Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My tuner here in canada managed to tune a rb28 with gt860-5 with stock cam I believe and it made 640whp on a dynapack.

I can say I have all the supportive bolt-on mods you could get + haltech ecu + aquamist kit. running 3 inch exhaust.

Do you think/ have anyone made the test on a dyno I would be gaining something ''worth the hassle'' of an exhaust cutout on my RS*R front pipe ?

If we're talking 10whp, with no extra torque or more responsive engine, I think we can say its not worth to hack a RS*R pipe + the cost of labour and cutout. However, if I can make the engine more responsive, add 15 lbs of torque .. then it could be interesting.

Your though ?

Can you elaborate on what you mean by cut out?

640whp is mega. I believe Piggaz is the only one in Aus running just shy of that with -5s on an RB28.

General rule of thumb is that if you drop your exhaust before the cat and gain lots of power you have a restriction in your exhaust. Otherwise you should realistically be looking at 10-20whp tops.. And a 3" system should support close to the asking price.

3 inch?

Throw that in the bin and put something decent on there.

How much boost and what fuel are you running to achieve those figures?

I'm running a twin 3 inch system on my car.

As a comparison, GT RS's at 2 bar made 414 rwkw using a kakimoto full mega N1 (rubbish catback which was 80mm into a 90mm into some peanut rear muffler which at best would have been 2.75 inch inside). Going back to -5's, from pods to stock airbox and the much bigger exhaust netted 426 rwkw at 23 psi, cam gears and the rear of the setup remained unchanged. Same car, same tuner, same fuel, same dyno. At that power level there is much to be gained.

Dynapack is a hub dyno where Paulie is on a chassis dyno so I think Paul is still ahead, just

3" exhaust IMO is to small for that power range and I'm sure you would pick up a fair bit with a 3.5", but as already mentioned drop the cat and run again and see if there is a restriction in the rest of the exhaust

heres the cutout I'm looking for and will be installed before the cat :



I wanted to drop the catback and see by myself.. but the tuner said he's not a fan of messing up with the car while the car is on the dyno.. so if I have to pay 300$ just to see if theres a gain, I might as well pay 300$ to buy the cutout and have it installed lol.

3 inch?

Throw that in the bin and put something decent on there.

How much boost and what fuel are you running to achieve those figures?

I'm running a twin 3 inch system on my car.

As a comparison, GT RS's at 2 bar made 414 rwkw using a kakimoto full mega N1 (rubbish catback which was 80mm into a 90mm into some peanut rear muffler which at best would have been 2.75 inch inside). Going back to -5's, from pods to stock airbox and the much bigger exhaust netted 426 rwkw at 23 psi, cam gears and the rear of the setup remained unchanged. Same car, same tuner, same fuel, same dyno. At that power level there is much to be gained.

right now tuned for 23psi with 94 octane (us fuel) I'm running r34 dump ( 58mm) to a RS*R 70x2 to 1x80mm all the way to the end (no cat). Already bought myself a set of 70mm dump pipe, would just need to install a cutout right after the merge to unleash more flow. ( I have no choice to run max. 3 inch exhaust if I dont want more cop attention than my skyline already draw lol)

Edited by cobrAA

That cut out is dodgy as hell and if you put that in your front pipe here it would be an instant $10,000 EPA fine

Not to mention it would drop back pressure from your engine leaning your motor out, do it properly and up grade the exhaust with the dump pipes you already have then a matching front pipe with a 3.5" outlet and the 3.5" cat back

3.5" exhausts can be made very quite with good quality mufflers, I had a custom twin 3" into single 4" made for my car and it is quieter then the 80mm jap spec that can off it

Why can you not run a bigger exhaust? Is it the noise or just the size of the pipe that attracts attention? Going to 3.5in from 3in will allow roughly 35% more flow.

Both! but even if your car is quiet.. a big pipe will still draw useless attention.

That cut out is dodgy as hell and if you put that in your front pipe here it would be an instant $10,000 EPA fine

Not to mention it would drop back pressure from your engine leaning your motor out, do it properly and up grade the exhaust with the dump pipes you already have then a matching front pipe with a 3.5" outlet and the 3.5" cat back

3.5" exhausts can be made very quite with good quality mufflers, I had a custom twin 3" into single 4" made for my car and it is quieter then the 80mm jap spec that can off it

Well, i tried and couldn't find any quiet resonator in 3.5 inch. So I decided to go the cutout route, but since you mentionned that 10k fine, I can see now why in Aus, guys dont put cutout. we don't have this fine over here.

it all depends on the turbo and what its capable of...wont get much if you have a 3 inch turbo outlet flange and go 4 inch in exhaust. Gotta increase flow from the source then work your way down.

Sort of.

It will surely sound very angry, but I would only activate it on a drag strip or on a highway if I meet with a modded supra hahaha. I'm just scared that I will gain little with this mods. Like, how many have been able to break the 600whp marks on a dynapack with a pair of -5s ( on a rb26) ? Not to mention when I did 576whp, I still had stock intercooler, no water-meth and nistune maf ecu.

Edited by cobrAA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...