Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Had a new exhaust fitted today. Full 3" turbo back. Anyway on the way home the CEL came on.

Just wondering if anyone else has had this prob after fitting there exhausts?

I do have a scan tool here but the bloody thing won't link. I'm thinking it has to be the 02 sensor.

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/441036-cel-on-after-new-exhaust-fitted/
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

Had a new exhaust fitted today. Full 3" turbo back. Anyway on the way home the CEL came on.

Just wondering if anyone else has had this prob after fitting there exhausts?

I do have a scan tool here but the bloody thing won't link. I'm thinking it has to be the 02 sensor.

Thanks.

Could be the warning light for the cat converter - shouldn't be too hard to fix.

You got an AXIS yeah?

Don't think our cars would throw a CEL from the O2 due to cats since the only O2 is upstream of them. Maybe it wasn't screwed in tight enough and it's getting bad readings or maybe it was unplugged or wire got damaged during the install. Did you fit it yourself?

I've seen loose ones on other cars cause engine lights so I'd try check that or visual check the wiring to it.

There is no cat warning light. Good chance it is the ecu going into lean limp mode. The ecu should have been reset after such a serious mod, now it needs to be reset so it learns the new fuel requirements.

You can't just use an obd2 reader, none of them connect. Our car isn't obd2 compliant.

Possibly P0420 code. Not unusual for picky ECUs with aftermarket exhausts.

As Scotty mentioned, ECU reset and see if that helps. If it pops up again, throw a can of upper head cleaner through it, that has fixed a few P0420s for my clients.

Worst case, rip the cat off and clean it properly.

Absolute worst case, move the cat/O2 sensors to near factory positions.

Hope it helps.

Mark :)

Dave, yeah axis. And I was thinking same thing... 02 is up stream so cat wouldnt effect that.

I had it made and fitted by Windsor exhaust shop. They are local with a good rep.

First thing I checked was 02 plug, and checked it was tight. Double check wiring tomorrow.

Scotty, sucks they are not obd2 compatable. What tool do I need to scan it?

How do I do a ecu reset? Is it as simple as the skylines and just disconnect the battery?

Thanks for your input guys.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/index.php?/topic/261557-Ecu-Fault-Codes---The-Easy-Way%21

I've never posted a link to another topic so not sure that will work but the ecu reset is detailed here, if my link doesn't work try search function

Could you access the actual O2 bung on the new exhaust to check sensor tightness? My stock one is pretty much impossible to get to without a crows foot spanner bit or without dropping the gearbox crossmember all way down till you can fit a spanner up there. It's probably not an issue but maybe last resort check

Ecu reset sounds like best idea, go from there I reckon.

Dave, yes I used a crows foot to make sure it was tight.

I looked at your link. fault code is 0135 which I believe is 02 sensor. but I could not get the procedure to clear the code to work.

surely the procedure is just to give you the code and clear it...not to actually reset the ecu to learn the new fuel requirements??? correct me if im wrong.

I use a (knock off) Consult3 to diagnose, it's the only way to read all ecu's. There are other options, like the Osirus cable, but they only talk to the engine afaik. I have used a Snapon scan tool with some success, but it needs to have the Japanese software loaded. You can reset the ecu to some extent using the manual method, but I can't guarantee it will reset the long term fuel trims. Disconnecting the battery won't help.

I hope they didn't damage the sensor, it's quite tight up there... Perhaps try a new one if the code returns?

Yeah you'd need a scan tool to reset engine adaptions. If you clear the code maybe the ecu will correct itself before it stores again anyway.

I've never heard of anyone having this problem on an m35.

I wanted to buy yours Scotty but buy the time I.got the dump and front pipe from you, then a cat back from import monster or the likes, the price was getting up there and then I still would of had to install myself.

Just made more sense to get it all from the same place.

It's not on a bend. It's on the straight section between the bend just before the cat and just after first bend from turbo.

Went back to the exhaust shop today, let them know I wasn't happy and made it clear that its there responsibility to fix it. He said 02 sensor was very rusty and hard to get out so they may have damaged it then.

End of the day they are going to take care of it. I'm dropping it back to them tomorrow.

Why isn't the o2 in the stock position just after the turbo? You can't just go around moving sensors and expect them to run as per factory. Narrowband sensors need to warm up as quickly as possible, directly in front of the turbine outlet flow is the correct spot.

Where did they mount the cat, in the dump pipe?

Possibly. It's up to you to fault find this one, as I doubt the exhaust shop will help much. It's taken me 5 years to perfect my Stagea dump and front pipe, there is a lot more to exhaust design than just making a pipe from here to there...

What did they use for a turbo flange? I assume they re-used the stock one, as laser cutting a new flange one off is cost prohibitive. So it's a mild system?

It's mild pipe with stainless mufflers. I'll take some pics tomorrow when its on the hoist.

Not sure about the flange i will check whilst on the hoist.

And if they don't help! I will demand they put my stock exhaust back on and give me a full refund.

Try get them to swap the sensor and if that doesn't fix it, it'll probably have to be welded back in stock location. What else could it be? Unless you've developed a mixture changing fault that's unrelated to your new exhaust at the exact same time as getting your new exhaust.

Sensors are pretty simple but better to stick to stock locations. Maybe the flow and pressure in the pipe has changed too much to give it good readings where it's mounted now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...