Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have a Au XR6 falcon ute and trying to figure out whats doing with it. Its using like 22L/100km and can actually see it puff out black smoke when free reving it.

It runs ok with an intermittent roughness like its trying to stall on me and a few times has cut out completely on me while driving, usually as I come to a stop at a traffic lights it will get rought and the revs come down to 400-500rpm. 90% of the time she'll run perfect though.

This weekend I removed the manifold and found the intake manifold flooded with what looks like fuel, so ive installed new injectors and tightened all intake manifold bolts and resealed the plenum. Took it for a drive and still doing the intermittent wanting to stall and coughing black smoke, no engine warning lights on and will idle perfect most of the time. so got me stumped.

Have read the falcon forums and I think people on here might have more knowledge.

Just looking for sensible idea's, suggestions and not smart ass comments. Apart from this issue its a good vehicle, dual fuel and just got a paint job.

post-70965-0-24759700-1398591205_thumb.jpg

Edited by AngryRB

I have a second shitbox falcon same model so I can try swapping sensors but a few mechanics said if theres no engine warning lights on then the sensors should be fine

would a blocked cat cause rich fuel mixture?

Edited by AngryRB

tomorrow Im gonna take it to exhaust shop and have the cat and front muffler replaced with a straight thru pipe, then replace the coolant temp sensor, 02 and map sensor with the other falcons that runs

perfect..

thanks for the help so far ..

Edited by AngryRB

Try an ecu reset. Disconnect the battery, hold your foot on the brake for 30 seconds, reconnect battery. If it's getting stuck on the cold map this should probably fix it. If not then hunt elsewhere.

The 4l doesn't have a maf. You've already replaced the inj so I'd check the reg. you're about 13l too rich, that's a lot for a few dud sensors.

this is correct, it has a map sensor which a vacuum leak will cause the car to run rich

It's a maP sensor not a maF sensor so it measures vacuum in the inlet manifold, the more you open the throttle (more load) the less vacuum is in the manifold.

So if you have a vacuum leak the maP sensor believes there is more load on the engine and injects more fuel

MAF= Mass Air Flow

MAP Manifold Absolute Pressure

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...