Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb25neo Turbo Setup - Opinions/recommendations

Kmac92

By Kmac92,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Kmac92 Enthusiast

Kmac92

Posted
Posted

GTX3076 TS with 1.06 a/r.

Anyone used this setup before? Gathering from what ive read....people who opt for the twin scroll option in regards to turbo/manifold, always go the next housing size up to whats commonly used on the single, in this case .82 would be fair to say is most commonly used on the neos. (Please correct me if im wrong, its the most common one ive seen people using on dyno sheets, but they dont specify the type of manifold ect..)

6boost twin scroll manifold. T3 or T4 flange? Does it matter?

To go a single 50mm external gate or twin XXmm external gate ?

Im chasing a comfortable 300-350rwk on 98. Getting the most out of the turbo without going e85.

hypergear Grand Master

hypergear

Posted
Posted

I'm not sure how urgently you need this to be done. I'm currently working on a RB bolton turbo prototype that will get you a responsive 400rwkws on E85 fuel. Initial test results shown 380rwkws (out of fuel) and 353 on P98 (out of fuel) on the RB25 dyno sheet section.

That turbo has factory manifold and dump pipe patterns, uses all factory lines. Prototype should be completed towards the end of Aug.

hypergear Grand Master

hypergear

Posted
Posted

Can we see a graph of this prototype please stao?

R34 GTT RB25DET NEO unopened engine.

- Adaptronic​ ECU

- 1000CC ID injectors

- Factory cams, cams gears, and all manifolds.

- HyperGear ATR45SAT Internal gated RB25 bolton Turbocharger

- JJR 3 inches turbo back exhaust

- Walbro 470L/H Fuel pump

- 4 inches induction pipe

- Split fire coil packs

- PWR 600x300x81mm intercooler

- E85, 380rwkws run out of fuel.

- Tuned by Trent Hewitson​, Chequered Tuning​.

power.jpg

e85v98powerboost.jpg

enginebay1.jpg

R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted

GTX3076 TS with 1.06 a/r.

Anyone used this setup before? Gathering from what ive read....people who opt for the twin scroll option in regards to turbo/manifold, always go the next housing size up to whats commonly used on the single, in this case .82 would be fair to say is most commonly used on the neos. (Please correct me if im wrong, its the most common one ive seen people using on dyno sheets, but they dont specify the type of manifold ect..)

6boost twin scroll manifold. T3 or T4 flange? Does it matter?

To go a single 50mm external gate or twin XXmm external gate ?

Im chasing a comfortable 300-350rwk on 98. Getting the most out of the turbo without going e85.

GTX no point without E85.

You won't be able to run the boost required to get the most out of it.

A GT3076 will match a GTX under about 20psi. The GTX's were supposed to deliver better response etc etc over the GT series but it didn't really happen. What did happen though is they are FAR more efficient at higher pressures, but you need E85 for that. Won't get away with it on PULP.

You can make a solid 300-320rwkw out of a GT3076 without going E85. That is what you would be aiming for IMO. If you want more, GT35 for around 350-370.

Twin scroll is "meant" to have dual gates in the ideal world, but given the results out there that suggest you can just get away with a merge/single larger gate - it's certainly more economical :)

  • Like 1
Kmac92 Enthusiast

Kmac92

Posted
  • Author
Posted

GTX no point without E85.

You won't be able to run the boost required to get the most out of it.

A GT3076 will match a GTX under about 20psi. The GTX's were supposed to deliver better response etc etc over the GT series but it didn't really happen. What did happen though is they are FAR more efficient at higher pressures, but you need E85 for that. Won't get away with it on PULP.

You can make a solid 300-320rwkw out of a GT3076 without going E85. That is what you would be aiming for IMO. If you want more, GT35 for around 350-370.

Twin scroll is "meant" to have dual gates in the ideal world, but given the results out there that suggest you can just get away with a merge/single larger gate - it's certainly more economical :)

Awesome. Cheers mate. How about the rear housing size? Is it a 'rule of thumb' to go the bigger size up from normal when going the twin scroll manifold/turbo option if after response?

For example..

If i was going single scroll t3 manifold/turbo..id obviously get the .82 a/r housing.

but as im going TS...

would i be better off with a 1.06a/r to give me similar response time to the .82a/r single scroll (as ive heard TS spool up quicker) and given that i could put more flow through a 1.06a/r, thus giving me more power and yeh a comfortable 320-330 on 98 is what im after at this stage .

