Jump to content
SAU Community

Cycle Registration Floated

GTR-N1

By GTR-N1,
in New South Wales

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 279
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

scotty nm35
scotty nm35

The speed difference is definitely not the issue, my motorised pushie does an easy 50-60kph and is a lot more dangerous on the road for many reasons, most being drivers just don't expect me to be trav

TREGTR
TREGTR

Too many bottles of grange in my cellar for that (metaphorically speaking) lol

PN-Mad
PN-Mad

I think both sides (talking globally here; not talking about people in this thread) have an arrogance that pisses each other off. Cyclists that flaunt themselves on the road, taking liberties just t

Posted Images

PN-Mad Grand Master

PN-Mad

Posted
Posted

I think both sides (talking globally here; not talking about people in this thread) have an arrogance that pisses each other off.

Cyclists that flaunt themselves on the road, taking liberties just to piss people off, and motorists that think the world revolves around them (ahem mums on the school run....) and nothing should ever get in their way.

Sounds to me like Daleo is a good example of a responsible cyclist, he isn't going to be the one taking up a whole lane on a single lane road, he'll wave you past when it's safe to do so. In turn, and in respect of that, I'd pass him giving him as much room as I safely can. That's all that needs to happen.

  • Like 2
luke gtr Grand Master

luke gtr

Posted
Posted

I think both sides (talking globally here; not talking about people in this thread) have an arrogance that pisses each other off.

Cyclists that flaunt themselves on the road, taking liberties just to piss people off, and motorists that think the world revolves around them (ahem mums on the school run....) and nothing should ever get in their way.

Sounds to me like Daleo is a good example of a responsible cyclist, he isn't going to be the one taking up a whole lane on a single lane road, he'll wave you past when it's safe to do so. In turn, and in respect of that, I'd pass him giving him as much room as I safely can. That's all that needs to happen.

this.

and when I ride, I keep to the opposite side, so I can see on coming traffic.

I ride on the road(when no brake down/bike lanes are available), and move onto the mud/grass/gravel when a car does approach.

I want to see them coming.

that way, I can react accordingly.

I also dont wear a helmet (lets not get into that debate atm), and have never been booked for not.

but...

if I do get booked, my reaction will be taking an entire lane the entire trip.

because, thats the law....

dont ride much anymore, so doubt it will ever happen.

aaand, go...

PN-Mad Grand Master

PN-Mad

Posted
Posted

this.

and when I ride, I keep to the opposite side, so I can see on coming traffic.

I ride on the road(when no brake down/bike lanes are available), and move onto the mud/grass/gravel when a car does approach.

I want to see them coming.

that way, I can react accordingly.

I also dont wear a helmet (lets not get into that debate atm), and have never been booked for not.

but...

if I do get booked, my reaction will be taking an entire lane the entire trip.

because, thats the law....

dont ride much anymore, so doubt it will ever happen.

aaand, go...

How is your crank bearing....?

Daleo Grand Master

Daleo

Posted
Posted

Here's an interesting article from the US about the "Idaho Stop".
http://www.vox.com/2014/5/9/5691098/why-cyclists-should-be-able-to-roll-through-stop-signs-and-ride

It proposes some constructive solutions for getting bicycles off high traffic thoroughfares, which would be a win for both sides of the argument.

Not trying to inflame the situation, but there is some useful info in there, and the rule (or a version of it under a different name) has been in use in states across the US with fewer negative outcomes than the status quo.

PN-Mad Grand Master

PN-Mad

Posted
Posted

Here's an interesting article from the US about the "Idaho Stop".

http://www.vox.com/2014/5/9/5691098/why-cyclists-should-be-able-to-roll-through-stop-signs-and-ride

It proposes some constructive solutions for getting bicycles off high traffic thoroughfares, which would be a win for both sides of the argument.

Not trying to inflame the situation, but there is some useful info in there, and the rule (or a version of it under a different name) has been in use in states across the US with fewer negative outcomes than the status quo.

Yeah, apparently cars are exempt from the laws of physics. Spot that line in there?

