Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Question, is the R34 RB25DE Neo factory airbox the same as the DET Neo model? If possible i would like to run the standard air box :)

I'm not sure about that, however with regards to '400 Hp And Standard Airbox?', this is possible.

My GTT ran 275rwkw on the dyno with a closed standard airbox and a high flow filter and 285rwkw without airbox lid and filter. This is with a hard intake pipe from Scotty.

Quick question for those who have done it

How can you make the Z32 AFM bolt to the stock airbox which is designed for a smaller unit?

I mean, is there a legit way that most people do or are we just drilling and bolting nice and tight lol

I'm not sure about that, however with regards to '400 Hp And Standard Airbox?', this is possible.

My GTT ran 275rwkw on the dyno with a closed standard airbox and a high flow filter and 285rwkw without airbox lid and filter. This is with a hard intake pipe from Scotty.

Thanks V28VX37, What turbo were you using? supporting mods? Was the cold air feed still on the air box?

Thanks V28VX37, What turbo were you using? supporting mods? Was the cold air feed still on the air box?

Yes cold air feed still through the airbox in both cases. Full specs and dyno sheet here: http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55845-rb25-turbo-upgrade-all-dyno-results/?p=7370873

Quick question for those who have done it

How can you make the Z32 AFM bolt to the stock airbox which is designed for a smaller unit?

I mean, is there a legit way that most people do or are we just drilling and bolting nice and tight lol

i thought the body of the gtst and z32 airflow meter were the same, just the range in the electronics is different

^^ pretty common these days, us Vic guys have been using as many stock parts as possible for years, stealth power is the goal these days.

400wkw is easy for the stock airbox with a good panel filter, I have seen nearly 500kw on a GTR box, but it did make 20kw more with the lid and filter removed.

A Z32 afm will bolt straight up to a gtt airbox, you just need to solder a (new) plug on for it.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...