Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Emailed Stao after getting and fitting the turbo and never got a reply. I also think its best to get some real world information before approaching a tuner, hence asking for all your opinions.

And on that, do we think that Power FC is the best/ a good approach for tuning an R33 to be a reliable street car (with all the various needs and functions of a street car; cold start etc etc) or are there other popular brands/models to consider?

I have the same setup you mentioned in your first post being controlled by a PFC. Car runs like factory, including cold star and air-con. Unless you want the ability to switch between ethanol and pulp simultaneously, the old Apexi units are good affordable options.

  • Like 1

^ and I have a map you can use with your stock injectors, and a hypergear turbo which is good up to 1 bar (maxes out injectors) lol

you didn't happen to do one with the std turbo did you? from memory you used an ss2 which timing and fuelling would be very different.

i only ask because the adapt base map is very retarded and rich from people i have spoken to.

The base maps were virtually unusuable on my stagea. Too lean off boost, far too rich on boost. The whole timing map is about 7-8 degrees retarded from where I am now. One that they sent specifically for the stagea was horrendous. It was probably idling in the 9:1 afr range. I gave them feedback about it, though I dont think it made any difference.

Pity, their customer service is usually very good, and very helpful. But the base maps are terrible. You have to be prepared to do a lot of self tuning.

Edited by zoomzoom

The base maps were virtually unusuable on my stagea. Too lean off boost, far too rich on boost. The whole timing map is about 7-8 degrees retarded from where I am now. One that they sent specifically for the stagea was horrendous. It was probably idling in the 9:1 afr range. I gave them feedback about it, though I dont think it made any difference.

Pity, their customer service is usually very good, and very helpful. But the base maps are terrible. You have to be prepared to do a lot of self tuning.

Perhaps they sent you a base map for an S2 Stagea?

And really a base map should pretty much allow you to start and drive the car to a tuner, shouldn't it? To expect to plug in a tune and happily boost around the place without concern is pretty far fetched. Your base tune sounds very, very safe, lots of fuel, little ignition, which is what I know I would expect.

This is going to be speculation, but they surely can't be getting maps from a single source. When tuning a volumetric efficiency ECU, the fuel map should be reflective of the breathing characteristics of an engine. Which is why its puzzling that the fuel maps look so different from the stagea base map, r33 base map and my current fuel map (which matches the AFR targets very closely)

I have seen at least 1 tuner get their desired AFRs by just tuning the VE fuel map, where as the calculation takes into account both the target AFR and the VE for the current load/rpm. This act of tuning "your way" rather than the way the ECU is designed to be programmed makes for unintended results later.

I know that the R33 base fuel map will be lean missing below atmospheric load, and rich coughing above atmospheric load on my vehicle. But I should have the same engine as an R33, hence the mystery.

The timing map is safe enough and able to run the engine. But as for starting and getting to the tuner? Well it took me ages to figure out it was injecting hardly any cranking fuel, but then running like a coal powered train at idle.

Perhaps there should be an adaptronic sticky for sharing tuning tips. I have almost fully tuned my ECU back to stock levels of smoothness and reliability (eg cold starts, transient throttle, throttle transition etc), but its been 6 months of work.

The stagea base map sounds unusual. I would have thought you could load in an R33 base map.. unless there's something different about the Stagea motor. My R34 GTT adaptronic plugin fired up first time and idled OK. Needed some tweaks to the closed loop idle parameters to stop it from hunting. But there was nothing stopping me from driving it straight away. Mixtures were a little bit off, this will ALWAYS happen in a MAP-based ECU because FMIC, exhaust, turbo etc affect VE substantially. But you won't kill a motor running lean at vacuum. Besides which, turn on closed loop using the factory EGO sensor and it'll auto correct the mixtures at cruise. Do that, drive to tuner, sort it out. I had a wideband and wanted to tinker. The base map was perfectly acceptable starting point for me though.

I self-taught over a period of months. I deliberately took it slowly to make sure I understood what I was doing. It didn't take me long to match the factory driveability. Of course I then took it to a tuner and in a couple of hours it was running WAY better. That's expertise for you. Taking you 6 months isn't the ECU's fault in any way, it's just that you're learning as you go. Same as me, I think it was about 6 months before I went to a tuner as well. Mark @ MRC Castle Hill (if you're in Sydney). He was great, explained everything he was doing and why he was doing it. That's the kind of guy who knows exactly what he's doing, and isn't afraid to share it because he has been doing it for 20-30 years and is much faster than you. Besides which, he has all the equipment (dyno etc). When you see tuners who act like it's some secret special sauce, run away. Unless you're tuning serious power, it's not rocket science.

If there's one minor criticism about the Adaptronic it's that the ECU manual hasn't kept pace with the software. I am a tweaker and fiddler, I want to know what EVERY checkbox and option does. There are several that aren't documented but searching the adaptronic forums usually turned up the info I needed. The ECU manual has the basics about how to set up the idle control and PID gains and so on, so it's good enough to get you started.

you didn't happen to do one with the std turbo did you? from memory you used an ss2 which timing and fuelling would be very different.

i only ask because the adapt base map is very retarded and rich from people i have spoken to.

the map I put together should be ok for a standard turbo, however best to pull off about 2~3 degrees around 0.8 bar to be safe...

the base adaptronic map is only for starting your car and rolling it to the tuner haha.. it's really rough, whereas a Haltech map is more similar to a factory timing map. I based my map on the Haltech map with a mixture of the Nistune rom.

  • Like 1

Perhaps they sent you a base map for an S2 Stagea?

And really a base map should pretty much allow you to start and drive the car to a tuner, shouldn't it? To expect to plug in a tune and happily boost around the place without concern is pretty far fetched. Your base tune sounds very, very safe, lots of fuel, little ignition, which is what I know I would expect.

No a base map should run the car enough for it to be checked for leaks.... NOT TO DRIVE TO A TUNER... there is so much needed before its deemed safe to drive (ignition offset angles, latency etc) just those 2 alone could bore wash or melt an engine in a simple drive.

The r33 base map is very very rubbish will barely get the car started. Infact a flat 85ve map is alot better than the adaptronic base map, timing is just as shocking too

Edited by Scott Black

attached is a pretty sedate map (which is heaps nicer than the factory Adaptronic map)... of course don't use this map and thrash you car expecting it to be perfect....

USE AT YOUR OWN RISK...

It's for stock injectors and other stock stuff and a Hypergear SS2.. of course you can use it for other turbos but best to drive the car off boost till you see your favourite tuner that knows how to use an adaptronic ECU & software.. make sure you learn the TPS at 0% and 100% as each car is set differently.. then check your base timing, make sure it's synced at 15.

Stock Injectors on 98: http://www.adaptronic.com.au/forum/index.php?topic=5753.0

  • Like 2

Never had any issues with Nistune on R33 here. Been running Rb20 ecu setup for Rb25 with feature pack since it's early days and it hasn't skipped a beat. It's a daily running a GT3076R @ 18psi for the moment and a bunch of other things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...