Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My wife and I were given fitbit's as a gift. I instantly thought what a useless, crappy gadget these things are, but after a solid two weeks of daily use I'm now used to it. I'm still not exactly sure what the actual benefit of these things are. The biggest advantage I've become I aware of is that I have something attached to me like a prison bracelet that remembers everything I do and tells me how shit I am at the end of the week, so I have a mental reminder to get active and not eat bad food.

Obviously, all of the data retrieved is taken with a grain of salt and I consider it 'indication only', however the device has me led me to understand that I sleep terribly and don't exercise for long enough periods at a time.

Does anyone else use one? And what sort of advantages or disadvantages have you encountered?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453209-fitness-gadgets/
Share on other sites

I find any and all fitness gadgets redundant. They are usually glorified pedometers and technology for the sake of technology. Okay, so it can sync your activity with your phone and tablet and you're all connected and shit - that's cool that it can do that - but so what? What's the end result here and does it really help you to achieve your goals over and above say, a $2 stopwatch or straight out dieting/exercising.

I feel like most people who buy these things think that it will help them to exercise more or give them an advantage when doing so. Instead you end up with people saying I did 20,000 steps today (like anyone else with an office job who runs errands). It's just another way out of good old fashioned hard work, not unlike buying a Wii Fit or some ab pro that does the sit-ups for you.

It's unbelievable how much these little things have taken off and all the companies jumping on board for the ride - probably the best example of trending I've seen in a long time, given only a few years ago we had wristwatch heart rate monitors (which *can* actually be useful during exercise) and garmin gps trackers and hardly anyone wanted a bar of that. Remember when those stupid power balance bands came out and everyone wanted the "cheap" / easy competitive advantage? Lulz were had.

I think that gadgetry *may* have it's place with the elite athlete and coach looking for proper biofeedback, but for the average person going for runs and heading to the gym it's a giant wank. Whatever does it for you though - if it actually makes you exercise then more power to you, but you shouldn't need a wristband to make you want to do that - if you do then the motivation simply won't last. If nothing else you've got a wrist worn alarm clock that the CIA can track you with.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453209-fitness-gadgets/#findComment-7469310
Share on other sites

Woah steady on compadres. I wouldn't write them off totally.

I think there is absolutely a wank factor and unless you utilise them to their full potential, they are useless.

I would say it has acted as an incentive to run an extra km or do an extra set at the gym.

Is that benefit worth ~$180 and looking like a twat? Maybe.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453209-fitness-gadgets/#findComment-7469457
Share on other sites

I'm taking the middle ground in that I agree with Birds for the most part that they're just a gimmick that in no way actually assists you in exercising. A pedometer didn't make you get up and walk those 20,000 steps; you'd have done them anyway, only difference being that you didn't count them. Same calories burnt.....and like f**king hell they're worth the money. No way.

HOWEVER

Having used apps such as Strava for recording my pushbike rides, and an app called Jucy for recording my lifting sessions, I do find the information they present you VERY useful even though what you 'did' wouldn't have been any different whether you recorded it or not.

The advantage I find is mostly motivational, though it's also good to be able to look back through various logs and see exactly where you need to make changes/improvements to progress. I'm not sure of the entire range of Fitbit's features, though things like the apps I use let you know things like segment times so you can try to better it next time, and total combined weight lifted across all sets for a particular lift so you can always make sure you move more than last time :)

TL;DR - they have their place and advantages, but for the most part they're not really going to make or break anything....other than your wallet in a lot of cases.

FWIW Jucy cost me like US$1.99 after the free trial period, and Strava is free entirely.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453209-fitness-gadgets/#findComment-7469507
Share on other sites

i dislike the fitbit. The one with the heart rate monitor would be handy for the limited times that i do cardio, but that's about it.

These on the other hand look interesting:

https://www.atlaswearables.com/

https://www.gymwatch.com/

And if this means that i never have to cook again, ill take 10

http://www.naturalmachines.com/

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453209-fitness-gadgets/#findComment-7472699
Share on other sites

Fit bit ultimately does the same thing. Unless you forget how many reps you've done, they are not to dissimilar.

