springs he actually has, he might be better off pissing them all off in favour of a set of 5kg/mm* springs at each end. After all, the stock springs on a GTR are much firmer at the rear (relative to the front ones) than on RWD Skylines.

Just as an example of a spring rate that is quite a bit firmer than stock but not as ridiculous as the typical 8/6 shenanigans on cheapy coilovers.

The tyres on there are just cheap ones i have some new rims coming I'll get some good ones for them lift it up a little get a wheel alignment done with the specs you have put up and give that a try thanks for you help guys should I get better anti roll bars for it ?

245 17 tyres. That's about as useful as "rubber tyres"!

There are tyres, and then there are tyres. Manufacturer? Model? Profile? Pressure?

And which model Blitz coilover? Are they height adjustable? If so, you will have to have the car corner weighted if you want the best outcome.

This what I'm told works to reduce understeer (or increase oversteer):

- increase front tyre pressure (higher than rear)

- reduce rear tyre pressure

- softer front spring

- stiffer rear spring

- softer front roll bar

- stiffer rear roll bar

- higher front tyre profile

- lower rear tyre profile

- increase -ve camber on front

- reduce -ve camber on rear

I would look at replacing the tyres first. Think Hankook R-S3 if it's not a daily. Tyres are the only thing connecting you to the ground, so they have a big impact on handling.

Actually, that's not really true. Tyres do obviously have a direct effect on grip and therefore roadholding behaviour, but you really have to differentiate between raw grip and the balance of grip at each end and the way that changes under the effect of the various car controls.

"Handling" really does mean how the car handles - ie, how it responds to the controls (the hand). If you have some poorish tyres on with low grip levels and the car is a committed understeerer, then putting sticky tyres on will still leave it a committed understeerer, it's just that the tendency to wander off into the weeds won't become apparent until higher speeds. So you can mask poor handling with better tyres to some extent, but you can't realy change the handling. Well, you could....you could put different tyres on at each end. I've actually run a car that way deliberately for a while because I couldn't afford to fix its real problems.

I would actually have a car with low grip tyres and good handling balance than something with really sticky tyres and a severe problem in the handling.

If you have some poorish tyres on with low grip levels and the car is a committed understeerer, then putting sticky tyres on will still leave it a committed understeerer, it's just that the tendency to wander off into the weeds won't become apparent until higher speeds. So you can mask poor handling with better tyres to some extent

That's what I was aiming at. Take a corner @ 60 km/h on shit tyres = poor handling. Take the same corner at the same speed on stickier tyres = better handling. But you still need to look at the other aspects.

On the flip side, you can have an awesome suspension etc. and have crap tyres, and still get poor grip. But it depends on what you want from your car though (seeing it's a GT-R, I would say, the higher the grip level, the better).

To me, it sounds like the OP's suspension is too stiff and low, with standard-style wheel alignment settings/stuffed up alignment.

What wheels do you run Luke?

That's what I was aiming at. Take a corner @ 60 km/h on shit tyres = poor handling. Take the same corner at the same speed on stickier tyres = better handling. But you still need to look at the other aspects.

I disagree. Both your cases are poor handling. One has better roadholding, but they both have the same lack of handling balance. Handling <> roadholding. Different concepts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...