Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking into buying an R34 GTR, had a seller take the car of interest to a reputable workshop of my choice this morning for an inspection.

Compression test results are as follows:

C1 - 145

C2 - 147

C3 - 152

C4 - 148

C5 - 148

C6 - 130

Leak down test results:

C1 - 6.5%

C2 - 6%

C3 - 5%

C4 - 7%

C5 - 9%

C6 - 15%

Now, the motor has been rebuilt and has forgies etc that were done mid 2013 (seller has provided receipts). It has apparently only done ~ 6000kms since rebuild... But obviously I have my concerns.

After speaking with the owner of the shop who did the inspection he ensures me it is a solid example and will give me no grief for daily use. (No track work as it doesn't interest me + I live in the sticks).

Told me it pulls very hard and after performing a leak down test he has narrowed the cause of lower compression in cylinder # 6 down to the rings.

I am sure some of you folks have been through a similar situation in the past so I guess my questions are:

- Should I walk away?

- Should I run away?

- Is the deviation between the first five cylinders to the sixth of serious concern?

Any info/advice/experience will be greatly appreciated and help me make the right decision as these cars are not cheap!

Cheers

Edited by shaunus
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453786-rb26-compression-test-results/
Share on other sites

I had turfed the idea of buying that particular GTR the minute Fats said "walk away"hahaha.

You have to keep in mind that Fatz will probably lowball the guy, snatch the car out from under you and turn it into a track whore or wreck it for profit. Ulterior motives are ulterior! :P

  • Like 1

Walk away or budget to pull it apart, hone it and re-ring it. It wasn't run in properly.

This is in all probability what has happened. Yes it should get redone - but budget that and if the numbers stack up and the car is still good why not?

Link to car?

http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Nissan-Skyline-1999/SSE-AD-3066429/?Cr=4

To be honest mate, spending 50k on a car you'd want it to be near on perfect mechanically. I don't have the time nor patience to be bothered pulling the motor.

  • Like 1

a set of mild cams would drop the comp 30psi on a comp test, if that were the case those numbers would start to become decent..

In most other similar posts everyone is fine with a 10percent variance so why the walk away in this case?

Edited by AngryRB

a set of mild cams would drop the comp 30psi on a comp test, if that were the case those numbers would start to become decent..

In most other similar posts everyone is fine with a 10percent variance so why the walk away in this case?

A set of mild cams should affect all cylinders unless it's a scatter cam for a Mini. Besides, the leakdown results scale perfectly with compression results, indicating that it's all in the rings.

10% variance between cylinders is deemed acceptable for an original engine that's done a lot of miles. Not one that was supposedly recently put together carefully and only done 6000 kays since.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...