Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looks like ill be a new foxtel subscriber then...

I stuffed around downloading Sky rips after the events last year and it is just down right painfull..

It just shits me, that i cant "only" pay for motorsports channels. I dont watch any other form of sport... why the hell do i need to pay $60 per month for shit im not going to watch -.-

Thats a huge rip off, considering that you are essentially paying $43.5 per race weekend...

Thats $60 p/m + $150 Install / 20 races per year.

What a joke.

It's almost worth signing up for a NOW TV whole week pass ~2 times a month and pulling it down through a UK supplied VPN connection. If only that was legal. -.-

Sports channels are only $25 a month. The rest is just your base subscription. Although I see your point if you are joining purely for F1

Id like a dedicated channel but looks like its just going to be on fox sports 1, 2 or 3. At least we will see practice, qually and race live anyway. Somethimes I tried streaming practice but was almost always useless

My live streams always worked for practice, race day they sometimes lagged due to all the viewers I imagine, but I pretty much only watched for the pre race and during the 300 odd ad breaks 10 managed to fit into a race.

Will be sweet to get all of that in HD without any of the lag etc

WTF are Bernie and his lackies up to? So they are banning drivers chamging their helmet designs mid season!

What a farking joke. Why are they wasting their time discussing such matters when they had two teams go out of business at the end of last season. Force India and Sauber look shaky. You have big name teams that can't attract a series sponsor. You have a historic GP venue in the middle of Europe saying they can't afford to host the GP and the other venue can't afford it back to back...

...and they decide to talk about what F1 drivers are doing with their helmets.

It annoys me to see such a great sport being completely farked / raped by capitalist douchebags

Yeah that is a bit lame, I always enjoyed seeing the different helmets. Having the same one all the time does get a bit boring, then again changing every race is a bit stupid too (vettel). Maybe they should limit it to 5 changes a year maximum. It's a bit annoying they always want to appeal to the casual viewer and not the true fans that watch every or most races.

I will be there Sat. Still not sure about springing the cash for Sunday or going to Malaysian GP. I am going to JoeSaward on Fri night to hear him moan on about things

Survey of fans on helmet decision!

Yes – it's important that drivers maintain design so we can recognise them in the car 21.29% (306 votes)
Yes – it speaks to the heritage of the sport 13.57% (195 votes)
No – this is more interference in driver individuality on the part of the teams and FIA 21.64% (311 votes)
No – F1 has far more important issues to address than livery design 43.49% (625 votes)

Total Votes: 1,437

AMA SuperCross / Motocross The riders change helmets between practice/race sessions

Fark even I change gear/helmet between races.

Maybe if they put numbers on the cars we could farking recognize them......hows that for a novel idea.

Poor Alonso. Should have taken my advice and served his last year out at Fezz and signed an option for McLaren in 2015. But first see what the first proper James Allison car was like. McLaren have built some horrible cars over the years and when the fluked upon a good one in 2012 they threw it away for a rubbish evolution in 2013 :(

And now you have the woeful Honda engine...looks as bad/worst than Renault given their budget and time to prepare.

Oh well, i am ready to right them off for 2015.

Remember Red Bull last year? Horrible pre season with numerous break downs/issues. Then come Melbourne and they got a car home in second (ignoring the post race issues)

Helmets; well I think changing too often is no good but every so often for special races I like it. I remember when Mclaren drivers used to run the special helmets in Monaco (for a sponsor, forget who) with diamonds in them etc. Vettel was taking it a bit far but I think its funny that they made the ruling against helmet changes 'to help fans distinguish the drivers' yet the poll shows the fans are not concerned.

AMA SuperCross / Motocross The riders change helmets between practice/race sessions

Fark even I change gear/helmet between races.

Maybe if they put numbers on the cars we could farking recognize them......hows that for a novel idea.

They do put numbers on the cars (well some teams do anyway) it's just that they aren't very big, and often on the top of the nose where you can't see them anyway. They need big light up ones like the WEC cars have

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Sounds good.  I don't 100% understand what your getting at here. When you say, "I keep seeing YouTube videos where people have new paint and primer land on the old clearcoat that isn't even dulled down" do you mean this - there is a panel with factory paint, without any prep work, they paint the entire panel with primer, then colour then clear?  If that's what you mean, sure it will "stick" for a year, 2 years, maybe 3 years? Who knows. But at some stage it will flake off and when it does it's going to come off in huge chunks and look horrific.  Of course read your technical data sheet for your paint, but generally speaking, you can apply primer to a scuffed/prepped clear coat. Generally speaking, I wouldn't do this. I would scuff/prep the clear and then lay colour then clear. Adding the primer to these steps just adds cost and time. It will stick to the clear coat provided it has been appropriately scuffed/prepped first.  When you say, "but the new paint is landing on the old clearcoat" I am imagining someone not masking up the car and just letting overspray go wherever it wants. Surely this isn't what you mean?  So I'll assume the following scenario - there is a small scratch. The person manages to somehow fill the scratch and now has a perfectly flat surface. They then spray colour and clear over this small masked off section of the car. Is this what you mean? If this is the case, yes the new paint will eventually flake off in X number of years time.  The easy solution is to scuff/prep all of the paint that hasn't been masked off in the repair area then lay the paint.  So you want to prep the surface, lay primer, then lay filler, then lay primer, then colour, then clear?  Life seems so much simpler if you prep, fill, primer, colour then clear.  There are very few reasons to go to bare metal. Chasing rust is a good example of why you'd go to bare metal.  A simple dent, there is no way in hell I'm going to bare metal for that repair. I've got enough on my plate without creating extra work for myself lol. 
    • Hi, Got the membership renewal email but haven't acted yet.  I need to change my address first. So if somebody can email me so I can change it that would be good.    
    • Bit of a similar question, apprently with epoxy primer you can just sand the panel to 240 grit then apply it and put body filler on top. So does that basically mean you almost never have to go to bare metal for simple dents?
    • Good to hear. Hopefully you're happy enough not to notice when driving and just enjoy yourself.
    • I mean, most of us just love cars. Doesnt necessarily have to be a skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...