Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is a good little basic article to explain the effects of diff gearing. From WALLACE RACING. http://www.wallaceracing.com/reargear.htm

Rear End Gear Selection

As most Pontiac fans realize, changing rear gear ratios can yield a tremendous performance increase. Three questions sometimes arise when considering a change in rear end ratio: How will the change affect top speed?, How will the change affect fuel economy?, and How will the change affect exhaust emissions?

A change in rear gear ratio can be one of the most satisfying modifications you can make on your Pontiac, and it can be one of the most cost effective. For instance, changing from a 2.41:1 ratio to a 3.73:1 ratio will provide a rear wheel torque increase of 55%.

Figure I below is a chart of rear wheel torque increases; to find the torque increase for a proposed gear ratio change, find your present ratio in the left column and move across to the column that is headed by the proposed ratio, the percentage shown is the torque increase (negative percentages are torque decreases).

Providing you can get it to the ground (have sufficient traction) the 55% torque increase should substantially improve your quarter mile E.T. and push you back in the seat a lot harder! On the street,the drivability and responsiveness will be greatly improved.

There are some interesting points to ponder in a rear gear change. For instance, a 1978 Firebird with -the standard 400 (non T/A 6.6) engine originally equipped with 2.41:1 gears. With this combination the torque peak occurs at about 52 mph and the horsepower peak occurs at about 118 mph. The same gear with 3.73:1 gears reaches the torque peak at about 34 mph and the horsepower peaks at about 76 mph. The 3.73 gears convert this car from a "Freeway Cruiser" into a "Surface Street Stomper" that would have tremendous response at around town speeds and would probably get the best fuel economy at city speeds of 30-40 mph.

Now, consider a 1978 Firebird with the T/A 6.6 engine. When using 2.41:1 rear gears the torque occurs at about 92 mph and the horsepower peak occurs at about 131 mph - With 3.73:1 gears, T/A 6.6 car reaches the torque peak at about 59 mph and the horsepower peaks at about 85 mph

The 3.73:1 gears convert the T/A 6.6 car from a "Freeway Flyer" into a good highway or multipurpose car.
On both examples above the cars and gears considered were identical, the only difference was the engine, yet the peaks and most practical uses for each car varied greatly. The point of these examples is that a gear ratio that is perfect for one car could be a disaster in another car aiming for a similar performance goal, so you must consider the engine combination carefully when choosing the rear gear ratio. Another point that became obvious in the first example, is that the non-T/A 6.6 400 is woefully undercammed for high performance use. As you can see from the road horsepower graph (figure 2) below, the maximum vehicle speed is influenced by the rear gear ratio. The graph shows increasing horsepower and torque on the vertical axis and increasing vehicle speed on the horizontal axis. NOTE: All curves shown in this article are arbitrary but representative of actual relationships.
gear2c.jpg
You see five curves on the graph, two torque at rear wheel curves (for 2.41:1 and 3.73:1 ratios), two horsepower at rear wheel curves (for 2.41:1 and 3.73:1 ratios), and one horsepower required to maintain road speed curve. The two rear wheel torque curves show that increasing the gear ratio both causes the torque peak to occur at a lower road speed and increases the peak torque value. This is the primary explanation for the performance increase. The two rear wheel horsepower curves show that increasing the gear ratio causes the horsepower peak to occur at a lower road speed but the peak horsepower value is the same. The single "horsepower required" curve indicates the amount of horsepower required to maintain vehicle speed. The respective maximum vehicle speeds are indicated where the rear wheel horsepower curves intersect the "horsepower required" curve. Taken as a whole, the graph shows that a torque increase of 55% can be had while reducing maximum vehicle speed by only 8 mph,only a 6 % loss.

Edited by XGTRX

Because the torque at the wheels is higher at a particular rev point. So even though the engine characteristics have not changed directly the torque at the wheels have so therefore you will come on boost at a lower speed. As a result on a dyno you will see the torque curve plotted against wheel speed shifted to the left and even though the torque against rpm will be similar, it will be seen to ramp quicker against time because of the torque multiplication factor of the diff. But the torque against wheel speed and rate of acceleration is where it is at and that's what matters really.

Edited by XGTRX

Shit, based off that I'll go find some 6:1 diff gears and put it in the GTR. I forgot that it doesn't matter at what point in the rev range it comes on boost.

Apparently boost vs road speed is all that matters. Can't wait to shift at 25km/h after 0.3 seconds of boost

  • Like 1

Shit, based off that I'll go find some 6:1 diff gears and put it in the GTR. I forgot that it doesn't matter at what point in the rev range it comes on boost.

Apparently boost vs road speed is all that matters. Can't wait to shift at 25km/h after 0.3 seconds of boost

I think 5.2:1 is availble for the GTR diffs :yes:

Nah sorry mate the theory is correct and I have also seen it first hand. And on the road they are a lot different. Nothing to do with dyno plot either it's just used to illustrate torque to wheel speed difference. Rate of acceleration is night and day when comparing to standard gears. Obviously your experience is exactly the opposite to what many others have experienced, don't know how though.

Edited by XGTRX

Because the torque at the wheels is higher at a particular rev point. So even though the engine characteristics have not changed directly the torque at the wheels have so therefore you will come on boost at a lower speed. As a result on a dyno you will see the torque curve plotted against wheel speed shifted to the left and even though the torque against rpm will be similar, it will be seen to ramp quicker against time because of the torque multiplication factor of the diff. But the torque against wheel speed and rate of acceleration is where it is at and that's what matters really.

so what you're saying is boost doesn't come on at an earlier RPM and therefore lag has not been reduced?

Road speed yes it happens earlier including gear changes but engine speed (rpm) all happens exactly the same, hence it being an illusion of response but not a gain in actual response

Shit, based off that I'll go find some 6:1 diff gears and put it in the GTR. I forgot that it doesn't matter at what point in the rev range it comes on boost.

Apparently boost vs road speed is all that matters. Can't wait to shift at 25km/h after 0.3 seconds of boost

Put some GT12s on it while your at it. :P

I have seen multiple videos and talked to some people and even the the extra shift (r34 getrag) and R32 ran a 10 over old 11 second passes.

So I think that equals real world speed and response. I understand that the tops speed is slightly down (not buy much) and engine RPM at 110km is about 300rpm (odd) more. Also talked to someone that said even with his big HKS 2530's (505kw atw's) he said the 6spd conversion with 4.11 ratios has been one of the best modifications to real world speed.

I know boost doesn't come on earlier in RPM but have heard good things. Enough for me to take it into serious consideration later in the year.

Let me run a 1/4 in the coming summer season and then when 3rd goes run it again with the getrag haha.

I have seen multiple videos and talked to some people and even the the extra shift (r34 getrag) and R32 ran a 10 over old 11 second passes.

Watch the video again, the Motive DVD GTR car actually traps at a slower speed (so acceleration is actually worse with the 6 speed). The only reason it runs a 10 is because it gets off the line better...

Seat of pants feel vs actual performance usually is significantly different

  • Like 2

so his trap speed was less but time was better with the extra shift. Wonder how much softening the suspension helped.

im pretty interested in this convo. I can see both points been a fine line and valid.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Cheers. Skyline is back on the menu, can’t get rid of it. It’s like a child you don’t want, or herpes 
    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
×
×
  • Create New...