Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday everyone,

Ive been having some dramas with intercooler piping blowing off ( RB25DET series 2, standard turbo [12 PSI only], front mount intercooler and front facing plenum in a R32) so have replaced all the joiners with new silicone joiners and T bar clamps on the whole lot.

On the hot side, there is 10 to 20mm movement, by hand, of the piping. Common sense tells me this is needed as the engine will move under load etc but i dont want it to be a cause for pipes to continue blowing off.

Should the moventment be a problem?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/457087-hot-side-piping-question/
Share on other sites

No, movement shouldn't be a problem.

A lot of people assume that those T clamps are better. They're actually not. Very good quality conventional hose clamps are the best. Make sure your pipes have sufficient weld bead at the ends to give something to clamp against. Use a cleaner (window cleaner or similar to clean the pipes and hoses before assembly, and you can use it as an assembly lube if they're too sticky once cleaned.

  • Like 1

i have to disagree. Good T clamps allow for the clamp to be taken off and put back on with no structural damage to the clamp.. ever. Cheap conventional hose clamps won't work, period. Good quality conventual hose clamps may get away with being taken off and put back on 4-5 times, after this they start to tighten on an angle and eventually strip/bend/snap the ladder section.

And what type of movement?

The standard silicone joiners are softer and allow movement of the pipe because when it's under load the intercooler is stationary to the chassis, the engine and pipework is not. I have not had a problem with aftermarket thicker/tighter ones though.

Is it possible your engine has too much movement?

Do you have lips on all your pipework?

The lip and clamp will cause a barrier where the lip cannot move passed the clamp. The hot side elbow should have a small one already.

I think the existing hose clamps had been on a off a few times are were warping as others have said, i hadnt changed them since buying the car.

I have had the engine out at DVS Jez workshop and he changed an engine mount while it was there if my memory is correct. But i will stick my head under the car and double check.

Yep thats the other thing i did, put a bead on all the pipes that didnt have one so there is something to grip against.

Every Tbolt clamp I have pressure tested leaks badly, as there is no clamp pressure between the points where the bolt does up. I only use standard Norma style worm clamps, they should only be tightened when the engine bay is hot, too hard and they will fail obviously.

Running up to 40psi with no dramas here.

Yep tbolt clamps are big bulky and you need to do them up ridiculously tight, the norma worm gear spring tension clamps are the best have never had a pipe blow off also make sure all your pipes are lipped at the end.

Are the pipes clean and oil/grease free (silicone joiners as well)?

Wipe them all with wax and grease remover so they can grip well. I havent had any problems with t-bolt clamps and i think one of my pipes doesnt have a bead. Running 23psi

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...