Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So lately i've been researching crankcase ventilation and as there is not much posted about M35's I thought i might start a discussion about it.

As long as i can remember, i have had a bit of a cloud of smoke when ever i dump it when the rpm is in the higher range. I have found that the cause of this is inadequate crankcase ventilation and evacuation.

The stock system is probably ok for a stock car but once the car is a bit modified and power is increased and especially if boost pressure is increased, then the stock system cant keep up. So here is how the stock system works:

ALL engines produce some amount of "blow-by" (which is basically a mixture of oil, oil vapour, unburnt fuel and hydrocarbons - or exhaust fumes) which is 'blown by' the piston rings and end up in the crankcase. As this continues happening as the engine runs, it builds pressure in the crankcase. This horrible mixture then makes its way up to the heads. Originally and even in some cases now people vent it to the atmosphere through a "breather" filter, however it is now not emissions legal and it stinks and it doesn't create a vacuum to suck the blow-by out of the head.

For it to be emisions legal it must be recirculated through the intake and re-burnt. It also actually lowers the octane of fuel, but depending on how much blow-by your engine creates depends how much octane is reduced. The stock setup does this via a PCV (positive crankcase ventilation) valve which is basically a oneway or check valve with a spring in it so that it opens differently to different amounts of vacuum. Under strong vacuum (eg, idle) it is slightly open, under medium vacuum (eg, throttle open but not boosting) it is completely open, and under pressure (eg, boosting) it is completely closed. It is located on the front of the right rocker cover and has a vacuum line running to the manifold. Even with a stock setup this should and is meant to be replaced every 100,000kms, as if it blocks, spring stretches, gets sticky or fails completely then the motor suffers and you can end up blowing seals, smokey exhaust, poor fuel economy and much more.

Before the blow-by evacuates through the PCV it passes through a series of baffles in the rocker covers in an attempt to separate air from oil. As the PCV is not open all the time and even at the most important times (eg, under hard acceleration) the motor must vent the pressure somewhere. On the VQ25DET there is a vacuum line running from the back of the left rocker cover to the intake before the turbo but after the air flow meter (MAF). This line also has a oneway/check valve in it to only let pressure out. The intake before the turbo is always under vacuum which assists in evacuating the heads building pressure. The only time fresh air is taken in is when the intake manifold is in light vacuum.

There are many ways to evacuate or relieve the pressure. Some are expensive and some are cheap. Most use an oil catch can which is made as an oil/air separator to catch the funky mixture so that it doesn't re-enter the engine and can be drained and discarded.

Another point to consider is that it is apparently better for the crankcase to be under vacuum, rather than pressure, as it supposedly helps seat the piston rings better providing a better seal and therefore less blow-by and better combustion.

So, below is a pic of how i have done mine. I have a small filter on the intake line for the head, so this does actually introduce unmetered fresh air into the intake, but only on idle (which i don't mind). I have drilled out the PCV, removed the check valve at the back of the motor and introduced new check valves (which you can see in the lines - they are silver). I have also installed baffles in the catch can so that it actually works as a catch can. So the check valves allow vacuum from the manifold but close when its in positive pressure when vacuum is then introduced from the pre-turbo intake. I'm not saying everyone should do it like this and i'm sure there are probably better ways, i just thought i would put out some more info. The end result is that it works! No smoke out the back at any time and the car runs a little better.

Just my 0.02c. What do you guys think? More input from more experienced m35ers?

post-29959-0-40500600-1420460405_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

Thankfully it's much easier on a vq35, as mine just adds a catch can between the PCV and the return to the manifold.

Often overlooked is whether the can actually contains anything! Lots of the cheap cans have no baffling nor contents inside. Meaning, it's basically useless. I have a fairly large can, and it's stuffed with about 5 expanded stainless steel pot scrubbers! This provides the scrubbing action to remove oil from the normal crankcase gasses. Works really well. The crap doesn't build up in the manifold or the back of the throttle plate anymore.

On all cars you can simply add a catch can (seperator) onto the line returning to the pre turbo inlet. And leave everything else alone.

The blowby doesn't go into the manifold through the pcv, as it's shut when under decent load, and under low load there should be very little blowby to worry about.

  • Like 1

Then you should have a look under the plenum of a high km vq35....

It's not nice. There is lots of oil in the gallery's that lead to the runners, and it covers everything in there.

Then you should have a look under the plenum of a high km vq35....

It's not nice. There is lots of oil in the gallery's that lead to the runners, and it covers everything in there.

That typically doesn't come through the pcv. A catch can on its own would sort it

Yeah i stuffed mine with stainless wool too Alex.

Nathan, it is an Auto one cheapo. The catch cans that work (ie with baffling) are rather expensive.

Thats right Ben, but a catch can on its own wouldn't create continual vacuum, which is what i was after. I had a catch can on its own but still experienced the WOT smoke.

I had a catch can in Ben's suggested location on my R33 and had no troubles what so ever. It worked well which is why i did the same on the M35 - didn't work well. I'm guessing the combination of high compression and high km's (wear) is what makes the VQ25DET want to ''breath'' more

Also, catch cans should fill up on any car. If it doesn't fill up, then it is not installed properly or doesn't have baffling to separate the vapour. If it fills up too quickely then you have other problems to worry about.

My catch can only ever has moisture and ethanol fumes, hardly any oil. I guess it has nothing to do with power or boost and more to do with bore wear.

It did always blow a little smoke each morning, just oil from the pcv leaking down inside the plenum and sitting on an intake valve overnight.

  • 8 months later...

Boost controller I suspect. The stock solenoid is best left plugged in electrically, then remove the bleed T and insert the controller.

As the wastegate actuator is only 7psi it may be hard to hold any decent boost in the top end without getting a stiffer spring for the actuator, to hold the wastegate puck shut better.

For what it's worth, I ran two catch cans on my VQ25det Stagea. One on each bank of course.

The intake side never required changing as there was never really anything in there.

The driver side (PCV if my memory serves me) however, caught quite a bit of oil.

  • 2 months later...

I wouldn't bother with catch cans, my engine never spewed oil, even at 8000 revs and 40psi at the track. Emptying it is just another thing to worry about when servicing, let the moisture and vapours burn I say.

I got about 200ml of oil out if my catch can last time I emptied it, it was a good 4 months that It had been since but still seems like a fair bit of oil for four months of running it. I have put a new pcv valve in about 1 month ago see how it goes with that till next empty

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...