Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was just about to lay down the cash for a Apexi Power FC for my R32 GTR,when a very knowledgable and trusted source mentions Autronic as an option.I realise that both Autronic systems aren't merely "plug in & play" like the P. FC.,but I'm interested in having the features of the full management system.I'm used to seeing the Apexi unit in almost everything that comes from Japan,so this Autronic thing is a new thing to me.I considered MoTec for a brief second,until the Bank Manager drew the crosshairs on me...and Microtech wont get a look in(been down that road with a friend before).The car is,effectively,standard right now,but will be the recipient for 2530's,pistons,rods,cams,clutch,fuel system etc etc in the not-to-distant future,hence the debate between the known quantity(Power FC)and the Aussie contender(Autronic,obviously...).I'm torn between the two-any info' on what you lot may've been through with either system would be appreciated!Cheers,J.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45785-power-fc-vs-autronic/
Share on other sites

Looking at your mods list (noting the great choice of 2530's), the Power FC would be my preference. For less than half what the Autronic would cost, wired and tuned.

Have a look at any of the PFC versus other ECU's threads, the Wolf is probably the best comparison. All the advantages of the PFC are listed.

Are there differences in the power FC's across the RB25 production years?

I have a 3.0 running an RB25DE head, and have been reading these sort of topics with interest.

I have been wanting to wire in an autronic or haltech as I think it would be enjoyable/a good experience especially with an engine conversion however I am a bit worried lately about getting an engineers certificate and a powerfc in a nissan box is looking more and more attractive.

whats wrong with wasted spark anyway? ignition problems? get the autronic cdi, that has so much power you can melt the end of the spark plugs off if you wanted to. If your going to try blow out that spark **** knows how much power your going to be making.

autronic can controle the standard idel controle valve, air con idel up, colsed loop functions so i have no idea where it is so called not as good. If autronic is so bad then same goes for motec as they are nearly identical as they come fromt he same makers after they broke up, and how many motecs do u see in japanese cars, alot if they are so bad.

SR910, And how much extra is the CDI? Why bother buying a more expensive unit like Autronic if you then also have to buy an extra CDI unit?

Of the two choices given I'd go PFC, but if you can find a good tuner then the Wolf is also a good choice.

Autronic CDI only has two caps so they are close to usless.Two capasitors 6 coils you work it out.

WE have a GTR making 683rwhp on a Wolf with stock coils, see this car in the current Zoom as it has just run 10.7 at 139.96mph.Waste spark is a bad thing and we even got our money back from autronic for a SMD and CDI that could not handle the ign this GTR now has a Plugin wolf and problems are solved first try after 3 years pain with the old set up.

Autronic and Motec are now far removed from each other as the split was many years ago.

I own a old autronic SMC and i'm wrapped with it but thats just me as i like to play with things.

It handles the Idle valve and ignition very well but i dont have stock coils anymore i have a 3xtwin coil packs & modules from bosch or something.

Also i have to raise another point about autronic ecu's are you need to replace the trigger disk in the CAS.

Now for you i would say get something plugin unless you really want to dish out the extra to get a SM2 with all the nice little extra's that the smc doesn't have.

Also the smc is really overpriced last time I checked compared to most powerFC/plugins prices i've seen & the sm2 is lots more.

John

PS on a side note they are fun to tune if you have all the gear (Autronic WB02) and hooked up correctly.

i have an SMC installed in my supercharged mitsubishi pajero, its an evo lancer plug and play with an extra ignition driver wired into the board. it works awesome, plugged straight into my original loom and i have the advantage of a nice big laptop screen to look at for tuning.... and how good is that auto tune feature, autronic is certainly not behind the eight ball when it comes to ecu's

i have an SMC installed in my supercharged mitsubishi pajero, its an evo lancer plug and play with an extra ignition driver wired into the board. it works awesome, plugged straight into my original loom and i have the advantage of a nice big laptop screen to look at for tuning.... and how good is that auto tune feature, autronic is certainly not behind the eight ball when it comes to ecu's

I HAVE to agree with Steve-SST, an ECU is a package, you just can't simply pick out 2 features and say it is better because of those. :headspin:

Let me choose one for comparison, a PFC with Commander is going to be 1/4 the cost of a Autronic and a lap top. If I have a "free" lap top, then I can add a Datalogit to the PFC, still less than 1/2 the cost.

How much extra did the auto tune really cost? Software, wiring, F&W lambda, tuning time etc etc. You get nothing for nothing.

I have used Autronics in a number of cars, BMW Supertourer, Commondoor (all of Larry's customer cars came with Autronics) etc. They are a great ECU for particular purposes, not EVERY purpose.

Horses for courses :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Remove it. Certainly from the hub face. I'm not in love with leaving it on the wheel assembly surface either - but if it is common to do so, then....maybe fair enough. It's not difficult. Just time consuming. For the hub face you just need a large enough block and suitable grades of abrasive paper to get it off flat. The same would be true of the assembly face. Just more time consuming, probably needing a lot more care. It's defo going to be easier just to assemble the wheels as is, seal them up, and check them periodically to see if there's any movement or loosening of the fasteners, than it will be to remove it though.
    • Hello, I got my wheels powder coated and they've powder coated bloody everything the mating surface and hub (even told them not to lol) anyway should I leave it or remove it. (Would be very hard) I've searched a lot and lots of powder coaters don't mask the mating surface but do mask the hub surface. How bad it powder coat on the mating surface or hub? My question is what should I do?
    • Yeah, R34 with RB25DE likely has a 4AX01 box in it, which is a medium duty auto ~ with the RB25DET mill, it would've been fitted with 4AX00 (4AX13) heavy duty build (same case, different internals). An RB25DET will lunch on a medium duty 4R01 auto in pretty short order ...to give you some visual idea of differences between the 'medium' and 'heavy duty' boxes, you only have to look at the 2/4 band for comparison...it's chalk and cheese...(plus bigger high clutch, extra pinion in the planetary sets, higher oil pump output, different bearings, higher TC stall speed )... You can control them with just about any aftermarket TCU for electric-over 4-speed with TC lockup clutch (ie; the GM 4L60E and others)...I have a custom standalone TCU that includes MAP sensor (for turbo applications) along with TPS, RPM, and line pressure monitoring...in other words, I don't use any ECU signals...no real need to.
    • If you want to do the wiring, the GTT engine ecu has the same pinouts extra that the seperate TCM in the NA car has. You can literally grab the wires/pins that lead into the Seperate TCM and wire them into the corresponding pins in the GTT Engine ECU. You could then in theory Nistune it. I realised this when everyone put it in the too hard basket and I actually looked at the f**kin R34 manual. This is after I had previously had a seperate aftermarket TCM controller in my original N/A chassis car and a very built gearbox from a GTT, running a seperate Haltech engine ECU. I ran into this issue when I re-shelled the car into a GTT shell, so my aftermarket TCM was no longer plug and play, because the loom/modules were not present. I was pretty livid when realizing just how simple the original fix actually was. It sat for 3+ years at various workshops trying to find a solution. In practice none of this is a worthwhile idea for a lot of reasons, generally surrounding the shitness of the NA auto, the autos in general that come with skylines, and the NA engine and lack of gains. The gearbox is specced for the 2.5L N/A and barely at that level. If you have to pay anyone any money to do any of this, that is money spent on manualizing the car and it's not even close in terms of a comparison. Learning to drive manual is simpler than going through the pain of dealing with the N/A gearbox and he'll have fun to boot.
×
×
  • Create New...