Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For $800 no.

Be lucky to have an R+R for under $2000.

PITA to do twins :(

Go Single :)

Will make future life a lot easier. The modern singles are better than the older twins. IMHO.

(Speak with John at Trojans to get a good idea)

Edited by Sinista32

+1 for Trojan he's doing my build, and can pull a gtr motor out fit twins and reinstall quicker than most people can just swapping twins with the motor in place, plus the upside with pulling the motor out is you can check all the under plenum hoses and welsh plugs for leaks ect, and I'd be going -9/gtss they are awesome on a stock 26!!

Thanks guys, will most likely be sticking with the twins. I know single is the way to go but won't be chasing huge power, probably looking to settle around 300-350 awkw. Plus want to get the stock turbos outta there soonish as I know it's a ticking time bomb but funds limited due to building new house plus new baby. Keen to hear your thoughts between -9, -7, -5 or N1's.

  • 2 weeks later...

I would pay a little extra and have the engine taken out, replace all hot and cold gaskets with the best you can

If you don't there's a good chance one will let go

My rocker cover gasket (often over looked) leaked a little oil down the turbo side of the block, this oil reached the turbo manifold fasteners and loosened them and caused the gasket to leak. I was down on power for ages but could never figure out why.

Your jamming boost into old gaskets and that's not good

I would pay a little extra and have the engine taken out, replace all hot and cold gaskets with the best you can

If you don't there's a good chance one will let go

My rocker cover gasket (often over looked) leaked a little oil down the turbo side of the block, this oil reached the turbo manifold fasteners and loosened them and caused the gasket to leak. I was down on power for ages but could never figure out why.

Your jamming boost into old gaskets and that's not good

Sounds like they weren't done up correctly to begin with. If that's the case, rod bolts and main stud nuts would fall out willy nilly too.

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...