Jump to content
SAU Community

Turbo Size Restiction, Good For Responce Or Will The Back Pressure Choke The Engine?


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I've got a question for you all.

A friend and I were having a discussion the other day about manifold back pressure vs turbo spooling.

And the possibility of running twin T2's on a 6into1 topmount manifold vs dual gtr manifolds.

If you were to run twin N1 High Flowed turbos in series.

(mounted T4 topmount manifold with 50mm waste gate,T4 to T2 adapter, 1st N1 Turbo with int w/gate,custom dump pipe to T2, 2nd N1 Turbo with int w/gate)

Would there be too much restriction of the exhaust gasses exiting the engine?

Most people have a hard time correctly sizing a single stage turbo system. Once you try to do compound compound/sequential yada yada yada type stuff, the chances of even an expert getting it right the first time fall to nearly zero.

Thanks for the replies guys,

Yes we were talking about a rb26.

I acutally have a rb 25/30 in a r33 gtr with a compound setup.

The engine was built by a friend in japan and the breathing designed by a friend in the states.

It runs a Borg Warner S400sx3 467 with a 1.10ar turbine housing, Mounted on a 6BOOST feeding a gt2860.

The car has been shedded for the last 8 years.

It was an animal to drive, boost from 2300rpm right up to 7000rpm.

Torque kept breaking 3rd gear.

Yes, so you should already be aware that compound systems require a bigun and a littlun and you have to share the pressure drop from the ex manifold to atmosphere between 2 turbine stages. How much power you need to extract from the gas at each stage to run the compressor for that stage is the million dollar question and sets the fraction of the total pressure drop you allocate to each stage.

Inevitably, unless it's intended to be some constant speed mega power engine with no response, in order to have any response at all you'll end up with a higher exhaust manifold pressure than a single turbo stage system would have. But you compensate for that by having monster boost to balance it. If you don't have monster boost, then you're wasting your time building a compound turbo system, because monster boost is really the only good reason to stage compressors*. And monster boost and petrol engines don't go together too well. It's great on diesels.

* most of the time anyway. I know about the Pike's Peak truck and so on and so forth. Let it lie.

If you really really want to make a responsive compressor system with boost from nothing, then the smart money is on using a positive displacement blower as one of the stages. It allows you to only have one turbine stage in the exhaust path, and that turbine stage can have a really relaxed housing, resulting in less ex manifold pressure than other similarly powerful engines. The pos disp blower gives you boost from nearly nothing, the relatively low pressure ratio at each compressor stage helps to keep temperature rise under control and limits the extremity of design of the compressor wheel and so on. It's all good.

We were just chatting about running them on his rb26.

And I thought about the possibility of running them this way and feeding the airflow into my S400.

Instead of my current configuration where the S400 feeds air to the 2860.

Hang on. So you weren't talking about using the 2 x T28s in series with each other? They'd be a parallel pair and they'd work with another bigger turbo? Well that's different. It's sure to be a clusterf**k, but it's different.

  • Like 1

Here's what happens. When you joins two compressors together and run off two exhaust wheels in series. It works out as you have one massive compressor running off the first turbine wheel in the series. You must blank the larger turbo on initial spool, as pressure always "leak" from the weaker exist. It might work with a complex gating system, you will be fighting to get room to fit them all.

I found smaller and very responsive single turbo surge badly under partial load on Rb26 engines. You might need use aftermarket cams and VCT system to get around this problem if you are going to make above system work.

Will try to track down some pics of the old setup.

GTSBoy and hypergear

Yes, This is what I was thinking of doing.

Running one N1 off of the 6BOOST manifold with the exhaust gasses then passing through the other N1 and then into the S400.

With both N1 turbos suppling boost straight into the 4" inlet of the S400,

for it to compound and supply to the engine.

Or do you think I should run the S400 first then into the N1's.

Compound systems work VERY well and monster boost is NOT the only reason to do them ;) .
Have a read of this : http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=216811


Lots of compound systems out and working very well on petrol engines, best part of a compound system is to spool a turbo you normally wouldnt be able to, Kevin Jewers 2L DSM had a T3 50 trim and a S475 compounded and made full boost at 4500RPM (compared to NEVER with a single S475) and ran 8's. Although doing it i nthe way OP has mentioned it wont work at all.

Edited by Super Drager

I think that 45 psi IS monster boost for a petrol engine. You ain't running that on 98.

Ofcourse not, however you can get the total boost to a lot less than that. Pressure ratios multiply between compressors so what some guys have done is have it compound till the large turbo comes onto boost, then a bypass valve opens and flows as much air around the small compressor as possible. Boost Logic do it that way on their supra kits.

GT35R/GT45R Compound kit, 24PSI by 3500RPM.....runs mid 10's at 140+mph

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...