Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently had to charge my flat battery ( not using car very much at the moment) and when I attached the neg lead back to the battery (with pos obviously already connected) I accidently (and clumsily) touched the ratchet used to tighten the nut between the neg and pos terminals of the battery resulting in big spark and me jumping quite high.

The car has been used since then and everything seems normal, but my question is could there have been damage to the electrics and/or the battery?

Many thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/439770-accidentally-shorted-battery/
Share on other sites

And the ratchet would glow bright yellow and then melt before the battery went flat anyway. And in the meantime, the only effect at the ECU would have been removal of power.

The real problem you have heard about (although obviously not correctly) is reverse polarity connection. Hook up a jumper battery or car backwards and see what happens to the ECU (which may be nothing, depending on how good the RP protection is).

Edited by GTSBoy

Realistically, the welding thing is perfectly true. Or at least it used to be. And it isn't the battery terminals you need to remove. The ECU needed to be unplugged from the loom to prevent it from getting nasty zaps up through the earth connections.

More modern cars and ECUs have much better protection against this sort of thing so you can get away with it. But back when all this was new, many ECUs and other vehicle electronics were damaged by welding.

Well it shorted through my ratchet, so it should be fine, only thing would be the ECU that would be damaged if left on long enough and I would have known by now if it was wrecked. Are there any other components besides the ECU that can be damaged?

Think about it, Your shorting a battery accross the terminals. Basically you are bypassing everything between the positive and negative circuit in the battery. The only damage will be to your ratchet.

Unplugging sensitive electrics when welding is a good practice to do, in theory if you have the earth lead close to where you are welding (and provided it isnt near an ECU etc) then the chances of damaging it are minimised Because the circuit wants to take the shortest route to the earth lead. So if the earth lead is at the back of the car and you are welding on the front reo bar, you can imagine that the circuit is much more likely to join with the ECU circuit then if you have the Earth lead closer to the welding area. Having said that, I would never weld on a car without unplugging ECU's etc because its alot of current to pass through the chassis

Shorting across the battery terminals is not much different to shorting from the positive to the chassis (because the Battery negative goes to a nearby Chassis earth anyway)

The most likely thing you will damage is the battery. This is a bit more of an issue if the battery is in the boot, has been through some charging cycles and there is hydrogen gas around. Arcing the terminals can result in battery explosion. I've seen plenty of horrible photos of people messing with batteries in dump trucks/dozers where this has happened and the battery is a mangled wreck.

Summary:

Shorting battery terminals, not advisable but generally doesnt end in disaster

Welding with ECU's plugged in: No

Edited by 89CAL

Remember that some ECU's require a 5V power source for sensors and dont generally like higher voltages then that.

OHMS law proves that voltage is proportional to current. Voltage goes up, current goes up

Edited by 89CAL

Welding........much more than 12v.

And much more current then you will find in your fuse box in your car :)

Some people are lucky and get away with welding with everything still connected, but for the small amount of effort it takes to unplug stuff, its not worth the risk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • http://calfinn.com.au/product/1500kg-standard-trolley-jack-cj-2t-c/1500kg-standard-trolley-jack-cj-2t-c   I have this and fits under a S3 33 GTR with no issues. Purchased in 2009 and not one issue. It was $950 back then. Not cheap but something so important isn’t worth cheaping out on.
    • Just trying to get my head around this. At 5psi of boost, you turn on your wmi pump, and then you're using a 3000cc injector, to allow flow upto the actual engine, where you have your 6x200cc injectors and a 500cc injector. If the above is correct, what advantage are you obtaining by having the 3000cc injector blocking flow, is this just incase a line breaks between that injector and the motor you can stop flow immediately? Or are the 6x200cc and 500cc less injectors and just spray nozzle?
    • Welcome! New member myself, but I had an R33 back in 2002. Best advice I could give, based on my experience: if you're running the factory turbo, be very conservative with boost. I made the mistake of just fiddling around with the boost controller and cranking the boost for fun, and the end result was my intake pipes popping off frequently from the constant deluge of oil that was being blown into the recirc by the stressed-out turbo, which itself was siphoning oil from the engine and farting it out both sides of its centre bearing (or something to that effect). If I could do it all again, I would have gotten a new turbo and had a tune dialled in professionally and then just left it alone! Funny you mention the metal shavings in the gearbox, as I had the same thing - the probe plug (magnetic drain plug, essentially) would come out caked with shavings. At least it was doing its job. Not sure if that's just sacrificial wear and part of the deal, or if my gearbox was shagged, but I wasn't abusing it. Enjoy the R33 - they're a dying breed, and if they weren't $35k+ on CarSales in Queensland, I might have picked up one of those again, instead of the 370GT I own now (though I'm loving the 370GT, that big 3.7L V6 just hits different).
    • Howdy folks. I owned an R33 back in 2002, which was thoroughly beyond my capacity (financially speaking) to maintain/insure, so we parted ways in 2004. Fast forward 21 years (to literally yesterday, in fact) and I'm now the proud owner of a 2007 V36 370GT. I'm happily surprised by how much power the VQ37VHR makes, compared to the RB25DET, considering the latter is turbocharged. I had planned to add a turbo at some point but I'm on the fence about whether I'll even need it (though I do love the sudden onset of extra torque). Any other 370GT owners around the traps, I'd love to hear about your experiences with this car (good and bad).
    • Perhaps the answer is... more jacks!* *proper jacks must be used.  
×
×
  • Create New...