Jump to content
SAU Community

Rays Engineering Nismo Lmgt4 Wheels *rare*


Recommended Posts

For sale:
Brand: Rays Engineering
Model: LMGT4
Specs: 5x 114.3
Size: 19x8.5 +25; 19x9.5 +30
Set of 4
Willing to ship: pick up south side Brisbane/can post to most states in the eastern seaboard for additional cost
Tyres: yes plenty of tread left
Bridgestone rears, Yokohama fronts.
Includes Rays center caps and valve caps
Price: $3K ONO

These are in immaculate condition and a collectors item as they are no longer produced and rarely found in these specs. One small stone chip on the front wheel, the rest are spotless. These wheel widths and offsets are factory 350Z specs, but will fit most Nissans so please do your research.

P/S should also fit V36 Sedans perfectly!

More pics here

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/454702-rays-engineering-nismo-lmgt4-wheels-rare/

post-6973-0-08076300-1426201371.jpg

post-6973-0-98306900-1426201447.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How did you manage to squeeze those under V35 sedan guards? Camber? or stretched tyres?

I had to roll my rear guards slightly to fit 18x8 +30 rims with 245 tyres.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surprised you had to roll guards for 18x8! Those are pretty much factory specs. My Car is lowered about 40mm, rolled rear guards and the above pic was running 275 tires with no issues at all on 19x9.5 +30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coupe factory spec.. I think the standard sedan rims were more like +45 offset.

Anyway, they protrude very slightly outside the guard, so to get them to tuck under the guard without rubbing when the suspension compresses, I only had to roll them a little, not fully, probably only about 45deg.

Edited by sonicii
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

These are similar specs to mine and they fit well. Slight roll on the rear and all good. Just rolled that lip, didn't need to pump them or anything.

And Jon, I can't believe that these are for sale!!!! Such good wheels and from an owner who looks after them meticulously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
×
×
  • Create New...