Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep they are 3" through on the later BF Turbos and people say their std exhaust is god for around 320 Kw . The twin pipes and mufflers looks like an interesting idea too .

Not conformed yet by my exhaust may be a HKS Drager with oval mufflers mid and rear , will confirm later . Anyone else have this kind of thing with the two internal pipes in the rear oval ?

A .

At the likely power ceiling of this turbo you won't have any appreciable gains by taking the system to 3.5 inch.

Identifiable downsides - and I have the experience here - include:

packaging difficulties. Physical room available means it is just harder (not impossible) to get the bends to flow nicely and maintain clearance to mechanical bits. Also depending on your ride height (affected by wheel/tyre packaging and any suspension mods) you may have ground clearance issues if running a second muffler between the cat and rear suspension cradle

silencing difficulties. because of the issues with making bigger bends fit, you are robbed of some length from the muffler. So you end up with a shorter muffler with less packing. Also the sheer internal volume of the pipe work IMO means pressure waves are belting down the pipe with less interference and able to make their way out the tailpipe with less noise suppressed than a 3".

cost. Price up the relative differences between bend sections in 3 vs 3.5 inch. It is significant when building a system.

weight.

I have no doubt it is possible to get a good streetable result with 3.5 inch, but it would take some work and yours might be a guinea pig. My 3.5 system has a very loud idle but in every other respect comparable to the previous 3" for the ability to suppress drone at motorway cruise, and high rpm noise. I just don't feel that the airflow required for 300ish kW necessitates the bigger pipework.

I'd suggest drop the existing system off, consider sticking in a quality aftermarket cat as others have successfully used, and physically inspect your mid and back muffler to ensure neither has been sneakily necked back to 2.5".

  • Like 1

I have been using a 3" system the whole way through my build and it is dead quiet! With the GT and the HTA it still works fine!

But half of it is flying out of the vent to atmo gate?

I caught up with the exhaust people late this afternoon and there opinions are .

Existing cat is RS and needs to be replaced by something better , they like 100 cel metal core ones .

They asked the power goal and say 300 tread wasps is around the 3-3.5" cusp . 3 quieter but 300+ grey area . They use 3.5 on XR6s which is logical on a 4L IMO .

Dale my exhaust already has two oval mufflers and clearance isn't an issue . I roll on 245 45 17s and no it's not low for a Skyline .

Anyway the plan is to get it on the hoist and have a good look at what's there . The cats going and I finally found someone who agrees that those spring loaded "cup joints" are a good idea and keeps them in stock . The rally people who used to do my exhaust work said big exhausts act as great engine steady bars meaning they transmit a lot of noise and vibration into the system and often they ring like a bloody bell . Naturally this is transmitted into the cabin space pissing the ocupants off no end .

If this cup joint can go behind the gearbox hanger it will unload the exhaust and very likely give the manifold studs an easier time . The plan is to have 3.5" to the cat and probably taper down to 3 behind it for for the mid and rear mufflers . The rear to have as much can area as possible .

Anyway joint and cat first and suss out the rest .

A .

What brand 3" exhaust is it matt?

Apexi... Super Megaphone II from memory...

But half of it is flying out of the vent to atmo gate?

Mebe :ph34r:

But even plumbed back it hauls ass! Hard to know if there is any difference due to traction issues i guess....

Apexi... Super Megaphone II from memory...

I had one of these...

It was f**king amazing... I'd never heard an SR like that...

I took it off the car to trial a straight pipe and see if there were any gains... Left the Supermegaphone at my dads... Came back a few weeks later and he had taken an angle grinder to it because it was 'taking too much space'.

And that was the day I lost my shit.

However, a few weeks later I wen't back to visit again and found it on the back of HIS car................................ NOTHING SUS. Photo attached.

post-43588-0-89317000-1394576690_thumb.jpg

TL:DR Apexi Super megaphone exhausts are amazeballs, even on a 70s Porsche.

Edited by GTScotT
  • Like 2

I had one of these...

It was f**king amazing... I'd never heard an SR like that...

I took it off the car to trial a straight pipe and see if there were any gains... Left the Supermegaphone at my dads... Came back a few weeks later and he had taken an angle grinder to it because it was 'taking too much space'.

And that was the day I lost my shit.

However, a few weeks later I wen't back to visit again and found it on the back of HIS car................................ NOTHING SUS. Photo attached.

attachicon.gif774839_10151233635634211_1320273578_o.jpg

TL:DR Apexi Super megaphone exhausts are amazeballs, even on a 70s Porsche.

Was yours super quiet? Even with all the mods it still remains silent and i love it :yes:

Can drive around town and nobody would know it was modified... Until i get in a carpark and the diff starts :laugh:

Was yours super quiet? Even with all the mods it still remains silent and i love it :yes:

Can drive around town and nobody would know it was modified... Until i get in a carpark and the diff starts :laugh:

Truth be told it made lots of noise... But it was a very different noise to what you would expect... Had zero drone and was very breathy. No real 'bass' to its tone, and certainly wasn't a tractor in any way.

It was fairly silent. f**king old wog father and his angle grinder -_-

Truth be told it made lots of noise... But it was a very different noise to what you would expect... Had zero drone and was very breathy. No real 'bass' to its tone, and certainly wasn't a tractor in any way.

It was fairly silent. f**king old wog father and his angle grinder -_-

Yeah the RB sounds very different compared to others i have heard!

Lolz @ old wog!

I don't think there is a difference between 2.5ltr and 4.0ltr. it is about air. Remember the engine is an air pump, and a 4ltr making 270kws vs a 2.5ltr making 270kws flows similar air. It's called boost. Going back a while I was spending an hour a day looking at every exhaust shop from around the world and discovered at 270kws that was when you could or should step up to 3.5" but only if you were pretty sure you were going to make more power. So if 300kws is what your looking at then maybe 3.5 is where it's at.

Mostly the dump of course but having felt the heat coming out the back of my exhaust on the dyno I have always thought the theory of cooling gases from engine to tailpipe just a little flawed. Ok, so the tailpipe isn't glowing red, but it's still bloody hot. And hot gases are expanded gases. So for fu*# sake will somebody do a back to back 3" vs 3.5" ? Don't change anything else, just the exhaust.

Gary I think the cooling theory holds water but possibly more of an NA than forced principle . The exhaust people I speak to say that from dyno experience 3.5 is where it's at power wise approaching 300 RWKW . This is not to say that 300+ can't be done with 3" though no two built exhausts will be exactly the same .

I have to compromise because my 33 is a daily and loud exhausts isn't an option . I have considered and did ask about staying 3.5 through the cat and first muffler and stepping down for the rear one , half way and easy to change if that was quiet . Realistically 3" after the cat is probably acceptable 90% of the time for a car that isn't raced on or off public roads .

Interested in other opinions , cheers A .

Gary I think the cooling theory holds water but possibly more of an NA than forced principle . The exhaust people I speak to say that from dyno experience 3.5 is where it's at power wise approaching 300 RWKW . This is not to say that 300+ can't be done with 3" though no two built exhausts will be exactly the same .

I have to compromise because my 33 is a daily and loud exhausts isn't an option . I have considered and did ask about staying 3.5 through the cat and first muffler and stepping down for the rear one , half way and easy to change if that was quiet . Realistically 3" after the cat is probably acceptable 90% of the time for a car that isn't raced on or off public roads .

Interested in other opinions , cheers A .

Kurtis made the same sort of power as me on a 3" with his gate plumbed back... It can be done so just do it lol

I think this is the first thread ever where we have contested the size requirement of 300kw... It has ALWAYS been 3" so I am not sure why it has suddenly changed.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...