Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm chasing after abit of info on some rear lsd diff choices for my GTR 32 I'm running standard gear ratios front and rear, and the standard rear lsd. my front diff is a quaife helical. But I was wonder weather to run the standard lsd, 1.5 or 2 way in the rear, the reason I ask is that I've found a 2way pretty cheap but I don't want to just rush in and buy it without any advice. the car will be used for track/club days, drag racing and some street use. Any help or advice is greatly appreciated as I don't no much about diffs . Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/450020-lsd-diff-choice/
Share on other sites

Mainly track days and drags , powercruise etc I'm running the car on drummed e85 because tas only has one e85 pump in hobart. I had a bit of a search I was wondering who has used what kind of setups, like a helical front diff and a 2way rear wondering if they are a good or bad together, I was also reading about the transfer case mod with the extra plates, might be the go whist the motor is out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/450020-lsd-diff-choice/#findComment-7414508
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

32 GTR comes with a 2 way mechanical diff stock, you don't need a new centre.

If you want a tighter centre (or if you prefer, a "Nismo" rear diff), just have a diff shop add some more clutch plates

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/450020-lsd-diff-choice/#findComment-7424644
Share on other sites

While I am here I will take a chance of being shot down, I had some info that my R34GTR has a Nismo 2-way LSD but it does not clunk or bonk, chatter or clatter when going slowly on lock.

It was on a work sheet for the car before I bought it, is it possible that it is still a Nismo 2-Way LSD????

Can you tell by looking at the outside of the casing????

Edited by TT350GT
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/450020-lsd-diff-choice/#findComment-7426730
Share on other sites

As I understand it the 2 way locks up on acceleration and deceleration and the 1.5 on acceleration and 50% as much on deceleration.

It has been said that the 2 way is very clunky at low speed on lock, what makes the 2 way more clunky than a 1.5 way, the 1.5 still fully locks on acceleration, why would it be any different, maybe in reverse ??

Edited by TT350GT
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/450020-lsd-diff-choice/#findComment-7426746
Share on other sites

No, you misunderstand the differences and the behaviours.

1 way only limits slip (there is no such thing as "lock") when under accel.

1.5 way limits slip on accel and partially (ie, to a lesser degree) on decel.

2 way limits slip fairly equally on both accel and decel.

If the breakaway torque (ie, how tight the diff is) is set quite high, then a 2 way will be nasty to drive around in carparks and the like because it will behave as if it is locked. If the breakaway torque is set at a lower level then you can generally get a 2 way to cruise around without being too painful. A 1 way will almost always be OK to idle around in carparks because you don't have much drive power on. So you're not accelerating and therefore not engaging the ramps that apply the clutches.

The standard R3x GTR diff is a 2 way anyway. A Nismo diff is essentially the same thing just with higher breakaway torque setting.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/450020-lsd-diff-choice/#findComment-7426778
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...