Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Does anyone out there drive a V35 as their daily and manage to squeeze the kids/grocery shopping in the back? I have a four year old son and his child seat will need to be secured

I see the boot is very large!

Im tempted to try and find an import dealership in Brisbane to take a look at one in the flesh, any recomendations for a dealership?

Thanks

Daniel

Hey man kids are fine at the back and is more than enough space for groceries...you can also fold the rear seats dpwn for larger items as well minus the kid/s though.... I have a sub in the boot and I can still manage groceries haha get 1! Awesome cars

  • Like 1

Yep, I have 2 seats in the back of my V35 for a 6 year old and 3 year old. No problems. The boots are big enough for groceries, but not really for anything else tbh. I would NOT call them a big boot, but they are adequate. At least groceries from a Coles catalogue can fit in there. You can't quite fit 2 decent size wheels in there, which sucks.

  • 2 months later...

13 & 17 year olds in the back, Sydney and back many times, QLD etc no problems or whinging, well apart from their fighting at times , haha .

lots of boot for trips.

I added APS twin turbo system to the 350GT and with its torque it is a quick family car :)

I gave my 350GT to my Son today and miss it already. If you ever want it to really get going add a twin turbo system, with that motor and torque :woot:

But I still have my R34 :wub: :wub: :wub:

Adding TT will bring it a bees tit more powerful or less than a 370 right? 200KW to 249KW I love my new 370GT Type SP, I love the new improved look of the headlights too

Edited by N3ptuNe

Adding TT will bring it a bees tit more powerful or less than a 370 right? 200KW to 249KW I love my new 370GT Type SP, I love the new improved look of the headlights too

It would smash it.

Like to see some cold hard evidence it will smash it. 370GT is way faster than a 350GT My TRD AURION smashed my mates 350GT literally killed it didn’t stand a chance… Every morning for 5 years was another slaughter lol , and my 370 is faster than the TRD. I was almost going to buy a 350 but “IMO” the headlights are unsightly. Wack a TT on the 370 she’ll probably do 11’s

Edited by N3ptuNe

Understood, fair enough, agreed. id rather supercharger personally, anyway way off topic... Back too, Plenty of room in the back if your 5.10 or below.. as per post i'm exactly 181cm 6ft i couldn't sit there for to long i will get a sore neck as the back wind screen is quite low.

Adding TT will bring it a bees tit more powerful or less than a 370 right? 200KW to 249KW I love my new 370GT Type SP, I love the new improved look of the headlights too

I know they say they were 200 ish KWs mine was 182KW on the dyno before the tune, did a soft tune at 255 kw, does not seem much but great fun. Had a bloke with a 350Z and I smashed it, he went and put the APS TT system on,haha Off topic :(

It is not a back seat for 6Ft + , they sit in the front on long trips , even if they have to drive :)

  • Like 1

Have had my 3 & 4yo girls in the back seat of mine on 3-4 hour road trips no problems at all. It actually seems like it has more leg room for them than my partners 4 door bmw sedan boot space is fine for carting our gear around also. Very smooth and comfy on longer trips I liked the fuel range on the open highway 700-800k + per tank was good.

Only annoying thing was putting the seats forward when it's time for rear passengers to get out..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...