Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey peoples, I'll keep it simple

Got a rb25 t67 kinugawa 18psi bp98

Made 350hp at hubs.

Took it to the track and had a drift. I lived my dream.

The car is sitting in the garage and there's a rb30 block next to it.

I've only driven it once it was nice.

I'm gonna put the rb30 in there now cause I like spinning spanners.

What I'm after is less lag and more wheel spin.

It's just for the street now and I want an animal.

I'm looking at Garrett gt3076 .82

I'm not after hp, just spinning tyres.

What about gtx range? Or .63

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461078-rb2530-turbo-choice-again/
Share on other sites

Keep the t67 with a 30 bottom end it will be even more responsive.

I know my rb25 t67 all it does is spin wheels with basic 235 tyres

1 5000 on wheelspin

2 4500

3 4200

Thats jist footflat no clutching t67 are very agressive although i also made another 100 hp at 17 psi 450hp

I would go with something similar to a GTX3582 with a 1.06 housing.. that 3.0L will spool anything with a VCT head.

Look at 2JZ-GTE with VVT-i heads.. it will give you a good idea, those motors will happily spool up a GTX3582 1.06 rear around 4k rpm and produce very linear torque and linear power.

A T67 would be too small.

From what I've read they spool 500rpm earlier on 3l.

So with the setup I have that would be a big enprovment.

Boosting 5000 1st 4500 second and 4200 third is like mine.

I think 3582 on 3l will be too much. I'm not after a drag car with peak power.

The way I'm looking at it is I made 350hp at the wheels with 2.5 and t67. If I were to up th cc to 3l and run a smaller turbo gt3076 .82, I could easily make 350hp but I'll be boosting at 3800 4000 in first. Am I on the rite track?

T67 is restrictive on the turbine side. For a 3L you are better off going for a GT3582 or equivalent, alternatively the 25G comp with TD06H turbine inside 10 CM housing.

Listen to Stao on this one.

I am running a TDO6H-25G 12cm on 30DET for track-only.

Had been running a GT3076 0.87 turbo.

Turbine restriction showed itself when tuning with the GT30, although it was a very sweet combination for road-only use. With Garrett I would go with a GT35 0.82

The TDO6H 12cm provides great linear delivery for track, but some stage I'm interested to slip on a 10cm housing. With that I'd expect 3-500rpm earlier for full boost, say 2900rpm for 17psi. The 12cm housing for road-only might not be the ideal match if you need mumbo in the 2000-3000rpm range. 12cm is more than adequate for response across 3500-7000 on track though.

For the money would also look closely at a BW 7670 especially if finances don't stretch to a proper split pulse with twin gates, fancy manifold etc.

My t67 comes on at 4100 in 4th on a 25 but makes peek power at 7800 at a flat 17 across the board .

My understanding was that it would come on around 3600 on 30 and behave well on the st.

This kinda annoys me as i had planned to use this settup eg put a 30 bottom end on.

Michelomore made 400 on a 2530 with a gtx3076 .8 i beleive

It's all application dependent for what is best suited.

^^ Fully agree the GT3582 is more suited to the 3 litre than a GT30. Those 1.06 housings aren't so easy to acquire, and the bulkier housing impinges into the centre bearing area making hookup to oil/water lines more difficult.

Cheapest option by far is to run the existing TD06SDL2-25G (aka T67 25G)and see if he likes it. Dimensions suggest broadly similar capabilities to a GTX3076.

30DET with stock cams, VCT working, stock inlet manifold etc will belt out some decent mid range torque but tend to peak around/just under 6000rpm. Bigger turbine does not automatically equate to peaky or laggy performance. But it can extend the usable upper rpm without making it gutless right down low. That's why the TDO6H 10cm turbine spec was suggested. I would back it as a very good all rounder, with the 12cm more suited to track. There's enough in-car video in my 33 build thread to demonstrate that unit as progressive, not focused on peak power.

350rwhp was a figure mentioned earlier. If the preference is for Kinugawa product and that sort of hp and very quick/early spool to fry rubber, try a TDO6SL2-20G. Not big $$ to play around and trial. I reckon it would fall over with engine rpm, maybe 5500. I'd suggest similar in sizing and characteristics to a GT3071.

The BW 7670 shouldn't be ignored. Robust, priced competitively, and different specs available to tailor it to application.

Edited by Dale FZ1

The t67 25g seemes to preform between the 3076 and the 3582.

Really depend on were he wants the power band sounds like down low for the street

not sure if you noticed the above dyno graph I posted of a GTX3582 on a 3.0L 2JZ

but it's all in at 3500rpm with 25psi and look at the power delivery, also if you were to run a little less boost it would come on even earlier.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...