Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

no worries. It was well over a year when I did mine and can't recall how much it needed to be lengthened but we are talking 1 or 2mm, it's a very small adjustment. Don't know if you've played around with your on alignments much but once you're in the range of where you want to be it comes down to very small adjustments indeed. Eg - front tie rods/rack ends, 1/2 a turn of these gives a couple of mm toe change (sorry not near my notes to say exactly) and I end up making adjustments like 1/8th of a turn to get it feeling 'just right'. Anyway what I'm getting at is, if you work out the percentage of how much it needs to be lengthened and you look at it and go, it's almost exactly the bloody same, it probably won't be once you get it on the car and it's doing it's job.

You can make a bump-steer gauge for around $100, main cost of that is the micrometer which is handy for all sorts of other measurements anyway and good to have if you've not got already.

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445063-r33-gtst-track-build/?p=7522364

This shows how you can sort bump steer issues yourself. Total cost of bits and pieces maybe $150 including a Chinese hydraulic bottle jack. Assuming you already have a set of chassis stands and trolley jack plus a level concrete floor to work on.

It just depends how motivated you are to learn and have a go, vs finding a suspension specialist that knows how to sort these issues without charging ridiculous money.

BTW, the relationship between the camber arm and traction arm might not be as per the suggestions above. If you want to stand the tyre more upright (good idea, target about 0.5 to 0.75 neg) then do that first.

For the bump steer, think about what the wheel has been doing at this point to achieve the bad handling. Wheel goes up, and starts pointing (toeing) out. That means the traction arm is too long. You should look at shortening the traction arm. Comments about small adjustments making a big difference are true. It's not something you should do by eye because there's no way of knowing what geometry you've actually achieved. If the arms aren't installed yet, do a measurement from centre to centre and match them to stock.

Then acquire all the low tech but reliable bits to stringline and adjust to your heart's content.

  • Like 1

No it doesn't.

But it's toe out that brings about the lack of rear end stability that's the issue under discussion.

If it's toeing in under bump, then it should generally stay reasonably composed.

None of it is rocket science, and much easier to understand if explained simply. With basic equipment it can be corrected with fairly minor adjustment.

Thanks for your post Dale that's a pretty nifty setup you've got there, it's good to know that DIY alignment is possible if one is keen enough!

I just chucked in the adjustable traction rods, luckily I had done the Whiteline eccentric bushing kit previously so the nuts weren't crazy seized.

Here's how the camber arms measure (bolt-to-bolt roughly at the middle):

  • LH: OEM 309mm vs. adjustable currently at 314mm
  • RH: OEM 310mm vs. adjustable currently at 314mm

So there's about +5mm per side to correct for negative camber that'd otherwise creep in with this amount of drop. That's about +1.6% compared to OEM length.

Here's the traction rod measurements:

  • LH: OEM 210mm vs. new adjustable set to 212mm
  • RH: OEM 211mm vs. new adjustable set to 213mm

+1.6% on 210mm is approximate +3.4mm but I decided to play it safe and only do +2mm for now. The suspension shop can work out a better setting :)

I'll be interesting getting the whole dynamic geometry right with three separate points of adjustment (traction rod, camber arm, HICAS eliminator arm)...

Based on a quick drive the car does feel better, more stable around bumpy corners. Good stuff.

  • 1 month later...

...

Based on a quick drive the car does feel better, more stable around bumpy corners. Good stuff.

Quick update on this just in case anyone else is having bump steer issues.

I was putting stiffer springs on my BC BR coilovers last week and noticed that one of the rears had a slight leak, rear right to be precise, which is where the bump steer issue was most evident.

I replaced the insert (shock) last night and lo and behold, the bump steer is good as gone! I compared the old shock to the new by hand and there was very little damping in the old one. So essentially the rear corner has been hanging pretty much by the spring only, no wonder it felt all vague and jittery...

Also for context I had previously replaced my left rear shock last year as it got super squeaky; I probably should have been more suspicious of the RH one now. The left side lasted just under 20,000kms and the right about 30,000. I'm not sure if it's the sedan or these coilovers specifically but the rears seem to wear out quicker than the fronts.

Lessons learned:

  • Always check the most obvious things first
  • Change things in pairs where you can

Traction Tyres in Rowville.

x111111111ty.

Have read that Tyrepower North Melbourne are also good.

That'd satisfy the "inner Melbourne" part of your post ;)

Thanks for the tip Greg, I took the car to Tyrepower North Melbourne today. Great service and aligned exactly to the specs I wanted, at about half the cost compared to the previous place I used to go to. Thumbs up!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...