Frankly, I didn't think it was a very well written article, and it didn't sway my opinion that it is safer to have enforced stop and red lights.

If governments were serious about reducing carbon emissions, they wouldn't be installing traffic calming devices, red lights etc etc all the time. Imagine the carbon footprint of a new set of traffic lights over its lifetime?!

But that's ok, cause the government gets the cash from the fuel excise.... :/

scotty nm35 Grand Master

scotty nm35

Posted
Posted

Did you see the main point in there? Bicycles don't trigger the light circuit, so the lights will never change. I am sure many of the motorcyclists amongst us have blown a red for that very reason. I know I have had to many times over the years. Does this make me a criminal worthy of being stoned with spark plugs? Farkin wanker...

PN-Mad Grand Master

PN-Mad

Posted
Posted

"Several states have similar "Dead Red" laws, which lets cyclists (and motorcyclists) ride through a red light if there's no traffic, if the cyclists have stopped for set periods of time, and if the light isn't changing because its sensor doesn't register bikes."

Yes, I can see that, after stopping for a set amount of time, the cyclist can proceed through the intersection. They might also be able to use that magical button on the side of most traffic lights that turns them red to allow people to cross... ;)

Anyway, thanks, when did I ever say I chuck plugs at cyclists....? I thought my posts were pretty neutral....

scotty nm35 Grand Master

scotty nm35

Posted
Posted

Wanker comment was directed at the bloke suggesting it.

Cyclists aren't allowed on the footpath, and quite often are clipped into their pedals. Magical button? It's for pedestrians. Yet again, there are no facilities for cyclists in most cases. These would need to be included in any bike rego process.

PN-Mad Grand Master

PN-Mad

Posted
Posted

Wanker comment was directed at the bloke suggesting it.

Cyclists aren't allowed on the footpath, and quite often are clipped into their pedals. Magical button? It's for pedestrians. Yet again, there are no facilities for cyclists in most cases. These would need to be included in any bike rego process.

Carry a broom stick to push said button? :P

Then you can bash arsehole drivers who try to clip you, and also have a jousting session when you get to two lane bike paths! :D

  • Like 2
Daleo Grand Master

Daleo

Posted
Posted

Bicycle jousting is the best solution this thread has produced.

Nice work Luke!

Brb, off to get a broomstick.

It wasn't saying that cars expend no energy to get moving from a standstill, just that the driver isn't the one physically getting the car moving again; unlike the bicycle.

luke gtr Grand Master

luke gtr

Posted
Posted

Bicycle jousting is the best solution this thread has produced.

Nice work Luke!

Brb, off to get a broomstick.

It wasn't saying that cars expend no energy to get moving from a standstill, just that the driver isn't the one physically getting the car moving again; unlike the bicycle.

twasnt my idea, but I like it.
Daleo Grand Master

Daleo

Posted
Posted

You shall be forced to mount the toddler tricycle for the first round of bicycle jousting.

Mmm K?

Nay, I shall be astride the toddlers balance bike.

Yea verily; it has newfangled yellow plastic wheels, and an ooga horn.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
    • GTSBoy
      What brakes on R34 GTT(Europe)

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      310mm rotors will be avilable from Australia, Japan, and probably a few other places. Nothing for the front can be put on the back.
    • MBS206
      Starting again

      By MBS206 · Posted

      The filter only filters down to a specific size. Add to that, the filter is AFTER the pump. So it means everything starts breaking your pump even if its being filtered out.
    • MBS206
      What brakes on R34 GTT(Europe)

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Just like in being 14mm too small (296mm) makes it not fit, being 14mm too big (324mm) it also won't fit. You want to find the correct rotor.
    • Kapr
      What brakes on R34 GTT(Europe)

      By Kapr · Posted

      @GTSBoy Ok so that was the shops problem...they showed R33 rotors on R34 page and i did not know 296 do not fit(and are for R33) Yes i bought "kit" with rotors and pads. Pads are ok(i have GTT calipers front and rear). They have some 324mm but no 310mm. So i dont know if they would fit. I have 17inch LMGT4s So another question. Can i fit those in the rear or they are just "too" big for that?
×
×
  • Create New...