Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Had a new exhaust fitted today. Full 3" turbo back. Anyway on the way home the CEL came on.

Just wondering if anyone else has had this prob after fitting there exhausts?

I do have a scan tool here but the bloody thing won't link. I'm thinking it has to be the 02 sensor.

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/441036-cel-on-after-new-exhaust-fitted/
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

Had a new exhaust fitted today. Full 3" turbo back. Anyway on the way home the CEL came on.

Just wondering if anyone else has had this prob after fitting there exhausts?

I do have a scan tool here but the bloody thing won't link. I'm thinking it has to be the 02 sensor.

Thanks.

Could be the warning light for the cat converter - shouldn't be too hard to fix.

You got an AXIS yeah?

Don't think our cars would throw a CEL from the O2 due to cats since the only O2 is upstream of them. Maybe it wasn't screwed in tight enough and it's getting bad readings or maybe it was unplugged or wire got damaged during the install. Did you fit it yourself?

I've seen loose ones on other cars cause engine lights so I'd try check that or visual check the wiring to it.

There is no cat warning light. Good chance it is the ecu going into lean limp mode. The ecu should have been reset after such a serious mod, now it needs to be reset so it learns the new fuel requirements.

You can't just use an obd2 reader, none of them connect. Our car isn't obd2 compliant.

Possibly P0420 code. Not unusual for picky ECUs with aftermarket exhausts.

As Scotty mentioned, ECU reset and see if that helps. If it pops up again, throw a can of upper head cleaner through it, that has fixed a few P0420s for my clients.

Worst case, rip the cat off and clean it properly.

Absolute worst case, move the cat/O2 sensors to near factory positions.

Hope it helps.

Mark :)

Dave, yeah axis. And I was thinking same thing... 02 is up stream so cat wouldnt effect that.

I had it made and fitted by Windsor exhaust shop. They are local with a good rep.

First thing I checked was 02 plug, and checked it was tight. Double check wiring tomorrow.

Scotty, sucks they are not obd2 compatable. What tool do I need to scan it?

How do I do a ecu reset? Is it as simple as the skylines and just disconnect the battery?

Thanks for your input guys.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/index.php?/topic/261557-Ecu-Fault-Codes---The-Easy-Way%21

I've never posted a link to another topic so not sure that will work but the ecu reset is detailed here, if my link doesn't work try search function

Could you access the actual O2 bung on the new exhaust to check sensor tightness? My stock one is pretty much impossible to get to without a crows foot spanner bit or without dropping the gearbox crossmember all way down till you can fit a spanner up there. It's probably not an issue but maybe last resort check

Ecu reset sounds like best idea, go from there I reckon.

Dave, yes I used a crows foot to make sure it was tight.

I looked at your link. fault code is 0135 which I believe is 02 sensor. but I could not get the procedure to clear the code to work.

surely the procedure is just to give you the code and clear it...not to actually reset the ecu to learn the new fuel requirements??? correct me if im wrong.

I use a (knock off) Consult3 to diagnose, it's the only way to read all ecu's. There are other options, like the Osirus cable, but they only talk to the engine afaik. I have used a Snapon scan tool with some success, but it needs to have the Japanese software loaded. You can reset the ecu to some extent using the manual method, but I can't guarantee it will reset the long term fuel trims. Disconnecting the battery won't help.

I hope they didn't damage the sensor, it's quite tight up there... Perhaps try a new one if the code returns?

Yeah you'd need a scan tool to reset engine adaptions. If you clear the code maybe the ecu will correct itself before it stores again anyway.

I've never heard of anyone having this problem on an m35.

I wanted to buy yours Scotty but buy the time I.got the dump and front pipe from you, then a cat back from import monster or the likes, the price was getting up there and then I still would of had to install myself.

Just made more sense to get it all from the same place.

It's not on a bend. It's on the straight section between the bend just before the cat and just after first bend from turbo.

Went back to the exhaust shop today, let them know I wasn't happy and made it clear that its there responsibility to fix it. He said 02 sensor was very rusty and hard to get out so they may have damaged it then.

End of the day they are going to take care of it. I'm dropping it back to them tomorrow.

Why isn't the o2 in the stock position just after the turbo? You can't just go around moving sensors and expect them to run as per factory. Narrowband sensors need to warm up as quickly as possible, directly in front of the turbine outlet flow is the correct spot.

Where did they mount the cat, in the dump pipe?

Possibly. It's up to you to fault find this one, as I doubt the exhaust shop will help much. It's taken me 5 years to perfect my Stagea dump and front pipe, there is a lot more to exhaust design than just making a pipe from here to there...

What did they use for a turbo flange? I assume they re-used the stock one, as laser cutting a new flange one off is cost prohibitive. So it's a mild system?

It's mild pipe with stainless mufflers. I'll take some pics tomorrow when its on the hoist.

Not sure about the flange i will check whilst on the hoist.

And if they don't help! I will demand they put my stock exhaust back on and give me a full refund.

Try get them to swap the sensor and if that doesn't fix it, it'll probably have to be welded back in stock location. What else could it be? Unless you've developed a mixture changing fault that's unrelated to your new exhaust at the exact same time as getting your new exhaust.

Sensors are pretty simple but better to stick to stock locations. Maybe the flow and pressure in the pipe has changed too much to give it good readings where it's mounted now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...