Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

poking around with the car I found few ecus and appreciate if someone can tell me which one is what .

pics below

also my ecu looks like it had some wire cuts , I am thinking the previous owner may have changed it to those boards that still use same shell with different board.

is there a way to find out without opening it?

does the dignostic software tell you ?

1.in the boot passenger side( is it hicas?)

i5dkjr.jpg

2.boot driver side (hicas or abs ?)

209rjw9.jpg

3.under passenger footwell ( ecu )? look at the tampered wires suggesting cutting was done

2u63hg1.jpg

4.under driver side footwell close to the gas pedal , what is it ?

2u8dp8k.jpg

5.under drive side footwell close to clutch

2dmcsvq.jpg

6. and this in the fuse box , what are they ?

4tnaxg.jpg

Many thanks :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456078-ecu-names/
Share on other sites

So, so googleable. Just for you own interest, why don't you try to google an image of a Nissan ECU? Google an image of a a HICAS CU.

And here's a tip. The E in ECU stands for Engine. So there is no such thing as an ABS ECU. It's just a CU.

I'll give you one hot tip. The numbers on those boxes are also googleable.

And here's a red hot tip. A screwdriver gets you inside the ECU too, so that you can answer your own question.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456078-ecu-names/#findComment-7522812
Share on other sites

That was very sarcastic!!

I know what ecu is but not which one is what

Fair enough you can take the e our and say computer unit etc but generally people do say it is x ecu y ecu

Anyway , i will google and if anyone isn't as sarcastic and helpful of gtsboy then reply ( if i dont myself after googling model number)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456078-ecu-names/#findComment-7522820
Share on other sites

I know and the box doesnt say on the label

You have the fuse which i know ,duh

You have relays which again is straigh forward but then you have the yellow green pink ones right at the top which have no clue what it is as never have seen such thing in 15 years of working with cars

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456078-ecu-names/#findComment-7523163
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...