I just havent seen anyone with that setup and would be interested to see how it went....and if the response was good and lag minimal.

T3 TS GT/GTX3076 turbo/manifold combination with 1.06a/r

As for gate. Ive decided to run the single turbosmart 50mm. I feel the 700 for another gate could go towards some type b poncams

scotty nm35 Grand Master

scotty nm35

Posted
Posted

Definitely the 1.06 TS if you are sticking to 98, on e85 you can get away with the more restrictive .82 TS.

There is definitely a .82 TS graph in the RB25 results thread, but it was e85 and fitted to a 6 boost manifold.

Where are you getting quotes for your gates? That's nearly twice what I sell them for, in smaller sizes.

Kmac92 Enthusiast

Kmac92

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Definitely the 1.06 TS if you are sticking to 98, on e85 you can get away with the more restrictive .82 TS.

There is definitely a .82 TS graph in the RB25 results thread, but it was e85 and fitted to a 6 boost manifold.

Where are you getting quotes for your gates? That's nearly twice what I sell them for, in smaller sizes.

Thanks mate! Although, id really like to see a graph of some sort if someones got one? Otherwise i might just bite the bullet and see how i go.. I just hope its not 'Too' laggy with a slow response time.

That price was from sonic performance. Quite expensive! But being turbosmart you get that i guess...

scotty nm35 Grand Master

scotty nm35

Posted
Posted

Being Sonic you get that, MTQ aren't the cheapest. Like I said, I sell Turbosmart much cheaper. ;)

Too laggy is a matter of opinion, but if you want less lag get a smaller GTX3071, GTX28 or Hypergear SS2 and push it harder, no point getting a large turbo and strangling the exhaust side.

Kmac92 Enthusiast

Kmac92

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Being Sonic you get that, MTQ aren't the cheapest. Like I said, I sell Turbosmart much cheaper. ;)

Too laggy is a matter of opinion, but if you want less lag get a smaller GTX3071, GTX28 or Hypergear SS2 and push it harder, no point getting a large turbo and strangling the exhaust side.

Thats handy to know ! Cheers

Yeh thats it, thats why im deciding between the 1.06a/r or .82a/r...plenty of breathing room

scotty nm35 Grand Master

scotty nm35

Posted
Posted

The .82 TS is about the same as the .63 open housing imo, and too small for that compressor size (on an rb25) without running e85, which helps suppress the detonation smaller restrictive housings generate.

Kmac92 Enthusiast

Kmac92

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Heres the quote from mtq/sonic performance

The 1.06 a/r is same price....pitty its got big wait might source from somewhere else..

post-136710-14380564356106_thumb.jpg

Edited by Kmac92
R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted

Contact SAU Traders mate, best advice I can give RE: pricing.

We have Street to Track who are almost unbeatable on turbo pricing from what I've seen in recent time, no doubt they will do a SAU'er a good package price as well.

Shoot them a PM - http://www.sau.com.au/forums/user/83240-street-to-track/

AngryRB Grand Master

AngryRB

Posted
Posted (edited)

When i had TS0.82 on a 6boost, felt same as an open 0.82 on stock mani, but i lost 500rpms response for some reason, was same tune and everything else identical.. single gate on the housing but further around the snail so maybe that caused it? E85

Stock mani, gate off housing was best setup...

Edited by AngryRB
Kmac92 Enthusiast

Kmac92

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Contact SAU Traders mate, best advice I can give RE: pricing.

We have Street to Track who are almost unbeatable on turbo pricing from what I've seen in recent time, no doubt they will do a SAU'er a good package price as well.

Shoot them a PM - http://www.sau.com.au/forums/user/83240-street-to-track/

Cheers mate.

Haha when i click that link for some reason it takes me to a thread about a biodiesel skyline

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • RP1421
      S15 Spec R

      By RP1421 · Posted

      As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • joshuaho96
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • perry_r33
      R34 GTR Vspec Garage Sale - All must go!

      By perry_r33 · Posted

      Pm sent 
    • Robot
      Skyline v36 350GT sedan hunting on idle

      By Robot · Posted

      Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • GabsReDeal
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By GabsReDeal · Posted

      After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...