Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

no worries. It was well over a year when I did mine and can't recall how much it needed to be lengthened but we are talking 1 or 2mm, it's a very small adjustment. Don't know if you've played around with your on alignments much but once you're in the range of where you want to be it comes down to very small adjustments indeed. Eg - front tie rods/rack ends, 1/2 a turn of these gives a couple of mm toe change (sorry not near my notes to say exactly) and I end up making adjustments like 1/8th of a turn to get it feeling 'just right'. Anyway what I'm getting at is, if you work out the percentage of how much it needs to be lengthened and you look at it and go, it's almost exactly the bloody same, it probably won't be once you get it on the car and it's doing it's job.

You can make a bump-steer gauge for around $100, main cost of that is the micrometer which is handy for all sorts of other measurements anyway and good to have if you've not got already.

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445063-r33-gtst-track-build/?p=7522364

This shows how you can sort bump steer issues yourself. Total cost of bits and pieces maybe $150 including a Chinese hydraulic bottle jack. Assuming you already have a set of chassis stands and trolley jack plus a level concrete floor to work on.

It just depends how motivated you are to learn and have a go, vs finding a suspension specialist that knows how to sort these issues without charging ridiculous money.

BTW, the relationship between the camber arm and traction arm might not be as per the suggestions above. If you want to stand the tyre more upright (good idea, target about 0.5 to 0.75 neg) then do that first.

For the bump steer, think about what the wheel has been doing at this point to achieve the bad handling. Wheel goes up, and starts pointing (toeing) out. That means the traction arm is too long. You should look at shortening the traction arm. Comments about small adjustments making a big difference are true. It's not something you should do by eye because there's no way of knowing what geometry you've actually achieved. If the arms aren't installed yet, do a measurement from centre to centre and match them to stock.

Then acquire all the low tech but reliable bits to stringline and adjust to your heart's content.

  • Like 1

No it doesn't.

But it's toe out that brings about the lack of rear end stability that's the issue under discussion.

If it's toeing in under bump, then it should generally stay reasonably composed.

None of it is rocket science, and much easier to understand if explained simply. With basic equipment it can be corrected with fairly minor adjustment.

Thanks for your post Dale that's a pretty nifty setup you've got there, it's good to know that DIY alignment is possible if one is keen enough!

I just chucked in the adjustable traction rods, luckily I had done the Whiteline eccentric bushing kit previously so the nuts weren't crazy seized.

Here's how the camber arms measure (bolt-to-bolt roughly at the middle):

  • LH: OEM 309mm vs. adjustable currently at 314mm
  • RH: OEM 310mm vs. adjustable currently at 314mm

So there's about +5mm per side to correct for negative camber that'd otherwise creep in with this amount of drop. That's about +1.6% compared to OEM length.

Here's the traction rod measurements:

  • LH: OEM 210mm vs. new adjustable set to 212mm
  • RH: OEM 211mm vs. new adjustable set to 213mm

+1.6% on 210mm is approximate +3.4mm but I decided to play it safe and only do +2mm for now. The suspension shop can work out a better setting :)

I'll be interesting getting the whole dynamic geometry right with three separate points of adjustment (traction rod, camber arm, HICAS eliminator arm)...

Based on a quick drive the car does feel better, more stable around bumpy corners. Good stuff.

  • 1 month later...

...

Based on a quick drive the car does feel better, more stable around bumpy corners. Good stuff.

Quick update on this just in case anyone else is having bump steer issues.

I was putting stiffer springs on my BC BR coilovers last week and noticed that one of the rears had a slight leak, rear right to be precise, which is where the bump steer issue was most evident.

I replaced the insert (shock) last night and lo and behold, the bump steer is good as gone! I compared the old shock to the new by hand and there was very little damping in the old one. So essentially the rear corner has been hanging pretty much by the spring only, no wonder it felt all vague and jittery...

Also for context I had previously replaced my left rear shock last year as it got super squeaky; I probably should have been more suspicious of the RH one now. The left side lasted just under 20,000kms and the right about 30,000. I'm not sure if it's the sedan or these coilovers specifically but the rears seem to wear out quicker than the fronts.

Lessons learned:

  • Always check the most obvious things first
  • Change things in pairs where you can

Traction Tyres in Rowville.

x111111111ty.

Have read that Tyrepower North Melbourne are also good.

That'd satisfy the "inner Melbourne" part of your post ;)

Thanks for the tip Greg, I took the car to Tyrepower North Melbourne today. Great service and aligned exactly to the specs I wanted, at about half the cost compared to the previous place I used to go to. Thumbs up!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...