I've come to see the benefits of these things. Perhaps because I got mine as a gift i don't have to weigh up the cost benefit as much.

The heart rate monitor is great for a bit of extra accuracy in calorie burn.

Like all of these devices, the most taxing element is entering your diet intake. It's a critical condition of assessing total health if you're looking at making diet/exercise changes.

Edited by Floyd Westwood
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453209-fitness-gadgets/#findComment-7472719
Share on other sites

i dislike the fitbit. The one with the heart rate monitor would be handy for the limited times that i do cardio, but that's about it.

These on the other hand look interesting:

https://www.atlaswearables.com/

https://www.gymwatch.com/

And if this means that i never have to cook again, ill take 10

http://www.naturalmachines.com/

All of this is, again, technology for the sake of technology. Cool concept and what fitbit and co will eventually evolve into...but do we really need a watch to count how many reps we pushed out...if so, you're missing the mental edge that comes from knowing how many reps you've done and how fat off a pb you are. It also wouldn't track form for both arms during a bench press, for example. I could think of a hundred other faults in relying on such technology. Pointless analysis in a society obsessed with facts and figures instead of trusting our senses which are yet to be rivaled for efficacy. Utter waste of time.

And that food printer sounds make believe...fresh ingredients? Except that 3D printing takes hours and hours even for simple things.

/rant

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453209-fitness-gadgets/#findComment-7472844
Share on other sites

All of this is, again, technology for the sake of technology. Cool concept and what fitbit and co will eventually evolve into...but do we really need a watch to count how many reps we pushed out...if so, you're missing the mental edge that comes from knowing how many reps you've done and how fat off a pb you are. It also wouldn't track form for both arms during a bench press, for example. I could think of a hundred other faults in relying on such technology. Pointless analysis in a society obsessed with facts and figures instead of trusting our senses which are yet to be rivaled for efficacy. Utter waste of time.

And that food printer sounds make believe...fresh ingredients? Except that 3D printing takes hours and hours even for simple things.

/rant

One of the gadgets u can buy more sensors to track stuff for.

The foodini will be good in a few years imo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453209-fitness-gadgets/#findComment-7472847
Share on other sites

All of this is, again, technology for the sake of technology. Cool concept and what fitbit and co will eventually evolve into...but do we really need a watch to count how many reps we pushed out...if so, you're missing the mental edge that comes from knowing how many reps you've done and how fat off a pb you are. It also wouldn't track form for both arms during a bench press, for example. I could think of a hundred other faults in relying on such technology. Pointless analysis in a society obsessed with facts and figures instead of trusting our senses which are yet to be rivaled for efficacy. Utter waste of time.

And that food printer sounds make believe...fresh ingredients? Except that 3D printing takes hours and hours even for simple things.

/rant

In bold. I think you're taking far too much of a blanket approach to this concept. Do you not use a notepad or some other method to record your workouts? How do you truly know you've bettered your last session for any given lift? Surely you don't rely on remembering "Ok, when I last did deadlifts 5 days ago, my sets were: warmup, 140kg x8/8/7/6/5, 130kg x6/5/4, 100kg x8/8/5"

I only need to think of one fault in NOT using something - you're relying on your memory to be accurate. Sure, it's not necessary, but back to the concept of lifting MORE - it just makes it easy to ensure you do lift more than last time. Even if only 1 rep overall. Considering the app I use Jucy takes all of 30 seconds to compile a workout before I start, then maybe another 5 seconds after each set to note the weight and reps.....I'd rather "rely" on technology than my f**ked out useless memory lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453209-fitness-gadgets/#findComment-7472919
Share on other sites

Actually I seriously do just remember what I did last time lol. It doesn't take much practice, but it's probably easy for me because I only do 4 exercises and 4-7 sets for each including warmup.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453209-fitness-gadgets/#findComment-7472923
Share on other sites

Even if they could, or they could do all sorts of wondrous things...I bring it back to my argument that the average athlete will see little benefit from the feedback. There's so much more middle ground to be made up from the lift/eat/rest categories before anyone would need to touch one to improve their training.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453209-fitness-gadgets/#findComment-7472997
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...