Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am chasing low end torque in my R34GTR, so I am changing the T78(Dyno chart) for a PT6262 and adding poncams Bs on a strong motor.

I am booked in for the work next week and have asked for the car to be tuned for more low end torque. As you can see from the Dyno reading (as I was told) is bad and would be a bitch to drive, it is.

They said with the new turbo and cams they can tune it to the response I asked for and will be happy with the results.

Has anyone got a Dyno readout to show me what more Torque looks like on 338KW so I can compare it.

post-52098-0-06933700-1396423916_thumb.png

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/441405-changing-t78-to-pt6262-for-torque/
Share on other sites

Hi Peter,

I can't comment on the PT6262 as I have no experience with them however would suggest you match the turbocharger to your requirements (power v response). The T78 is far too big a turbocharger for the power you're making and there are far more responsive options that will yield better results.

If you would like options feel free to give me a call.

Regards,

Andrew Sullivan

Kudos Motorsports

(07) 5641 1171

Had a look at posts and it does help me understand it, my curve is very low and slow to rise , just like it is to drive, lots of gear changing and a pig to do step hill starts and goes hard after 5k. If I did not live in the bush I would hardly ever use the turbo.

Thanks everyone for that info and it helps me and it lets me see how laggy mine is.

When they are doing the work I will have them email me a reading, at least now I have some idea if it is going to be OK and I will post it before I go to Sydney to pick it up, hopefully you and others can comment if you think they have done a good job ?

My dyno torque reading just looks so dead compared to most of the others here with similar KW.

They said the motor mods etc will handle more power, maybe need more fuel but I have enough HP, I just want a fun street car not a laggy heap

Had a look at posts and it does help me understand it, my curve is very low and slow to rise , just like it is to drive, lots of gear changing and a pig to do step hill starts and goes hard after 5k. If I did not live in the bush I would hardly ever use the turbo.

Thanks everyone for that info and it helps me and it lets me see how laggy mine is.

When they are doing mine I will have them email me a reading, at least now I have some idea if it is going to be OK and I will post it before I go to Sydney to pick it up, hopefully you and others can comment if you think they have done a good job ?

My dyno torque reading just looks so dead compared to most of the others here with similar KW.

They said the motor mods etc will handle more power, maybe need more fuel but I have enough HP, I just want a fun street car not a laggy heap

Hi Peter,

I can't comment on the PT6262 as I have no experience with them however would suggest you match the turbocharger to your requirements (power v response). The T78 is far too big a turbocharger for the power you're making and there are far more responsive options that will yield better results.

If you would like options feel free to give me a call.

Regards,

Andrew Sullivan

Kudos Motorsports

(07) 5641 1171

Thanks Andrew but the car goes in on Monday for the mods

The car has had a lot done on the motor and was a work in progress, T78 was part of the build but the bloke ran out of money and sold it before he completed the build.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...